Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Антискрепа

Channel

Антискрепа

@antiskrepa9191

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,075subscribers

+147 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001639754642
TypeChannel
Username@antiskrepa9191
DescriptionРезервный канал профессора. Будут вопросы - пишите админу @elenaantiskrepa. А не будут - все равно чиркните пару строк.
Created23 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/antiskrepa9191

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,8906,1226,0066 August 2026 — 5,928 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,928 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,935 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,939 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,932 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,930 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,928 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,917 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,914 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,908 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,899 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,896 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,892 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,890 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,122 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,121 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,107 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,098 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,096 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,084 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,072 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,079 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,075 subscribers6,0756 August 20263 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 89 days, net +147. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,855–6,157 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 13:596,075-4
31 Oct 2026, 21:366,079+7
29 Oct 2026, 02:566,072-12
25 Oct 2026, 15:556,084-12
22 Oct 2026, 05:266,096-2
19 Oct 2026, 00:206,098-9
13 Oct 2026, 05:006,107-14
6 Oct 2026, 13:416,121-1
29 Sept 2026, 03:376,122+232
19 Sept 2026, 08:425,890-2
14 Sept 2026, 21:195,892-4
11 Sept 2026, 03:555,896-3
1 Sept 2026, 23:345,899-9
29 Aug 2026, 20:335,908-6
26 Aug 2026, 13:585,914-3
23 Aug 2026, 20:265,917-11
20 Aug 2026, 02:345,928-2
17 Aug 2026, 11:135,930-2
14 Aug 2026, 00:275,932-7
10 Aug 2026, 17:565,939first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.5%
avg views ÷ 6,075 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,640
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held60 (29 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total60,820
Reactions total932
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 01:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,380
Videos
≈107
Links
≈2,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,631 reactions across 60 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁59822.7%
💯47117.9%
👍35213.4%
🤬2559.69%
🤔1766.69%
🤡1325.02%
🔥1013.84%
🤣1003.80%
❤903.42%
👏772.93%
👎532.01%
🤷‍♂511.94%
😱441.67%
🤝311.18%
😨160.608%
👌130.494%
🖕120.456%
😢100.38%
🥱80.304%
👀70.266%
12 further kinds341.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,631 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (13.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 15:28 UTC≈1,000 views34 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Так, товарищи дорогие, Армения в 2027 г. собралась подавать доки в ЕС. Соответственно, мы и вся ЕАЭС от Армении отворачиваемся. Этого момента ждут не дождутся турки, которые быстро начнут прибирать к рукам бесхозный актив. Без аннексии, разумеется. Содержать армян турки не будут. Если сценарий реализуется, в Россию хлынут сотни тысяч новых беженцев, пристраивать которых у нас нет никакой возможности. Вопрос: мы к…

🤬18🌚5😱5🤡4🔥2

4 Nov 2026, 13:12 UTC≈3,040 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Как обычно Вениамин Иванович в белом кителе и рядом.

😁6🔥3❤1

4 Nov 2026, 07:48 UTC≈3,900 views43 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

У ждунов из РБК шабаш ведьм: Трамп проиграл. Объясняется сие действо просто: демократы поддерживают хохлов, а Трамп - нет. Отсюда и злорадство, микшируемое «заботой» о простых американцах. Ни про День народного единства, ни про Казанскую ни слова.

💯28😁14🍌1

3 Nov 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,630 views52 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Допелись. Зарплаты работников объявлены главным врагом бизнеса в 2027 году. Я перестаю понимать, куда русская монетарная экономика последних лет движется. Вроде бы, и Путин говорит об экономике «высоких зарплат». И мы знаем, что без платежеспособного спроса не будет реализации. А вот поди ж ты. Пусть горлопаны начнут с себя. Только, чур, их не подкармливать. Никита Кричевский в Мах

👍38😁12❤2

3 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,630 views51 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Г-жа Останина, видите ли в чем дело: Хеллоуин в РГБ НЕ праздновали. Там было совсем другое мероприятие, проводило которое вполне респектабельное издательство «ЭКСМО». Со всеми необходимыми согласованиями. И потом. Драпировка (сокрытие) Мавзолея на 9 мая - это, по-Вашему, не осквернение? Ну тогда я вообще ничего не понимаю. Никита Кричевский в Мах

👍31😁12👏6❤1👎1

3 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,660 views17 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Опубликованы поправки Минтранса, касающиеся СИМ, велосипедов, автомобилей. Лично меня больше всего заинтересовал запрет выезжать на перекресток, если впереди затор. Даже если вы поворачиваете. А на чем замкнулись вы? Никита Кричевский в Мах

❤6👨‍💻5👍3😁3

2 Nov 2026, 16:29 UTC≈1,790 views12 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Ну, очень интересный тренд Никита Кричевский в Мах

👌12

2 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,790 views58 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Директор Ларисы Долиной попросил СМИ и блохеров перестать хейтить Ларису Александровну из-за квартирного дела. Видите ли, в чем дело, дорогой директор. Аморальное поведение Вашей патронессы давно стало мемом (схема Долиной) и ушло в народ. Плюс, в пиаре есть такое понятие «самотёк». Это когда несколько заказных публикаций вместе с негативным образом антигероя начинают жить своей жизнью и выскакивают из самых разны…

👏26💯23😁7👍2

1 Nov 2026, 15:29 UTC≈1,920 views46 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Печально знаменитое краснодарское судопроизводство. Вероятно, Кондратьев свои дни на посту губернатора отжил. Сменщиком предполагается жесткий человек из АП. Никита Кричевский в Мах

👍20🤔17😁6🤷‍♀2👌1

31 Oct 2026, 06:43 UTC≈6,190 views33 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

В Америке высокотехнологичные гиганты рушатся, но у РБК все новости о кризисе власти в любимой хохлами Польше. Шляхтичи же, как иначе? Никита Кричевский в Мах

😁30🔥2🙈1

30 Oct 2026, 13:06 UTC≈2,430 views39 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Для плательщиков налога на имущество (хаты, тарантайки, лодочки, прочие ништяки). ФНС берет на разгон 10 дней с момента платежа. Может засчитать, а может… Срок уплаты - до 1 декабря. Если вы самый умный и отчините кэш 30 ноября, вы гарантированно влетите на штраф. Всех высоколобых (типа, налог считается уплоченным с момента платежа) сразу в сад. Они совершенно точно заплатят налог заранее, а тут будут флудить. …

👎17🤔15👍5❤2

30 Oct 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,260 views39 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Ночной взлом Binance на $6,5 млрд потерь связывают с хакерами из Северной Кореи. Ни хрена себе мир изменился. Вот тебе и изгой. Никита Кричевский в Мах

🔥26🤡7😁6

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @antiskrepa9191. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @antiskrepa9191 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алексей Кричевский | Экономизм
@economismrussia · 19,605
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 October 2026
КУСАЧ
@buzzerking · 182,721
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
RED BINDER
@redbinder · 185,859
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Антискрепа” (@antiskrepa9191), 6,075 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antiskrepa9191.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.