Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⊕ ANTITERROR CHRI | NARTIADA ♰

Channel

⊕ ANTITERROR CHRI | NARTIADA ♰

@antiterrorchrii

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

21,576subscribers

+554 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001467738704
TypeChannel
Username@antiterrorchrii
Created3 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 October 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/antiterrorchrii

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

21,02221,57621,2996 August 2026 — 21,022 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,032 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,053 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,063 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,082 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,097 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,116 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,129 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,148 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,156 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,148 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,139 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,149 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,151 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,138 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,164 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,188 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,200 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,212 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,222 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,235 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,248 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,257 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,271 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,277 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,285 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,291 subscribers5 September 2026 — 21,302 subscribers9 September 2026 — 21,283 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,284 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,317 subscribers15 September 2026 — 21,312 subscribers17 September 2026 — 21,330 subscribers19 September 2026 — 21,321 subscribers26 September 2026 — 21,355 subscribers4 October 2026 — 21,371 subscribers9 October 2026 — 21,391 subscribers13 October 2026 — 21,508 subscribers14 October 2026 — 21,516 subscribers15 October 2026 — 21,524 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,534 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,538 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,552 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,558 subscribers20 October 2026 — 21,559 subscribers21 October 2026 — 21,566 subscribers22 October 2026 — 21,559 subscribers24 October 2026 — 21,562 subscribers24 October 2026 — 21,567 subscribers25 October 2026 — 21,566 subscribers27 October 2026 — 21,576 subscribers6 August 202627 October 2026
51 measurements spanning 82 days, net +554. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,939–21,659 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Oct 2026, 22:0721,576+10
25 Oct 2026, 23:2621,566-1
24 Oct 2026, 22:4921,567+5
24 Oct 2026, 02:1821,562+3
22 Oct 2026, 23:4021,559-7
21 Oct 2026, 19:4021,566+7
20 Oct 2026, 13:0621,559+1
19 Oct 2026, 13:5521,558+6
18 Oct 2026, 16:4021,552+14
17 Oct 2026, 14:5021,538+4
16 Oct 2026, 13:3521,534+10
15 Oct 2026, 15:1121,524+8
14 Oct 2026, 18:0821,516+8
13 Oct 2026, 08:3121,508+117
9 Oct 2026, 02:5821,391+20
4 Oct 2026, 18:5721,371+16
26 Sept 2026, 23:5621,355+34
19 Sept 2026, 16:4021,321-9
17 Sept 2026, 04:4021,330+18
15 Sept 2026, 03:1921,312first reading

Engagement

410 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 21,576 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,510
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 410 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026
Posts held410 (4 August 2026 – 11 October 2026)
Views total217,510
Reactions total5,749
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Oct 2026, 00:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 11m
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 106 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

30,111 reactions across 401 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣7,38024.5%
😁5,62118.7%
👍4,47014.8%
🔥3,28210.9%
❤3,20010.6%
💯2,0186.70%
🤬7062.34%
🥰3331.11%
👏3261.08%
🤯2970.986%
🙈2240.744%
⚡2080.691%
🤔2050.681%
🙉1980.658%
😢1830.608%
😭1530.508%
😡1310.435%
👎1080.359%
👻930.309%
🤷‍♀920.306%
28 further kinds8832.93%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 402 of the 410 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 410 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
401
across the posts below
Posts paid on
59
of 402 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
201
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @antiterrorchrii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 410 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 11 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,610 views71 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯63👍7👎1

11 Oct 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,740 views51 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Прекрасный ролик и выводы правильные, что бывает редко! Я сделаю подобный по теме ихванов на книгах Саида Кутба. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8RehECRvOc

👍45⚡6

11 Oct 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,680 views75 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Forwarded from @bankstaPhoto

В Британии, Германии, Испании, Италии и Франции сотнями поджигают церкви после приглашения миллионов мигрантов с Ближнего Востока @banksta

🤬60😢13🥰1🙏1

11 Oct 2026, 10:44 UTC≈2,470 views154 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

🐓 В России запретили распространять в интернете видео с петушиными боями. Суд признал такие ролики запрещённой информацией. Теперь их могут удалять с сайтов и интернет-платформ. Как теперь смотреть интернет бои ашаритов с ахли-сунной?

😁84🤣63👍7

11 Oct 2026, 09:41 UTC≈2,270 views70 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Forwarded from @yandawi

📖 Как же этот усатый будулак любит шатать воздух ради иллюзии ответа на мои посты))

😁46🤣15😍7👍2

11 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,370 views73 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Время и место, мой юный друг.

🔥43👍18🥰12

11 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,320 views68 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

Ас-саляму ‘аляйкум ва рахмату-Ллахи ва баракатух. Аль-хамду ли-Лляхи Рабби-ль-‘алямин, ва-с-саляту ва-с-саляму ‘аля набиййина Нетаньяху, ва-‘аля алихи ва-сахбихи аджма‘ин. Амма ба‘д... Наш дорогой Магомедушка раздуплился и делает вид перед своими шнырями, что он ещё способен мне заочно хамить. Давайте разберём его мыслеформулы. 📚 И так, что же, вернем собачку на цепь по тихоньку? Он называет меня, своего соплеменни…

👍31🤣16🔥10❤5💯3🤯3

11 Oct 2026, 07:21 UTC≈2,290 views58 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Почему тоже самое не сделал наилучший из когда-либо рождённых с беззубой старухой с красными дёснами? Почему он как лох двадцать лет просидел под каблуком богатой милфы, дожидаясь её смерти? Вопросы, вопросики.

😁55🙉3

11 Oct 2026, 05:26 UTC≈2,470 views46 reactions1 Starread 12 October 2026

Джоузи, ты когда прижмёшь к ногтю лупоглазого яхуда из Америки? Пока ты там пилишь никому не нужные темы про Махди и аль-Джассасу, этот мадхалит залезает в мозги глупой и агрессивной кавказской молодёжи. Если уж ты отмалчиваешься, придётся это делать мне.

🔥38🤷‍♀4😘4

11 Oct 2026, 03:30 UTC≈2,420 views161 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Forwarded from @tvjihadVideo

Это открытие потянет на Нобелевскую премию по медицине.

🤣89😁45💯13🤯7🏆4🤔3

10 Oct 2026, 08:58 UTC≈3,500 views207 reactions20 Starsread 12 October 2026
Video

Сахих аль-Ташкенти. Хадис 33 Однажды посланник Аллаха сидел в компании мухаджиров и ансаров. Абу Тальха встал и спросил его: «О, пророк, какая твоя любимая песня?». Ибн Хишам сказал: «Наверняка, это Хабиби, ведь так, посланник Аллаха?» Его оттолкнул рукой Абу Бакр, сказав: «Клянусь Аллахом, я уверен, что это Аиша!» Посланник Аллаха сделал знак рукой, и когда все успокоились, он тихонечно запел: «Матушка-земля, белая…

😁100🤣76🔥17❤6👏6🌚1🤔1

9 Oct 2026, 18:34 UTC≈3,580 views33 reactions201 Starsread 12 October 2026

Маршо-Свободы! 🍃 Хотите быть в курсе эксклюзивного контента? 📱 Станьте спонсором на Patreon и получайте доступ к уникальным материалам за 50-20 евро в месяц! https://patreon.com/Pr... Другие варианты поддержки: 📱Биткоин: https://tourniquet.app... 📱 PayPal: https://paypal.me/borz... 📱 Бусти: https://boosty.to/anti... 📱 Донат: https://www.donational... Следите за мной в социальных сетях, куда мы ретранслируем пря…

❤22👍7👻3🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 410 posts we hold for @antiterrorchrii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@antiterrorchrii edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Sept 2026, 15:21 UTCAnonymous Poll500 voters

Есть ли смысл отвечать на выпады мелких ссыкливых блогеров типа антиприматов? Мне всё равно, кому отвечать, но у них просто очень низкий интеллект. Они просто тупорылые. Я пытался три года, это бесполезно.

  1. Да31%
  2. Нет71%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTCAnonymous Poll1,220 voters approx.

Ваш возраст в диапазоне.

  1. 10-1811%
  2. 19-2530%
  3. 25-3014%
  4. 30-3516%
  5. 35-4014%
  6. 40 и более17%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTCAnonymous Poll373 voters

Кузины ещё нарожают? 😄

  1. Да26%
  2. Нет18%
  3. Аллаху Аʼлям66%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 410 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⊕ ANTITERROR CHRI | NARTIADA ♰” (@antiterrorchrii), 21,576 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antiterrorchrii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.