24 measurements spanning 25 days, net +585. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,661–17,422 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Sept 2026, 21:14
17,334
+24
31 Aug 2026, 21:14
17,310
+25
30 Aug 2026, 22:27
17,285
+28
29 Aug 2026, 18:57
17,257
+52
28 Aug 2026, 20:13
17,205
+17
27 Aug 2026, 19:42
17,188
+3
26 Aug 2026, 21:56
17,185
-7
25 Aug 2026, 20:33
17,192
-7
24 Aug 2026, 23:42
17,199
+12
23 Aug 2026, 07:06
17,187
+3
21 Aug 2026, 18:56
17,184
+7
20 Aug 2026, 15:25
17,177
+34
19 Aug 2026, 13:23
17,143
-8
18 Aug 2026, 16:37
17,151
+12
17 Aug 2026, 17:56
17,139
+17
16 Aug 2026, 15:25
17,122
+16
14 Aug 2026, 20:25
17,106
+35
13 Aug 2026, 07:44
17,071
+40
12 Aug 2026, 04:06
17,031
+40
11 Aug 2026, 03:24
16,991
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.5%
avg views ÷ 17,334 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,460
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.863%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
39 (21 July 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
130,990
Reactions total
1,131
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 02:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
597
Videos
236
Links
263
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
20m 34s
Average length
1m 13s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,161 reactions across 38 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
837
38.7%
🔥
634
29.3%
❤
481
22.3%
👎
124
5.74%
😎
27
1.25%
🤣
19
0.879%
👏
18
0.833%
😁
15
0.694%
🤯
6
0.278%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 38 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @antonkhorev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔍 Ходил тут в клинику косметологии и поймал себя на мысли, насколько же важно попадать к людям, которые понимают тебя с полуслова
Потому что обычно заходишь в подобные места и уже морально готовишься, что сейчас тебе найдут ещё 17 проблем, о существовании которых ты даже не подозревал 😂
А тут буквально с порога разговор с врачом пошёл в формате: что меня реально беспокоит, что можно сделать, а куда вообще не надо л…
Забудь про белые кеды!
Сегодня говорим об обуви, и что актуально носить. Подготовил вам большую подборку 😎
⏺️Коричневые топсайдеры Harry Hatchet
⏺️Коричневые топсайдеры Timberland
⏺️Черные топсайдеры Salamander
⏺️Бежевые топсайдеры Mascotte
⏺️Бордовые кожаные лоферы LIME
⏺️Черные пенни-лоферы LIME
⏺️Коричневые пенни-лоферы LIME
⏺️А вот тут хороший выбор тирольских ботинок
⏺️Ботинки ONEMENT
⏺️Ботинки Geste
⏺️Черн…
⏺️4 дня в одних брюках и никто не заметит
Серые брюки 4 дня подряд. Но не один человек не спросил «а ты вчера не в этом же был?»
Секрет простой, меняешь верх и брюки, и каждый раз выглядишь по новому)
Рубашка, футболка, майка, комбинации бесконечные, а стирка одна на всю неделю 😂
👇Ссылки на вещи:
⏺️Серые брюки Torae
⏺️Черная футболка Torae
⏺️Голубая рубашка Torae
⏺️Белая рубашка Torae
⏺️Зеленая рубашка Torae
⏺️М…
Нашли этот пост? Значит вам повезло 😎
Ребята из ГАРМИНКО разыгрывают новый Garmin CIRQA
Расскажу, почему сам заинтересовался этой штукой ⬇️
Это трекер уровня Whoop, только без подписки. Носишь и забываешь, что он на руке, а он следит за стрессом, сном, всеми показателями здоровья. Заряда на 10 дней, так что о зарядке вообще не думаешь))
Профессиональные спортсмены берут его как ночной трекер вместо громоздких сма…
Ну что, пацаны, этот день настал. Встречайте! 😎
Гараж сейл, Мой рынок, Лавка Антохи, называйте как хотите 😂
t.me/horevsale
t.me/horevsale
t.me/horevsale
Все откладывал на потом, но гардероб не резиновый и вещи просто уже скоро начнут вываливаться из квартиры. Все шмотки оттуда ношены не так много, состояния достойные)
Залетайте, скоро будет ещё пополнение, а то руки все не доходили. Цены вас приятно удивят 🤝
Когда шея говорит хватит 😰
Если много времени проводишь за компьютером, в телефоне или постоянно в сидячем положении, думаю, знакомо ощущение, когда к вечеру шея и плечи становятся каменными
Я в последнее время использую массажер для шеи QYRON MN301 и, честно, это одна из тех вещей, которые сначала кажутся просто интересным гаджетом, а потом начинают реально входить в привычку)
Надел на шею, выбрал режим и букваль…
🌷После этого геля духи можно оставить дома
Я вообще люблю, когда после душа от тебя пахнет нормальным парфюмом
Попробовал гель для душа EALY с ароматом, вдохновлённым Ombré Leather, и вот это уже интереснее обычного геля
Аромат довольно долго остаётся на коже, сам гель приятно пахнет и при этом не ощущается так, будто ты только что вылил на себя полфлакона парфюма 😂
И ещё интересная деталь, в составе есть натурал…
❤13🔥10👎5👍2🤯2🤣1😎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @antonkhorev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 780,003 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пацанский уголок” (@antonkhorev), 17,334 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antonkhorev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
