Channel
@anzicheckin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
132subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002098396567 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anzicheckin |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anzicheckin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 132 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:24 | 133 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 131 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 133 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 134 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 134 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
159 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5300828136844325955 | 64 | 40.3% | |
| 👾 | 61 | 38.4% | |
| custom 5301260021575738676 | 25 | 15.7% | |
| custom 5341805947369066107 | 9 | 5.66% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anzicheckin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
я сделала очень много разного оформления на канал🤩 однако к сожалению у меня экзамены 15 и 18 августа и до этого времени я буду к ним готовиться 🤩 поэтому видео и арты я начну готовить уже после, зато их будет несколько😏
👾6custom 53008281368443259552custom 53418059473690661071
это что за кошкодевочка, новое оформление для канала кста
custom 530082813684432595510👾5custom 53418059473690661074
мы с ней как весна-лето🎁 и осень-зима🎁
custom 53008281368443259554👾1custom 53418059473690661071
гифтик для мью @tricheska🎁
custom 53008281368443259557👾4custom 53418059473690661073
ура, референс мявью 🟤🤩 по сравнению с вэй она выглядит более живо и с какой-то стороны отражает мой характер абрикосу респект за звезды🌸 #персонажиmeoweux
custom 530082813684432595511custom 53012600215757386767👾3
такой вот симпатичный коллажный спойлер спрайтика с новым персом
custom 530082813684432595512custom 53012600215757386766👾3
⤷Масштабный вент 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ✖️Таблицы Менделеева ｡˚𓂃 𓈒𓏸 подошёл к концу. Было целых ➖➖ человек Благодарим всех за участие🌟 ꒰🤩꒱Участники: 1 Водород (H) — @A_curbNoah 2 Гелий (He) — @p0sitive_vibrations 3 Литий (Li) — @apricotartchannel 4 Бериллий (Be) 5 Бор (B) — @kordi_kor 6 Углерод (C) — @Ddessgondon 7 Азот (N) — @Ecllipset 8 Кислород (O) — @sitriliss 9 Фтор (F) — @sisterlocationpizzeria 10 Неон (Ne) — @KotzArt 1…
👾7custom 53008281368443259552custom 53012600215757386761
поделюсь немножко кривым скетчем с новым персонажем 🟤
👾15custom 53008281368443259556custom 53012600215757386764
удалил(-а) вас из канала
👾8custom 53008281368443259555custom 53012600215757386763
📺 хочу видосик запилить не очень трудозатратный, что думаете? какие темы были бы вам интересны?
👾9custom 53008281368443259555custom 53012600215757386764
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @anzicheckin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@anzicheckin named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“meoweux🍁” (@anzicheckin), 132 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anzicheckin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.