Channel
@aphelionconference
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
157subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003555738764 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aphelionconference |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aphelionconference |
@aphelionconference was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 157 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 166 | +10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 156 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 156 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Осторожно! Эта смесь сбивает с ног. 🌟 SEDUCTION and APHELION 🌟 🌟Дерзкий характер, яркий вкус и полное отсутствие компромиссов. Эта коллаборация — как дерзкий комплимент от незнакомца: неожиданно, приятно и хочется повторить. 🌟Мы не спрашиваем, готов ли ты. Мы просто даём попробовать. А там уже не остановишься.
будни чата.
Будем рады, если вы подпишитесь на блог владельца и совладельца🌼 Блог владельца Мако Лавински Блог совладельца Рэна Лерманн
✨правила✨ ⬜✨контакты✨ ⬜⬜✨инициалы✨
Полезные контакты: — наш тик ток 🌟 — канал с видео 🎀
⬜
Инициалы: при вступлении в конференцию обязательны инициалы в ник, либо в био: примеры: ᵃᵖʰ, ᵃᵒⁿ, 𝖺𝗉𝗁𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗈𝗇, 𝖺𝗉𝗁
⬜
ᴏᴡɴᴇʀ: @renesent ꜱᴏ-ᴏᴡɴᴇʀ: @Kaylen01
⬜
𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑝𝑠𝑒 Он появляется как затмение: без предупреждения, без объяснений, с холодной точностью космического расписания. Там, где große rote Fleck вращает реальность в ураган, Eclipse выключает шум. Не гасит — просто перекрывает. Как будто у мира на секунду забрали голос. Он спокоен до неестественности. Не потому что внутри тишина, а потому что всё лишнее уже давно вырезано. Эмоции у него не вспыхивают — они проходят м…
⬜
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @aphelionconference. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@aphelionconference named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴀᴘʜᴇʟɪᴏɴ ᴄᴏɴꜰᴇʀᴇɴᴄᴇ ɪɴꜰᴏ” (@aphelionconference), 157 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aphelionconference.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.