Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +218. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,814–9,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 00:18
9,065
+36
14 Sept 2026, 23:38
9,029
+66
11 Sept 2026, 07:21
8,963
+36
6 Sept 2026, 22:39
8,927
-9
2 Sept 2026, 12:06
8,936
+15
30 Aug 2026, 15:03
8,921
+20
27 Aug 2026, 05:47
8,901
-7
24 Aug 2026, 00:39
8,908
+9
20 Aug 2026, 01:17
8,899
+12
16 Aug 2026, 17:52
8,887
+4
13 Aug 2026, 00:34
8,883
+17
10 Aug 2026, 08:12
8,866
+16
7 Aug 2026, 13:11
8,850
+3
6 Aug 2026, 21:45
8,847
no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:34
8,847
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 3 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.4%
avg views ÷ 9,065 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,850
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
28 (3 March 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
8,540
Reactions total
396
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
4,369 reactions across 28 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🏆
4,369
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
57
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 28 we hold a reading for · 68%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aqlli_ikkichi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 March 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Erkinlikni xohlasangiz, stabillikdan voz kechishingiz kerak.
Biznes yoki freelance qilasiz — qancha pul topishingiz noma’lum.
Stabillikni xohlasangiz, erkinlikdan voz kechishingiz kerak.
Har oy maosh olasiz, lekin kompaniya belgilagan ishlarni qilasiz.
Bittada ikkalasini ham to‘liq tanlab bo‘lmaydi.
Nimanidir olish uchun, nimanidir yo‘qotish kerak.
Bittasi yaxshi, ikkinchisi yomon degan gap yo‘q.
Shunchaki, o‘…
Pulingiz yo‘qligida motivatsiya topish juda oson.
Qorin och, yegingiz keladi. Majbur qimirlaysiz.
Mashina&uy olganingizdan keyin esa eng haqiqiy o‘yin boshlanadi.
Chunki B nuqtada turib, C nuqtani ko‘ra olmaslik - eng katta muammo.
Atrofimda birinchi kichik muvaffaqiyatga erishib, keyin nima qilishni bilmay qolgan odamlar ko‘p.
Hamma narsasi bor. Puli yetadi. Lekin bundan ko‘proq ishlashdan ma’no ko‘rmaydi.
Aga…
2–3 kishi testosteron mavzusini o‘z talqinida tushuntiryapti va hamma bunga ishonib qolyapti.
Ko‘chada kimdan so‘ramang, o‘zini emotsional yoki “ayol kabi” tutadigan odamlarning testosteroni past, o‘ziga ishongan va qomati chiroyli insonlarning testosteroni esa baland, degan fikrni eshitasiz.
Demak, ular — “haqiqiy erkaklar”.
Murakkab mavzularni haddan tashqari soddalashtirib yuborish bilan kun kechiryapmiz. Vahol…
Apple mahsulotlarining O‘zbekistondagi eng yirik sotuvchilaridan biri — Smartlife rebrending qildi.
Menga yangi dizayn yoqdi.
Men texnikani bozordan emas, doim Smartlife’dan xarid qilaman. Chunki bozorlarda ko‘p aldanganman.
Tarmoqlar rivojlangan sari biz, xaridorlar, faqat yutamiz. Servis yaxshilanadi, narxlar tushadi, yolg‘on kamayadi.
Ibrohimjon akaga butun mamlakat bo‘ylab 100 ta filial tilab qolaman.
Yirik kompaniyalar o‘rtasida doim kuchli raqobat bo‘lgan.
Avvallari ular raqobatda ustun kelish uchun turli usullardan foydalangan.
Har biri aynan o‘z yondashuvi eng samarali deb hisoblagan.
Bugun esa vaziyat boshqacha.
Deyarli barcha yirik kompaniyalarning asosiy quroli bitta - AI.
Yoki hamma adashyapti.
Yoki hamma nimanidirni tushundi.
@aqlli_ikkichi
«Muvaffaqiyatli insonlar doim risk qiladi»
Degan gapni ko‘p eshitganmiz. Bu gapga qo‘shilmaslikning iloji yo‘qdek. Lekin bugun shu fikrga biroz teskari bo‘lgan nazariyani taqdim qilaman.
Yangi nazariya: «Risk qilish o‘ta muhim, lekin faqat kerakli joylarda risk qilgan yaxshi».
Keraksiz joyda risk qilib, arzimagan mukofot uchun katta yo‘qotishga uchrashingiz mumkin.
Agar katta yo‘qotish ehtimoli atigi 1% bo‘lsa ha…
Sun’iy intellekt eng zo‘r multiplikatorga aylandi.
Men uni istalgan narsani 5X kuchaytiradi deb baholayapman.
Formula shunday: Natija = Mutaxassis × AI
Ya’ni, hozir AI yaxshi mutaxassisni 5 baravar kuchliroq qilishi mumkin.
Lekin ko‘paytirish tenglamasida mutaxassisning o‘zi ham muhim.
Agar mutaxassisning qobiliyati 0 bo‘lsa, AI uni 100X kuchaytirsa ham, natija baribir 0 bo‘ladi.
Hozir men ko‘p kuzatayotgan hol…
2005-yilda Kaliforniyada bir eksperiment uchun uysiz Ted Rodrigue’ga $100 000 beriladi
Ted 20 yildan beri ko‘chada chiqindi yig‘ib kun ko‘rib kelgan. Endi esa qo‘lida katta pul bor.
Balki uning hayoti endi butunlay o‘zgarib ketadi, deb o‘ylarsiz.
Lekin Ted pulni boshqacha sarflay boshlaydi.
Birinchi navbatda $35 000 ga Dodge Ram sotib oladi. Keyin sevgan qiziga ham mashina olib beradi. Uy, kiyim-kechak, turli xar…
Bizda 2 xil qobiliyat bor: hard skill va soft skill.
Hard skill — kasbiy ko‘nikmalar. Ya’ni biror kasb yoki hunarni bilish. Masalan, dasturlarda ishlashni bilish, moliyaviy hisob-kitob qilish, biror mahsulot yaratish yoki texnik ishni bajarish.
Soft skill — shaxsiy va ijtimoiy ko‘nikmalar. Odamlar bilan ishlashga yordam beradigan qobiliyatlar. Masalan, yaxshi muomala qilish, mas’uliyatli bo‘lish, va’daga amal qilis…
O‘zbek tilidagi o‘zgarishlar haqida eshitdingizmi?
«G‘», «O‘», «Sh» va «Ch» harflarini o‘zgartirishni taklif qilishyapti.
“Ğ”, “Ö”, “Ş” va “Ç” harflar joriy qilinishi ko’rib chiqilyapti.
Ularning aytishicha, hozir bu harflar lotin alifbosida ikki belgi bilan yozilgani uchun ikkita harf o‘rnini egallaydi.
Til doim o‘zgarib boradi. Undagi qoidalarning yangilanib borishi, yangi qoidalarning qo‘shilishi tabiiy va nor…
"Yangi avlod aynigan, ularning qo‘lidan hech narsa kelmaydi"
Bu odatiy holat: eski avlod o‘zidan keyingi avlodni deyarli har doim tanqid qiladi.
Ularning fikricha, yangi avlodda ko‘proq qulayliklar paydo bo‘lgan va shu sabab ular dangasa bo‘lib qolgan.
Aslida esa bu yangilik emas. Hatto Aristotel ham o‘z shogirdlarini dangasa deb hisoblagan. Sababi, ular ma'lumotlarni yod olish o‘rniga yozib borishni boshlagan eka…
🏆196
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @aqlli_ikkichi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Aziz Rahimov @azizrakhimov_blog · 59,831 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Abdusattor @abdusattor · 59,489 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
Bek Olimjon @DrBekOlimjon · 28,760 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
Foydali Moliya @foydali_moliya · 53,015 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 August 2026
Asror Iskandarov | Shaxsiy Brend Qurish @asroriskandarovshb · 23,668 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
Ibrahim Gulyamov @ibrahimGulyamov · 25,582 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
Mubosharat @Mubosharat · 30,322 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 7 September 2026
ustozation @ustozation · 36,501 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
Muhammad Ali | Rasmiy Blog @Muhammadali_Eshonqulov · 58,024 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Alisher Isaev blogi @AlisherIsaev_blogi · 42,346 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
Ustoz AI @ustozai · 54,465 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
“Yoshlar — kelajagimiz” jamg‘armasi @ykfoundation · 31,669 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Murphy by Mr.English @MurphyMrENGLISH · 24,025 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aqlli ikkichi” (@aqlli_ikkichi), 9,065 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aqlli_ikkichi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.