Channel
@araepic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
141subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001716216047 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @araepic |
| Created | 13 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/araepic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 141 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 140 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 139 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 139 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 138 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
101 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 49.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 19.8% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 9.90% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 5.94% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 3.96% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 2.97% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.98% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 1.98% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.99% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Меня очень порадовала реакция на прошлый пост, неожиданно много людей написали в личку. И помимо прочего писали о недостаточном пиаре и моей замкнутости на ближнем круге, о том, что нужно шире и активнее пробиваться. Я вижу, как это сделать, по крайней мере в теории. Но понимаю, что некоторым идеям нужно дозреть: и не просто полежать на полочке, пока занимаешься чем-то еще, а активно нарастить объем подобно кристалл…
❤7🔥4🤓2
Но ничего, корректируем планы и работаем дальше, движемся ..
💯4👍1
🎊 Ты можешь готовиться сколько угодно, но все равно не пройдешь проверку реальностью (если начинаешь что-то принципиально новое) 🎊 ▫️Полтора года назад я ушла из найма В последний год работы я проходила доп. обучения по фотографии, читала карьерных коучей, составила план запуска своего продукта и создала дополнительную финансовую подушку. У меня была поддержка близких. Я решила, что готова! ▫️Но красивого рестарта…
❤8🕊4⚡2💔1
И третья подборка, чудесный розовый 🤍
❤🔥10❤7😘1
🩵 Следующая подборочка 🤍
❤7❤🔥2
🪼 Визуальная поэзия 🪼 У меня в телефоне много спонтанных фотографий. Лет десять назад я придумала сёрфить их в приложении для создания коллажей и делать ироничные квадратные диптихи. Как правило, там терялся изначальный смысл каждого фото - в пользу визуальной загадки, которая получалась в итоге. Сейчас я от этого подустала, но с картиночками по-прежнему хочу что-то делать. Сейчас я много работаю с сериями, поэтому…
❤5❤🔥4🔥3⚡1
Важно отпускать то, что не работает. 🐚 Я готовилась ко встрече с Настей и просто сгорала от нетерпения: я красотка, и мне пришла гениальная идея! Мы снимем Настю в образе фридайвера, который ныряет в книжные стеллажи за жемчугом идей. Интеллектуальный труд и преподавание – это буквально вылавливание знаний из глубин, чтобы затем поделиться ими! Я понимала, что это будет условная сцена – без дорисовки подводного мира…
❤7💯2🙏1
Жемчуг идей 🐚🐚 Съемка для преподавательницы и пловчихи Насти Дмитриевской о связи и работе со знанием. Одна моя коллега сказала, что не видит здесь истории. Спасибо ей за то, что она напомнила: рассказать историю понятно и доступно - это целая наука. Я сейчас много об этом думаю и учусь. ✨ Но есть еще свобода интерпретаций. Поделитесь, что вы видите в этой съемке, какие вам приходят мысли?
❤9❤🔥4🔥3🐳1💔1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @araepic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Раевская Фото” (@araepic), 141 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/araepic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.