Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for draft.

Channel

draft.

@arcanefeelings

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

921subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001430679045
TypeChannel
Username@arcanefeelings
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/arcanefeelings

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9219459336 August 2026 — 945 subscribers6 August 2026 — 945 subscribers12 August 2026 — 942 subscribers18 August 2026 — 933 subscribers26 August 2026 — 930 subscribers1 September 2026 — 926 subscribers10 September 2026 — 925 subscribers19 September 2026 — 921 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 44 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 917–949 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:36921-4
10 Sept 2026, 18:00925-1
1 Sept 2026, 16:59926-4
26 Aug 2026, 05:58930-3
18 Aug 2026, 23:25933-9
12 Aug 2026, 10:48942-3
6 Aug 2026, 13:50945no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:57945first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3384.6%
😢410.3%
🕊12.56%
🫡12.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC88 viewsread 6 August 2026

I want a mature conversation during miscommunication, I want transparency, I want soft explanation. I hate it when he raise his voice at me, I hate it when he curse me, I hate it when he is being mean

Signed D

20 Jul 2026, 17:07 UTC89 viewsread 6 August 2026

I want a soft gentle love so bad. I don't want love that based on lust, I don't want love that bring us down, I don't want love that is hard to carry, I don't want love that make my heart physically hurt. I just don't want that

Signed D

20 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC90 viewsread 6 August 2026

Which is sucks because it wasn't their fault and there's nothing they can do. And there's nothing I can do too so I just staring at my own self and questioning myself

Signed D

20 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC90 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

I have too many love to give but the person I'm willing to pour all my love to doesn't have the ability to give back the same love that I gave

3

Signed D

11 Feb 2026, 16:37 UTC358 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

How can you broke her and sleep in the night

9

Signed D

11 Feb 2026, 16:37 UTC351 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

How can you say something like that to a person who love you endlessly?

3

Signed D

25 Jan 2026, 17:46 UTC446 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Serious la I'm being treated like that?

3🫡1

Signed D

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arcanefeelings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“draft.” (@arcanefeelings), 921 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arcanefeelings.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.