Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Felix Vuitton 🪦

Channel

Felix Vuitton 🪦

@arcfelix

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,630subscribers

-255 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001654451772
TypeChannel
Username@arcfelix
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/arcfelix

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,6303,8853,757.57 August 2026 — 3,885 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,885 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,881 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,869 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,825 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,809 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,790 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,774 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,756 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,727 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,697 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,673 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,655 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,630 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -255. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,592–3,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 01:213,630-25
12 Sept 2026, 08:013,655-18
8 Sept 2026, 12:573,673-24
3 Sept 2026, 00:053,697-30
30 Aug 2026, 13:243,727-29
27 Aug 2026, 23:553,756-18
24 Aug 2026, 19:073,774-16
21 Aug 2026, 04:143,790-19
17 Aug 2026, 20:053,809-16
15 Aug 2026, 05:163,825-44
11 Aug 2026, 12:553,869-12
8 Aug 2026, 03:323,881-4
7 Aug 2026, 13:033,885no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:513,885first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 21 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 9 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arcfelix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 March 2026 to 3 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Apr 2026, 21:39 UTC≈4,420 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/+Ik92OQHDpOA5Zjg6 Кому интересно вот мой приват

3 Apr 2026, 21:36 UTC≈4,500 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Решение далось очень тяжело и даже сейчас писать об этом тяжело,Архив закрывается. За эти 3 года многое изменилось: что-то пришло в мою жизнь, а что-то, наоборот, ушло. Этот канал стал для меня чем-то по-настоящему ценным, а вы — моей маленькой семьёй 🤍 Но всему приходит конец. Сейчас я понимаю, что у меня больше нет того интереса и огня к архиву и к-попу, которые были раньше. Я безумно благодарна каждому из вас за т

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @arcfelix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

STAAA🏁
@staaa0220 · 102,364
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 15 August 2026
Мир Stray Kids
@straykids_d8 · 28,725
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Felix Vuitton 🪦” (@arcfelix), 3,630 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arcfelix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.