Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for aDNA & Archaeology

Channel

aDNA & Archaeology

@archaeogenetics

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004312351438
TypeChannel
Username@archaeogenetics
Created5 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/archaeogenetics

Growth

131614.56 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–16 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 05:5716+2
22 Aug 2026, 23:3414+1
12 Aug 2026, 03:3013no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:0013first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩1568.2%
👍522.7%
🔥29.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC639 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Хронология динамики населения в Циркум-Уральском регионе

👍5

11 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC138 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Доли предковых компонентов неолитической группы, рассчитанные с помощью qpAdm. POT = Полутепе, MB = Масис Блур, Akn = Акнашен Genome-wide analysis of a collective grave from Mentesh Tepe provides insight into the population structure of early neolithic population in the South Caucasus

🔥2

11 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC135 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @caucasdnaPhoto

Карта древних образцов ДНК, показывающих генетическое происхождение кавказских охотников-собирателей (CHG) из археолог. памятников 12-2 тысячелетий до н.э. на Кавказе и прилегающих территориях, а также ядра основных археологических культур региона 6-7 тыс. лет назад, энеолит Кавказа (Fig. 1A.): ⚱️ Дарквети-Мешоко ⚱️ Шулавери-Шомутепе Цифры обозначают палеоДНК образцы и указаны в Таб. 1 [1]. Источник: [1] Trifonov,

💩2

8 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC120 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐂 Maykop Culture Майкопская культура – археол. культура бронзового века, существовавшая 5000-5700 лет назад [1] на Западном Кавказе. 🗡️Согласно исследованиям палеоДНК из Майкопской культуры [2], её население пришло юга Кавказа и являлось потомками земледельцев эпохи энеолита, известных как Дарквети-Мешоко, которые первыми колонизировали северные склоны Кавказа. Таким образом, Майкоп: «идеальный археологический кан

💩2

8 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC114 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HereditasGeneticsPhoto

📊Qpadm breakdown of sample from Chalcolitic Armenia (Areni cave) : 🌾Masis Blur-like source-67.8% 🏹Caucasus Lower Volga Cline-32.2% 🗒️Outsources: "Mbuti.DG","Ethiopia_4500BP.AG","Russia_UstIshim_IUP.DG","Russia_Kostenki14_UP.SG","Belgium_Magdalenian.AG",'Russia_MA1_UP.SG',"Italy_Epigravettian.SG","Turkey_Central_Pinarbasi_Epipaleolithic.AG","Iran_Wezmeh_N.SG","Georgia_Kotias_Mesolithic.SG","Morocco_Iberomaurusian.AG"

💩2

8 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC89 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @circassianftdnaPhoto

Chalcolithic period in Caucasus 4300-3500 BC Chaff Faced Ware It was stretched from Cilicia to Caspian sea. This cultural horizon is the common denominator of Minoan Y-DNA and Maykop Y-DNA. Their common ancestor. One group moved to north from South Caucasus were a variant of this culture is known as Leila-Tepe. In the north they participated to the formation of Maykop culture. While another group moved to Crete and

💩2

7 Jul 2026, 20:49 UTC78 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @circassianftdnaPhoto

⚱️Культура Шулавери-Шомутепе Географическое положение поселений, с 6000 по 5000 г. до н.э. Считается, что эта культура возникла вскоре после резкого похолодания 6200 г. до н. э., продолжавшегося около двух столетий. Предшествует Куро-Аракской культуре.

💩2

7 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC91 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HereditasGeneticsPhoto

🧬qpAdm model of Kura-Araxes culture The Kura–Araxes culture can be modelled as deriving the majority of its ancestry from the Shulaveri–Shomu cultural horizon, represented in this dataset by the Mentesh Tepe sample (67.7% ± 4.32%). The material culture of Shulaveri–Shomu, like that of many Neolithic populations in the South Caucasus, exhibits notable parallels with Near Eastern Neolithic traditions, particularly the

💩2

5 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC79 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1. Хронология образцов: Иран/Туран, Анатолия 2. Результаты анализа ADMIXTURE, где зеленый, бирюзовый, оранжевый, красный и синий цвета представляют предковые компоненты, максимизированные соответственно у иранских фермеров из Загроса, фермеров из Анатолии, а также охотников-собирателей из Западной Сибири, Южной Азии и Западной Европы

💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @archaeogenetics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“aDNA & Archaeology” (@archaeogenetics), 16 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archaeogenetics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.