Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шпилька архитекторки

Channel

Шпилька архитекторки

@archispilka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,363subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001644019937
TypeChannel
Username@archispilka
Created5 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/archispilka

Growth

4,3174,3634,3406 August 2026 — 4,317 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,317 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,323 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,329 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,339 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,338 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,343 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,340 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,343 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,350 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,359 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,363 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,310–4,370 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 01:554,363+4
1 Sept 2026, 19:054,359+9
30 Aug 2026, 00:564,350+7
27 Aug 2026, 03:354,343+3
24 Aug 2026, 07:094,340-3
20 Aug 2026, 06:354,343+5
17 Aug 2026, 12:334,338-1
14 Aug 2026, 07:274,339+10
10 Aug 2026, 13:044,329+6
7 Aug 2026, 05:054,323+6
6 Aug 2026, 05:304,317no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:234,317first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

142 reactions across 5 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4330.3%
👍2920.4%
🔥2517.6%
😢1812.7%
👏128.45%
🥰64.23%
🙏32.11%
😡21.41%
👎10.704%
💯10.704%
😁10.704%
😱10.704%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC≈3,980 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Другие берега С воды Петербург выглядит иначе и осознается как морской город. Открывшийся фарватер с яхтами и парусами на время прощает многое в построенной квартирографии обещанном "Морском фасаде". Именно отсюда понимаешь, насколько гениальной была идея стадиона Александра Никольского - с чашей, утопленной в искусственном зелёном холме. На последних иллюстрациях – его перспективы "стадиона-холма" со стороны залив

👍16🔥137🥰6👏1

1 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC755 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Попытка подытожить этот не самый позитивный пост (и увидеть что-то положительное) Сейчас стало заметно, как параллельно — буквально не пересекаясь — существуют две тенденции. С одной стороны, работа с историческим наследием популяризируется, интересна архитекторам и становится неотъемлемой частью проектирования. Тема наследия заявлена в программе «Архитекторы. р ф», поддерживается Минстроем, и много говорится о по

6👍6🙏3👏2😁1

31 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC663 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏛️ Если вам интересен Петербург не просто как вид с открытки, а как живой город - с удачными решениями и с противоречиями, то эта папка для вас. В ней – каналы об урбанистике, архитектуре, транспорте, документах и городской культуре, которые помогают разобраться в происходящем немного лучше. 🟢 Вороньи мысли — про урбанистику в России и Санкт-Петербурге, личном опыте городских проектов и происходящем вокруг. ⚫️ urba

11👍2👏2👎1💯1

29 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC708 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

День Тигра в Приозерске 29 июля в мире отмечают День Тигра. Наверное, поэтому кот Елисей, сотрудник музея-крепости Корела, выглядел слегка уставшим и позировал недолго. Сам музей с моего последнего приезда заметно изменился. Часть валунов облицовки бастиона и Порохового погреба обрушились ещё в 2021, стены законсервировали, и по куртинам крепости уже нельзя вольно разгуливать, как прежде. Подозреваю, что активность

17👍5🔥2👏1

25 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC≈10,100 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Изменения в законодательстве по сохранению архитектурного наследия. Наверное, многим известно: в законодательстве по сохранению архитектурного наследия происходят серьёзные изменения. Сложившаяся за четверть века практика перестраивается - и, к сожалению, не в пользу памятников. Вместе с историком и специалистом по ОКН Екатериной Тюриной мы подготовили карточки о самых важных изменениях: уже вступивших в силу с мар

😢18🔥10👏62😡2😱1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @archispilka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Строй Надзор | Питер ЛО
@stroyLO · 65,865
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
Деньги и песец
@moneyandpolarfox · 50,999
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шпилька архитекторки” (@archispilka), 4,363 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archispilka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.