Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
архив elmaz flood
@archivelmazflood
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003881088118 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @archivelmazflood |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 22 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/archivelmazflood |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 2 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 27
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 25
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 19s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🎀➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖🎀 ✧─── ・ 。゚★: *.✦ .* :★. ───✧ — Два прекрасных проекта решили объединиться и образовать новый союз..!🤩 ∘₊✧──────✧₊∘ @sakura_flood & @elmaz ✧─── ・ 。゚★: *.✦ .* :★. ───✧ будем надеяться на взаимовыгодное сотрудничество, которое продлится долго, которое поможет достичь проектам хороших результатов!🤩
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔤nion From now on, you and me are not connected forever. #union
Sticker, posted without a caption
⚠️🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟👤 🌟 🤍herry jam 🤩🪦🪦🪦🪦 🪦🪦🪦🪦 & 🫧🤍lmaz сегодня на хорошей прогулке мы нашли милых котят.мы покормили их сладкой клубникой. надеемся на долгий, крепкий союз, а главное дружный союз🌟
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sωιpє.ɕσм 🍼 ηєω υηιση Мразu на связu, на mpyбke np𐐫сmumymku ➿➖➿➖➿➖➿➖➿➖ Сегоցня, ցва nреkрасных флуgа заkлючuлu gружесkuй союз. Наgеемся на gолгое соmруgнuчесmво. ѕωιρє & уσυ
Sticker, posted without a caption
𝘕𝘌𝘞 𝘜𝘕𝘐𝘖𝘕 с сегодняшнего дня 02.06 заключился новый союз между: elmaz flood и kookis flood надеемся на долгое сотрудничество!!
Sticker, posted without a caption
| N𝖾𝗐 𝐔𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 . . zz 𝗆𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗒𝗈𝗎 - 𝖺𝗅𝗐𝖺𝗒𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 ! с этого дня, два чудесных флуда, заключили дружеский союз.мы очень рады союзу и надеемся на долгий союз ! 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲 : 𝗢𝟮.𝗢𝟲 - 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 !
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @archivelmazflood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Demonflood97 · 631 postЗАКРЫТЫ @ 𝗔𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗅𝗂𝗌 . . !
@auralis_fld · 121 post♡ᡴꪫ chꫀׁׅܻ݊ჩry⃕ ჟam ׂׂׂׂૢ་༘࿐
@cherryjam_flood · 8471 postрест влд +𝟣𝟥 Lʋɤⅈɛʂ iɳƒσ ᡴꪫ . .
@luviesinfo · 931 postСЗРП В ЛС sᥲkᥙrᥲ_𝖿ᥣ᥆᥆ძ | инфо
@sakura_flood01 · 1931 post+048 * SW𝐈𝐏E 𝐟𝐥d 빛
@swipefld048 · 701 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@elmazflood · 198 posts♡ᡴꪫ chꫀׁׅܻ݊ჩry⃕ ჟam ׂׂׂׂૢ་༘࿐
@cherryjam_flood · 8471 postЗаморозка | INFO | 𝑫𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒏 𝒇𝒍𝒐𝒐𝒅😍🦶
@Demonflood97 · 631 postᴋᴏᴏᴋɪs ғʟᴏᴏᴅ ⁱⁿᶠᵒ
@kikifloodinfo1 · 271 postрест влд +𝟣𝟥 Lʋɤⅈɛʂ iɳƒσ ᡴꪫ . .
@luviesinfo · 931 post` 🎈 𝓢𝓪𝓴𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓯𝓵𝓸𝓸𝓭 🍓 `/ (info)
@sakura_flood · 91 postСЗРП В ЛС sᥲkᥙrᥲ_𝖿ᥣ᥆᥆ძ | инфо
@sakura_flood01 · 1931 post𝒲elwe flood (info)
@Welweflood · 421 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@archivelmazflood named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026 · confirmed gone 28 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“архив elmaz flood” (@archivelmazflood), 2 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archivelmazflood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.