Channel
@archivessunna
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
104subscribers
+30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003576066786 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @archivessunna |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 25 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/archivessunna |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 104 | +4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 100 | +12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 88 | +9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 79 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 73 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 74 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 74 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅Глава из «Сунны» Абдуллаха ибн Ахмада с тахкыком шейха Адиля, где имам собрал высказывания своего отца и других саляфов об абу Ханифе. Подробное изложение заблуждений ханафитов и основателя ханафитского мазхаба. Даже если небольшая часть в этом вопросе - ошибка и непонимание Абу Ханифы типа асара про сандали или мясо дикой свиньи, это не отменяет основную часть достоверных обоснованных асаров ➡️ Кнопка вступления…
👍1
✅ Аль-Ашари и его последователи не познали Таухид 📚 Сказал шейх уль Ислам Ибн Теймия: "Люди каляма подразумевают по словом "Таухид" и словом "Единый Бог", в своей терминологии то, у чего нет Сыфатов, и от чего не известно что-то в отличие от чего то другого, и то, что невозможно увидеть. Что же касается Таухида с которым пришли Посланники, то он вообще не несет в себе этих отрицаний, а несет в себе лишь утверждени…
❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Подумайте какой комплекс неполноценности кроется у некоторых мусульман с Кавказа что они такого зиндика который почти открыто над ними издевается - сажают себе на шею, и выставляют "исламским интеллектуалом" - лишь потому что это белый западный человек Почитайте вообще его фейсбук, как ему многие пишут в ответ на очередной куфр типа: "Мы не поняли что тут написано но видимо что то важное", и тд
Sticker, posted without a caption
🙏1
Понятно что Абу Умар не пантеист. Речь о неразборчивости, о равнодушии к убеждениям, об объединении со всеми подряд
Sticker, posted without a caption
Чел открыто признает что его нынешняя деятельность - это постмодернизм Постмодернизм это деконструкция, он прав: посты про регги-Ислам это типичная деконструкция Ислама Видимо, он (русский фашист) себе представляет это как то что он стебется над чурками тупыми а они его уважают
Sticker, posted without a caption
Я не шучу. Многие подумали это троллинг сарказм и тд
Sticker, posted without a caption
У этих людей очень хорошие связи, если со мной что то случится знайте почему это случилось и чьих рук дело и за слово истины в чей адрес я пострадал
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @archivessunna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Люди Сунны и хадиса live - архив” (@archivessunna), 104 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archivessunna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.