Channel
@arctrenchescom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003965979737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arctrenchescom |
| Created | 8 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arctrenchescom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:53 | 19 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 18 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 14 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 12 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
18 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 22.2% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 22.2% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 22.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Interesting one 👀 Reth Exchange reached out to me after seeing how I pushed Malachite. Their token hasn’t launched yet, but the utility is already live. According to the team, launching a token isn’t their biggest concern right now — having a working product is. That caught my attention. Product first. Token later. I’ll be watching Reth Exchange closely from here. Telegram: https://t.me/RethSwapfinance X: https…
🔥3
Who the hell selling mala at this stage, Fuvk you Why sell this low, wtf wrong with you guys.. mala should be sitting above $100k now
😁1
Architects on Arc just broke $2.2M market cap — I got in around $1.6M anyway. 👀 Meanwhile, Malachite ($MALA) is still sitting at just $27K market cap. You can choose to position early or FOMO later. 💚 Arc mainnet isn’t even live yet, and the trenches are already printing hard. 🔥 The opportunity is there. The choice is yours.
🔥3
💚 FINDING IT HARD TO BUY $MALA? I believe Malachite ($MALA) can reach millions in market cap once Arc mainnet opens up. Do you know why? Because $MALA has one of the biggest stories on Arc — a piece of Arc’s history that nobody can erase or take away. Take your time and go through the Arc docs; you’ll understand exactly why I’m shilling my bag in $MALA. One of the biggest reasons $MALA isn’t sitting at $300K+ alr…
❤2
Malachite $MALA IS FLYING! 💚🔥 FIRST EVER CALL ON ARCTRENCHES — AND MALACHITE IS ALREADY SURGING! 🚀 We’re positioning BEFORE Arc mainnet while the trenches are still early. High risk. Early conviction. 👀 MAY THE BEST MEME WIN. 🫡🔥 CA: 0x4f7dc89dc44ad08c20d9680d2ee9cfad69bfda55 Chart: https://radardex.pro/#0x4f7dc89dc44ad08c20d9680d2ee9cfad69bfda55
🚨 DON’T FADE MY CALLS. First alpha shared from the Arc trenches. 👀 Scanning through the streets of Arc, I found this gem — Malachite ($MALA). 💚 Strong narrative. Still sitting around $15K market cap. I believe this one has serious potential. Keep your eyes on it. 👀🔥 CA: 0x4f7dc89dc44ad08c20d9680d2ee9cfad69bfda55 Chart: https://radardex.pro/#0x4f7dc89dc44ad08c20d9680d2ee9cfad69bfda55
GM Jackie friends 🧡 Alpha coming today on Arc. 👀🔥 Get your USDC ready on ARC — we’re going hunting. 🎯
🥰2❤1
I am glad I didn’t share the tokens I bought yesterday on Arc blockchain with you all 😂 I put about $600 into 4 different projects… and lost it all. LOL 💀 Sometimes the alpha hunter becomes the exit liquidity. 😂
😁3🥰2❤1
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @arctrenchescom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ARCTRENCHES.COM” (@arctrenchescom), 19 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arctrenchescom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.