جلسه پنجم (کالبد عِلّی) از مینی دوره رایگان ✅کالبد های روحی بدن😍 ____ @arezujazb368|معجزه.زندگی
❤32🥰4🕊3🤩1

Channel
@arezujazb368
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
44,408subscribers
-1,387 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001884460511 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arezujazb368 |
| Description | اگر دعوت شدی به اینجا😃بدون خدامیخوادمعجزه ای بهت هدیه بده😍❤️ فکرتو عوض کن زندگیت خودش عوض میشه✅️ نتایج کانال :👇 @arezuresult ایدی شخصی خانم جوکار برای پرسیدن سوالات👇 @aramesh3321 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arezujazb368 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:42 | 44,408 | -126 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 44,534 | -90 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 44,624 | -53 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 44,677 | -51 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:23 | 44,728 | -41 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 44,769 | -35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 44,804 | -23 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 44,827 | -49 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 44,876 | -44 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 44,920 | -60 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 44,980 | -35 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 45,015 | -40 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 45,055 | -77 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 45,132 | -66 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 45,198 | -65 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 45,263 | -42 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 45,305 | -30 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 45,335 | -43 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 45,378 | -85 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 45,463 | first reading |
262 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 262 (5 August 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
| Views total | 395,148 |
| Reactions total | 15,020 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Sept 2026, 00:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19,063 reactions across 261 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13,950 | 73.2% | |
| 👍 | 1,440 | 7.55% | |
| 👏 | 900 | 4.72% | |
| 🥰 | 660 | 3.46% | |
| 🔥 | 504 | 2.64% | |
| 🤩 | 418 | 2.19% | |
| 🙏 | 254 | 1.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 193 | 1.01% | |
| 😁 | 141 | 0.74% | |
| 🤷♀ | 113 | 0.593% | |
| 🕊 | 95 | 0.498% | |
| 👌 | 93 | 0.488% | |
| 😇 | 55 | 0.289% | |
| 🎉 | 54 | 0.283% | |
| 😍 | 50 | 0.262% | |
| 🤝 | 43 | 0.226% | |
| 💯 | 29 | 0.152% | |
| 😘 | 21 | 0.11% | |
| 🤗 | 20 | 0.105% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 0.047% | |
| 6 further kinds | 21 | 0.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 262 of the 262 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,063 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 262 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جلسه پنجم (کالبد عِلّی) از مینی دوره رایگان ✅کالبد های روحی بدن😍 ____ @arezujazb368|معجزه.زندگی
❤32🥰4🕊3🤩1
⁉️آمادهای برای یک تغییر عمیق؟😃 ✨ فایل صوتی جدید: «کالبد پنجم؛ بازنویسی کتاب سرنوشت» امشب راس ⏰ساعت 21:00⏰ داخل همین کانال قرار میگیره! 🎧 توی این فایل چند دقیقهای: 💎 یاد میگیری چطور کدهای تکراریِ زندگیات رو بشناسی. 💎 تمرین ذهنیِ تغییر مدار سرنوشت رو انجام میدیم. 💎 و در آخر یک مراقبهی بسیار عمیق برای اتصال به خرد درون داری. 🎧هندزفری رو بزن، نور اتاق رو کم کن 💡 و با آرامش به این فایل صوتیِ امشب گوش بده.👂 ✌️ …
❤53🤩4👍3
⁉️چطور میتونیم کالبد پنجممون رو پاکسازی و بازنویسی کنیم؟😍 با این ۳ قدم ساده: ✅ ۱ شناخت الگو: اول بدون ترس، الگوی تکراری زندگیت رو پیدا کن. ✅ ۲ مسئولیتپذیری: بپذیر که این الگو رو یک روزی ناخودآگاه ساختی، پس الان هم قدرت تغییرش رو داری. ✅ ۳ نوشتن کد جدید (جایگزین): جملهی کهنه رو دور بریز و با یک جملهی قدرتمند جایگزین کن. مثلاً بهجای کد کهنهی: «من همیشه تو روابطم تنهام»😢 بنویس: «من لایق عشقِ امن، آرام و پا…
❤37👍7👏3🤩3🔥2
بزرگترین راز کالبد پنجم اینه🔑: همهی اتفاقاتِ بیرونِ زندگیِ تو، اول از درونِ همین لایه شکل گرفتن!😍 شغلی که داری، رابطهای که توش هستی، و حتی میزان آرامش درونت، بازتاب همون چیزیه که توی لایهی پنجمت ثبت شده. اگر تو با خودت باور داشته باشی که «من لیاقت آرامش رو ندارم»، کالبد پنجمت هم دقیقاً همون شرایط رو برات جذب میکنه.👌 ‼️ولی قانون شگفتانگیز جهان اینه: ✅کدگذاریهای قبلی، حکمِ حبس ابد رو ندارن! 😃 تو هر لحظه می…
❤33👏3🔥3🤗1🤩1
سلام عزیزدلم😍 ⁉️به این سوال که پرسیدم 👆خوب فکر کن🧠 ✅چون خیلی قشنگ میتونه کالبد پنجم رو برات جا بندازه ✅و قشنگ میتونه کمکت کنه سناریو زندگیت رو به نفع خودت بنویسی😍 ____ @arezujazb368|معجزه.زندگی
❤37🤩5✍2
امشب قبل از اینکه بخوابی، 😴 موبایل رو بگذار کنار📱 و توی سکوت به این دو تا سوال فکر کن:🧘♀ 👈۱. بزرگترین و تکراریترین چالش زندگی من چیه که مدام برمیگرده؟ 👈۲. فکر میکنی چه درس مهمی پشت این تکرارها پنهان شده؟ 🟢فردا قراره یاد بگیریم چطور میتونیم این کدهای قدیمی رو پاک کنیم و سرنوشتمون رو با دستهای خودمون بازنویسی کنیم. تا فردا، تمام کالبدهات پر از آرامش… 🌙💙
❤85👍10🎉6🤩3⚡2
بچهها،🫂 توی کالبد پنجم یکسری «کد و الگوی روحی» ثبت شده که مثل راهنمای زندگی عمل میکنن.💌 مثلاً💡 اگر توی این کالبد ثبت شده باشه که «من باید برای دوست داشته شدن سختی بکشم»، ناخودآگاه آدمهایی رو جذب میکنی که این حس رو بهت بدن.😉☺️ ⁉️خیلیها میپرسن: «چرا اینقدر رنج؟ چرا همش من؟»😟 ✅حقیقت اینه که اینها تنبیه نیستن؛ اینها درسهای روحه که تا متوجهشون نشی، روی دور تکرار میمونن.😍 ‼️اما خبر خوب اینه: تو فقط بازیگرِ…
❤74🤗5😍4⚡2🤩2
بذار خیلی ساده درس بدم؛ 👩🏫 ما تا اینجا کالبدهای فیزیکی، اتری، عاطفی و ذهنی رو شناختیم.🔍🔎 ⚠️اما کالبد پنجم (Causal Body) کالبد «عِلّی» یا همون ریشه و دلیل اصلیه!⚠️ 🌀رنگش یک آبیِ نیلیِ عمیق و کهکشانیهست. ⁉️تفاوتش با بقیه لایهها چیه؟🤔 ⚛ کالبد عاطفی میگفت الان چه حسی داری. ✴️کالبد ذهنی میگفت چه فکری تو سرته. ⚛اما کالبد پنجم میگه: دلیل اصلی و ریشهی همهی این اتفاقات و انتخابها کجاست؟😍 تمام درسهای روح، استع…
❤47👏11🤩2
بذار درسهای امروز رو با یک سوال شروع کنم😍 ⁉️یه سوال ازت دارم؛ تا حالا به این فکر کردی که چرا بعضی از اتفاقات، آدمها یا شکستها مدام توی زندگیات تکرار میشن؟! 🤔 ✅انگار یه سناریوی از پیشتعیینشده وجود داره که هرچقدر جلو میری، دوباره همون مدل رابطه، همون مدل مشکلات یا همون حس ناامیدی سراغت میاد.🤦♀ ⁉️تا حالا حس کردی یه دستی پشت پردهست که داره این بازی رو هدایت میکنه؟😜 ✅اگه جوابت مثبته، یعنی وقتشه که با عمیقتر…
👍42❤21🤩4
*جلسه چهارم از مینی دوره رایگان ✅کالبد های روحی بدن😍 ____ @arezujazb368|معجزه.زندگی*
❤41🤩11🥰3
آمادهای کنترل تلویزیون ذهنت رو دست بگیری و این فایلهای قدیمی رو پاک کنی؟ 😃😃✨ 🎙️ وویس جلسه چهارم (کالبد ذهنی) رو امشب راس⏰ ساعت 21:00⏰ میذارم واست👌 توی این فایل قراره یاد بگیری: ✅ چطور افکار تکراری و منفی رو متوقف کنی. ✅تکنیک بازنویسی باورهای محدودکننده 📝 ✅ مراقبهٔ کوتاه «کانال سکوت» برای آرامش فوری ذهن 🧘♀️ هندزفریت رو بذار و با آرامش گوش بده؛ امشب قراره کالبد ذهنت رو پاکسازی کنیم 🎧🧠🤍😍
❤60🤝4🤩4🙏2
⁉️فایل بالا رو گوش کردی؟😍 ✅حالا بیا یه آزمایش ۳ ثانیهای با هم بکنیم! جای خالی رو با اولین کلمهای که به ذهنت میاد برای خودت پر کن: 🗝️😃 ✅️ «پول درآوردن سخته چون …» ✅️ «عشق واقعی وجود نداره چون …» ✅ «من نمیتونم تغییر کنم چون …» جوابی که فوراً اومد، دقیقاً همون «باور پنهان کالبد ذهنی» توئه!😉 ❌اگر حالت تو زندگی خوب نیست، مشکل خودت نیستی؛ ❌ مشکل این برنامههای ویروسی و قدیمی تو ذهنتن 🔍✨
❤56🤩3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 262 posts we hold for @arezujazb368. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@arezujazb368 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تجربه ات رو واسم علامت بزن لطفا🤭
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
تمرین پریشب رو که راس ساعت ۱۹ گذاشتم انجام دادید؟🌱 میخوام ادامه اش رو بگما😍⚘️
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
چند نفرتون فایل پی دی اف دیشب رو باز کردید؟ و نگاه کردید؟😍 (میخوام ببینم اگر تعداد زیاد هست ازاین نوع تمرین ها بیشتر بذارم که رشدتون سریع تر بشه🌱🫶)
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
حالا برات پیش اومده اکستنشن کنی یا موهات رو بفروشی و بعدش حسِ سنگینیِ عجیبی داشته باشی؟» 😃😍
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 262 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معجزه.زندگی | آرزوجوکار” (@arezujazb368), 44,408 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arezujazb368.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.