Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +286. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,692–7,106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 20:34
7,039
+1
2 Nov 2026, 23:06
7,038
-1
27 Oct 2026, 20:20
7,039
-1
25 Oct 2026, 02:36
7,040
-7
22 Oct 2026, 10:52
7,047
-2
19 Oct 2026, 06:05
7,049
-9
16 Oct 2026, 02:08
7,058
+5
12 Oct 2026, 23:49
7,053
+3
6 Oct 2026, 15:41
7,050
+4
29 Sept 2026, 07:20
7,046
+70
19 Sept 2026, 09:17
6,976
-8
15 Sept 2026, 06:19
6,984
+5
11 Sept 2026, 23:59
6,979
+43
7 Sept 2026, 19:41
6,936
-11
3 Sept 2026, 05:56
6,947
+2
30 Aug 2026, 23:17
6,945
+50
28 Aug 2026, 01:04
6,895
+83
24 Aug 2026, 16:48
6,812
+72
20 Aug 2026, 20:45
6,740
-2
17 Aug 2026, 18:13
6,742
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.99%
avg views ÷ 7,039 subscribers
Avg views / post
421
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
25 (11 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
6,322
Reactions total
266
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 10:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
925
Videos
195
Links
333
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
448 reactions across 24 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
239
53.3%
👍
71
15.8%
🔥
65
14.5%
😭
25
5.58%
🥰
12
2.68%
🎉
9
2.01%
💔
9
2.01%
💯
8
1.79%
🤝
4
0.893%
🙏
3
0.67%
❤🔥
1
0.223%
😍
1
0.223%
🥴
1
0.223%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 448 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
8.00%
2 of 25 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
100
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
544
over 23 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqwf9Yvi
1
6 November 2026
6 November 2026
2VtzqxdY7CP
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
‼️Внимание! Бесплатный 2-дневный интенсив «Система работы с детьми с РАС» для логопедов, дефектологов и других специалистов.
Регистрируйтесь по ссылке: https://clck.ru/3WFbus
👩🏻🏫 Ведущая — Наталья Гафиятулина, логопед с 17-летним опытом, автор программы обучения логопедов в РАНХиГС.
Вы узнаете:
🧩 Как начать работу — диагностика РАС и установление контакта
🧩 Как построить маршрут коррекции, чтобы результат был чер…
Зрительно-пространственная дисграфия
Виды дисграфий
Регуляторная дисграфия
Акустико-кинестетическая (фонологическая) диаграфия
1️⃣Начинаем со зрительной координации.
▪️Глазодвигательные упражнения. Помимо слежения за предметом перед собой добавить слежение за мячом. Мяч вверх - взгляд вверх, мяч вниз - взгляд вниз и тд.
▪️Разрезанная азбука. На столе или на полу перед ребенком отдельные буквы. Вы задаете слово, …
🌿 Центр развития образования
Полезная информация для организаций дополнительного образования и осуществляющих уход и присмотр за детьми.
🌿 Чистописание и каллиграфия
Все о красивых буквах
Здесь вы найдете полезные советы, бесплатные прописи и упражнения для исправления почерка для школьников и педагогов.
🌿 ЛОГОПЕД
Материалы для занятий, игры на развитие высших психических функций.
🌿 РАЗВИВАЮЩИЕ ИГРЫ и ИГРУШКИ ДЛЯ …
Добавим упражнений в этот канал. А завтра выложу пост про последний вид дисграфии.
Вы знаете, как я люблю инструмент ладошки.
На основании них можно придумать огромное количество вариаций заданий от простых до сложных.
Сегодня вариант сложный.
6 действий - 6 счетов. Соответственно, можно и стишок/чистоговорку на 6 счетов взять.
1️⃣ладонями по ладошкам хлоп
2️⃣раздвинуть ладошки
3️⃣хлоп в ладоши в воздухе
4️⃣хлоп…
Хочу рассказать про канал, который читаю и рекомендую.
Я часто вижу одну и ту же проблему у людей, которые решаются на психологическую помощь. Они не знают, куда идти. Специалистов много, подходов ещё больше, а как выбрать - непонятно. И в итоге человек либо откладывает, либо идёт к первому попавшемуся.
Недавно мне попался канал психологического центра Зерно. И сразу возникает мысль: вот бы такие места находить ран…
Усложнение на фитболе.
Про постуральный контроль я писала тут.
Про срединную линию здесь.
Часть упражнений люблю давать с фитболом. Такие задания особенно подходят детям с трудностями внимания.
Задача ребенка - удержать себя на фитболе помимо выполнения основного задания.
В школе частая проблема - ребенок может либо удержать себя за партой, либо стоя на голове, но выполнить задание. А два действия даются трудно.…
Можно ли распечатать шаблоны черно-белыми?
Да да да!
Шаблоны подойдут детям любого возраста.
Если ребенок читать не умеет, вы можете ему читать, заполнять за него.
Подумаю, как можно в виде картинок еще добавить. Но пока что можете печатать картинки, клеить их на шаблоны.
Картинки не делала, потому что это очень индивидуальный процесс, кому-то нужны картинки, где ребенок сидит за столом, кому-то где делает заряд…
Создали еще одну зону для ребенка 🥹
Ребенок уже занимает 2 комнаты, кухню, коридор.
Готовлюсь к зиме. Прогулки зимой меня пугают, сначала собраться, а потом с моим снеговиком изучать площадки. А если слякоть…
Ортоковрики восторг. Там есть маленькие еще квадраты. А их можно и трогать, и стоять на них одной ногой, и делать моторные дорожки с опорой на них.
📱Мое сообщество ВК
📱Мой канал в max
📱Мой пинтерест
Канал …
Шаблоны помощи детям с регуляторными трудностями доступны на сайте.
Оплатить и получить доступ.
400 рублей.
Сделала доступ и на Яндекс диске, и на облаке mail.
Шаблоны были созданы из моей практики. Часть из них я рисовала от руки на занятиях, а намного удобнее просто распечатать.
6 видов шаблонов по несколько вариантов.
Шаблоны и для семьи, и для специалистов.
▪️Чек-листы - позволяют организовать ребенка. Мож…
В борьбе за письмо иногда мы вынуждены придумывать разное.
Когда ребенку сложно в тетради, а тетрадь - это сложно (твердая ручка, тонкая линия, небольшой лист, орфография еще).
А если уже сформировано ожидание неудачи, злость и недовольство на эту деятельность, то важно не забыть и про эмоциональный компонент.
Помимо коррекционных мероприятий на уровне всего тела, то добавляем и работу на листе. Но лист ≠ тетрадь …
У меня вышел продуктивный рабочий день вчера.
▪️Дописала то самое 👆🏻 заключение и рекомендации (аж 11 страниц, потому что подобные для родителей, что делать и как). Кусочек про организацию пространства на фото.
▪️Сняла видео по анкете. Думала сегодня выложу в продажу, но придумала кое-что еще добавить. Поэтому скоро.
▪️Подготовила папки с шаблонами. Тоже скоро выложу.
▪️Оплатила подписку для сайта. Скоро все буде…
Не успело закончиться прошлое обучение у Елисея Осина, как я иду на новое.
В ноябре стартует курс «РАС И/ИЛИ СДВГ». 16 ноября - 23 декабря.
Для меня это тонкая и сложная тема, которая всегда вызывает споры в сообществе коллег. И хотелось бы погрузиться и разобраться. Я была в поиске практического взгляда на эту проблему.
Прошлый курс мне понравился именно способом объяснения, наличием примеров, большим количеством…
❤8🔥5🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @arhipenko_kids. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @arhipenko_kids as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мамы, испытываете ли вы чувство вины в воспитании ребенка? В заботе о нем?
Нет14%
Да, часто29%
Да, иногда50%
Да, редко7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Елена Лаштабега @elena_lashtabega · 22,869 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Нейропсихология🧠 | Дети | Психология| Развитие🙆 @neyropsychology · 29,323 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
Шамиль Ахмадуллин | УМНОШКОЛА @shamilahmadullin · 177,416 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
УмноШкола Шамиля Ахмадуллина @knshu23 · 66,805 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
НейроДом🏡 @NeiroDom · 20,785 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
Библиотека НужныхКниг @NeyroPDF · 19,088 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 October 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нейропсихолог Архипенко София🧠” (@arhipenko_kids), 7,039 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arhipenko_kids.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.