Channel
@arhivesslyn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002388335743 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arhivesslyn |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arhivesslyn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 5 | -1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:23 | 6 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 6 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 28 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (28 August 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 175 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Sept 2026, 06:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
ебаать наконец то новый завозик на этот канал. как вкусно ты оформил данную работу, слишком горячий и дохуя богатый пост получился. идеальный вайб чгчб или того самого парня с качалки. обожаю оформление твоих постов, самый любимый эстет канал. восхищен до предела
родной, сразу взгляд притягивает это оформление как будто смотришь на профиль человека , классно придумал. от чонгука веет чем то таким горячим , уличным , его нельзя назвать репером по вайбу или чем то подобным, похоже на что то более опасное. нравится , что здесь присутствует что то похожее на компьютерную графику, это манит, признаюсь. задний фон идеален, если не всматриваться то кажется словно там игральные карты…
Photo, posted without a caption
Данный пост привлекает своей энергетикой и нежной Дженни. Данная работа выглядит сексуально и одновременно нежно, это просто замечательный контраст, и с помощью него на этот пост можно залипнуть. Дженни там особенно нежна и привлекательна, но от неё чуть-чуть веет вайбом стервозности.
Патриарх, этот пост выглядит как кадр из ночного клуба. Чёрный, серый, серебристо-белый строгая гамма, но при этом пост переливается и блестит за счёт стразовых текстур. Создаётся ощущение, будто ты в центре ночного мегаполиса, где всё пропитано стилем, деньгами и дерзостью. Тут тебе и сияющие надписи «SHINE» и «Miss Bitch», и элементы плеера, и полупрозрачные вставки с цитатами, и крупные фразы вроде «BABY, BABY, BA…
родной, ахуенный пост как всегда, обожаю твой канал и твои работы, нравится то, что в ней более такой королевский вайб, но при этом в посте можно заметить похоть и это даже более интригует и завораживает, прекрасно сделал.
ну какая же прелесть. так хорошо ты подобрал текст к самим фоткам, прям эстетика такая, шик
Почему это играет уже второй час подряд? Ахенный монтаж. Не смотря на то что оба перса чг вы подобрали очень классные кадры и думаю они очень хорошо передали вайб каждого из вас, не создавая впечатления одного человека. Ручки золотые.
My dolbaebka.
Мои любимые нахуй. Какой сексуальный коллаб. Я б вам дал. Подходите пиздец.
🌟 Мои пацаны уже выхватили движ. Я надеюсь и ты не спишь малы-хы-хы-ш.🤩
два крутых челика создали пиздатый совместный пост. бля какой фон изумительный, оформленный под ваш стиль словно подчеркивает всю грозность и дерзость в ваших характерах. черно белый оттенок различной формы меня забавляет, особенно ужастики на фоне тоже разбавили этот моментик. пост отличный и на взгляд даже очень хороший.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @arhivesslyn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Архив.” (@arhivesslyn), 5 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arhivesslyn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.