Channel
@aristocraticgame
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,034subscribers
+68 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002207961663 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aristocraticgame |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aristocraticgame |
@aristocraticgame was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 1,034 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 1,035 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 1,034 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 1,031 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 1,028 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 1,029 | +63 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 966 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 966 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
117 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 23.9% | |
| 😱 | 20 | 17.1% | |
| 🍓 | 12 | 10.3% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 10.3% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 10.3% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 5.98% | |
| custom 5960876898417382176 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| custom 5465233480570907769 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.855% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨🎙️ СЕНСАЦИЯ ДНЯ Глафира Помазкова из Z&D Team сегодня просто разрывала поляну Обновила свой личный рекорд на 4!!! удара и выбилась в лидерскую пятерку текущего раунда (еще продолжается)
🥰12🔥8👏6🍓2
Уже второй раз за утро на все поле разлается воздушная тревога 🚨🚨
😱20🍓1
Video message, posted without a caption
🏆7🍓4custom 59608768984173821763
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
😍4custom 54652334805709077692custom 59608768984173821761
А мы уже болеем за наших студентов на первой девятке 🙈
❤6🍓1custom 59608768984173821761
Video message, posted without a caption
👍4🤝1
Ну как же так…..!!!!! 😨😯😵 Варвара Неклюдова все сделала идеально… считанные сантименты отделили ее от заслуженного берди P.S. походка как у Тони Старка, только взрывов за спиной не хватает
❤11🙏2🍓1😎1
🎇 В гольфе главное не счет, а feeling И вот чувство прекрасного и эстетика гольфа у Полины на нереальном уровне Да и к тому же две лунки и два уверенных пара, так что все отлично по всем статьям ❤️ — накидаем нагей медиа-гольфистке сердечек и она точно справится с КАТом
❤11🍓3custom 59608768984173821761
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @aristocraticgame. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИГРЫ АРИСТОКРАТОВ” (@aristocraticgame), 1,034 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aristocraticgame.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.