@mishll0 баннеры вроде как и легкие, но обалденные, колор шик и блеск, всё качественно, годно, супер

Channel
итоги от арки?
@arkaacocala
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003912739205 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arkaacocala |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 10 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arkaacocala |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 3 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 74.1%
- avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.2
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 40 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 59s
- Average length
- 30s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
@m0tthh ну тупо моя товар, сам по себе комфортный человек , оформление ахуенное . Разнообразный контент, понравился твой последний бот, продолжай а том же духе
@kiriesa ну это вообще секс женщина, не видели на видео? Многое теряете, классное оформление. Как человек тоже очень общительный, может поддержать
@kunjyti красотка дай номерок. Оформление прикольное в видео влюбилась, коллаб вышел очень красивый
@Kl3vsha о лп, как человек классный, может поддержать , сколько оформления не меняла все выходили удачно и красиво, материал самое то
@muna_evv_ai с соткой тебя. В канале свой вайб, ботов просмотрела очень даже хорошо, переписка ахиренная я не наелась жду ещё
@worrld00 миленькое оформление, от видео теку, баннеры очень красивые 🩶🩶
@Kiss_Mairis Молодцы девочки, оформление хоть стой хоть падай, материал хороший всем советую туда
@mefedrila_50 обожаю тебя и твоё оформление, это очень круто братан, материал хорошие, последние связки со стинтом взяла
@the_sheffchekk1 Глаза слепит, это шедевры, рисунки как будто Пикассо рисовал
@PTYT88 тоже любимка, оформление прикольное, как человек приятный, рада, что у тебя двести с таким материалом и триста будет не за горами
╭╭ִ╼࣪━━ ᮫ ︶⏝︶︶ МНЕНИЯ , от арки . ۫ 𝆬 ִׄ𝆹𝅥 𝅄 ִ кидайте в комы юз на ваш канал я его чекаю и пишу о нем мнение оно может быть как и хорошим так и не очень, без обид
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arkaacocala. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@astral443 · 921 postВыгорела
@kiriesa · 201 post୨ 𐌺унжуᴛ 🥮 ₊ °
@kunjyti · 151 postархив лолохч ака кверрти
@lolohchdoes · 751 post⌑ˊˊрест🌴 ..ܻ 𐌌ׅ๏֮ი݊ь˚⋆
@m0tthh · 981 post𖦹°‧💤𝑴𝒆𝒇𝒆𝒅𝒓𝒊𝒍𝒂.🪼°.🔒
@mefedrila_50 · 231 postРест/ʍыᴧа нᴇᴛ. сьᴇᴧи.|ෆilσn୧k
@Milonrok · 371 postпереход||ℳishll. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖
@mishll0 · 821 postрест||ⲙᥙᥒᥲᥱ᥎᥎
@muna_evv_ai · 1171 postпереезд//ртуть˚⋆
@PTYT88 · 1321 post֪ПЕРЕЕЗД!! ׅ ֹ =͟͞ ♡şcãrlětț
@scarletth3lpp · 751 postшеф// рест НЕ ТРОГАТЬ
@the_sheffchekk1 · 1541 post🦄🇮🇱 𝓌𝑜𝓇𝓇𝓁𝒹 מַלְאָך
@worrld00 · 2011 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“итоги от арки?” (@arkaacocala), 3 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arkaacocala.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.