Channel
@arpacpublic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,411subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001278897193 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arpacpublic |
| Created | 23 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arpacpublic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 1,411 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:25 | 1,407 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 1,405 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 1,400 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:39 | 1,396 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 1,394 | -24 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 1,418 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 1,411 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 1,414 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 1,405 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 1,405 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
494 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 279 | 56.5% | |
| ❤ | 161 | 32.6% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 10.7% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.202% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
« Dès que les balles ont commencé à pleuvoir sur lui, tout a basculé d’un seul coup. Toute son assurance s’est effondrée en un instant. » Le moyen le plus efficace pour faire s'effondrer l'assurance des criminels est de leur tirer dessus. Rétablissons le port d'armes civil.
❤25👍9🔥9
Bon podcast au sujet du port d'armes de la part de @Fumigenes721 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOHxENS212s&lc=UgwrlCCrlbw0K24JRn54AaABAg Je vous invite à l'écouter et à le partager avec les personnes qui s'intéressent à la question, c'est une bonne introduction aux enjeux et à la situation.
👍12
Un nouveau héros du port d'armes civil est apparu aux Etats-Unis. Que des citoyens américains se défendent et sauvent des vies grâce à leur arme à feu est courant, mais vous en entendez jamais parler en France parce que cette réalité ne va pas dans le sens voulu par ceux, encore trop nombreux, qui ne veulent pas que vous puissiez défendre votre vie. Jordan Salinas écrivait ceci il y a deux ans : « Entraînez-vous c…
❤34👍8
https://www.arpac.eu/2026/07/08/les-justifications-philosophiques-du-desarmement/ Les justifications philosophiques du désarmement Juil 8, 2026 Afin de justifier le désarmement de la population par l’interdiction du port d’armes, voire carrément de la détention d’armes, un argument, certes relativement peu utilisé, se fait quelquefois entendre : l’État aurait le monopole de la violence légitime. Notre désarmement…
👍18❤4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSrKOOKYeP4
👍13
https://www.breizh-info.com/2026/07/13/262156/aux-armes-citoyens-larpac-deconstruit-le-mythe-du-monopole-de-la-violence-legitime/
👍23❤7
C'est parti ce matin!
👍21❤6
Boulot du secrétariat en cours, gros envoi de goodies et cartes de membres prévu demain (une centaine) et un autre envoi prévu dans quelques semaines après avoir refait le plein de goodies.
👍28🔥2
https://youtu.be/u19FKd3ZMA0?is=AAO4J2oGoXUw7Poj
👍14
Photo, posted without a caption
❤64👍13🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥17👍7👎1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fs5Mm-TrsTQ Un citoyen arrête un terroriste armé d’un couteau à main nues! Il a risqué sa vie et heureusement s’en tire vivant. Militez pour le droit de vous défendre et le droit de porter des armes!
❤21👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @arpacpublic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ARPAC public (Association pour le Rétablissement du Port d'Arme Citoyen)” (@arpacpublic), 1,411 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arpacpublic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.