اگه این مدل پستا رو دوس دارین با ری اکتاتون حمایت کنید❤️🔥
❤🔥3

Channel
@arshad1402made28
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,276subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001622819917 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arshad1402made28 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arshad1402made28 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 2,276 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:33 | 2,274 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 2,277 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 2,278 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (5 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 265 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
74 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 61 | 82.4% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 16.2% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اگه این مدل پستا رو دوس دارین با ری اکتاتون حمایت کنید❤️🔥
❤🔥3
📘 Test، Measurement و Evaluation؛ سه واژه شبیه، سه مفهوم متفاوت! اگر این سهتا رو فقط ترجمه کنی، خیلی راحت توی تست قاطی میشن؛ پس با یه کد ساده یادشون بگیریم 👇 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🟦 1) TEST | تست A procedure designed to elicit a specific sample of behavior. یعنی یک فرایند مشخص داریم تا نمونهای از عملکرد فرد رو بیرون بکشیم و ببینیم چه کاری میتونه انجام بده. مثلاً: 📝 یک آزمون Vocabulary میگیریم تا بخشی از دانش واژگان فر…
❤🔥14
Photo, posted without a caption
🧠 چالش ۳۰ ثانیهای زبانشناسی 👀 کدوم رابطه معنایی در این مثال دیده میشه؟ The word "paper" can mean: 📄 a material 📝 an academic article A) Homonymy B) Homophony C) Polysemy D) Homography قبل از دیدن جواب، خودت انتخاب کن 😎 جوابت رو کامنت کن 👇 @made28admin
👍2
🧠 جوابها رو زدی؟ حالا ببین طراح سؤال چطور فکر کرده! 👀 توی تستهای زبانشناسی فقط حفظ کردن تعریفها کافی نیست؛ باید بتونی رابطه بین معنی، شکل نوشتاری و تلفظ رو سریع تشخیص بدی. در این تحلیل میبینیم چرا: 🔹 Homonymy → یک شکل، چند معنیِ بیربط 🔹 Homophony → تلفظ مشابه، نوشتار متفاوت 🔹 Homography → نوشتار مشابه، تلفظ متفاوت 🔹 Polysemy → یک واژه، چند معنی مرتبط ✨ اینفوگرافیک رو ذخیره کن؛ این ۴ مفهوم از اون مباحثیه که …
👍2
🗨 جوابای درست رو برام بنویس @made28admin
❤🔥5
🧠 این ۴ تا رو قاطی نکن! این اینفوگرافیک رو سیو کن تا تو تست سریع یادت بیاد 👀✨ 🎯 Homonymy | Homophony | Homography | Polysemy 🔥 جا افتاد؟ ریاکشن بده؛ 😎
❤🔥7
🔥 حالا بدون برگشتن به بالا: کلمهای داریم که یک شکل دارد اما چند معنیِ مرتبط. ذهن تو باید سریع بره سمت کدوم؟ 👀 1️⃣ Polysemy 2⃣ Homonymy 3⃣ Homophony 4⃣ Homography 🗨 جواب درست رو کامنت کن @made28admin
👍6
🧠 ۴ تا کلمه که خیلیا تو زبانشناسی باهم قاطی میکنن! Homonymy | Homophony | Homography | Polysemy بیا خیلی ساده جمعشون کنیم 👇 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔸 Homonymy یک شکل، چند معنیِ بیربط مثال: bank 🏦 بانک 🌊 کنار رودخانه ✅ شکل یکیه ❌ معنیها ربطی به هم ندارن One form → unrelated meanings ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔸 Homophony تلفظ یکیه، نوشتن فرق داره مثال: peace / piece 👂 تلفظ مشابه ✍️ املای متفاوت Same pronunciation → different spe…
❤🔥7👍1
🧠 زبانشناسی هنوز برات یه درس گنگه؟ بیا کاری کنیم کمکم تبدیل بشه به نقطهقوتت 😎 نه حفظی، نه سنگین؛ ساده، تستی و کاربردی. فردا از یه مبحث جذاب شروع میکنیم 👀 ❤️🔥 = بزن بریم زبانشناسی 👍 = دقیقاً همینو میخوام
❤🔥10
📊 گاهی یک نتیجه واقعی، بیشتر از ده تا جمله انگیزشی حرف داره... این هم یک نمونه واقعی از نتیجه آزمون استخدامی دبیری زبان انگلیسی 👇 وقتی آموزش، مرور و تستزنی هدفمند کنار هم قرار بگیرن، نتیجه کمکم خودش رو نشون میده. 🎯 مخصوصاً به عملکرد حیطه تخصصی دقت کنید؛ همون بخشی که این روزها داریم قدمبهقدم داخل کانال روی مباحثش کار میکنیم. قرار نیست فقط کارنامه ببینیم. هدف ما اینه بفهمیم برای رسیدن به چنین نتیجهای، چه مباح…
❤🔥7
🎯 اگر همه تیرها دقیقاً کنار هم بخورن، یعنی تیراندازیت عالیه؟ نه لزوماً! 👀 همین سؤال ساده، فرق دو مفهوم مهم آزمونسازی رو بهت یاد میده: Reliability vs. Validity ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏹 فرض کن ۵ تیر به سمت سیبل پرتاب کردی... هر ۵ تیر تقریباً به یک نقطه خوردهاند؛ اما آن نقطه اصلاً وسط سیبل نیست!😐 یعنی چی؟ ✅ تیرها به هم نزدیکاند ❌ ولی به هدف درست نخوردهاند پس: 🔁 Reliable = YES 🎯 Valid = NO چرا؟ چون نتیجهها ثابت و مشابه…
❤🔥5👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @arshad1402made28. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👀 امشب انتخاب با شماست... برای آموزش بعدی، دوست دارید بریم سراغ کدوم درس؟ 👇 رأی بدید؛ ببینیم امشب کلاس رو شما به کدوم سمت میبرید 😎
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎯 Which approach is BEST represented here?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ماده ۲۸ | استخدامی دبیری زبان” (@arshad1402made28), 2,276 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arshad1402made28.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.