Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ARSIP

Channel

ARSIP

@arsiporcind

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003933661202
TypeChannel
Username@arsiporcind
Created13 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded3 November 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/arsiporcind

Growth

83 Nov 2026, 19:22 — 8 subscribers4 Nov 2026, 05:18 — 8 subscribers3 Nov 2026, 19:224 Nov 2026, 05:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 05:188no change
3 Nov 2026, 19:228first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 13 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1414.6%
avg views ÷ 8 subscribers
Avg views / post
113
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held13 (13 October 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total1,358
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

21 Oct 2026, 09:12 UTC116 viewsread 3 November 2026
File

PDN :: #PICOCI01 Jika tidak bisa mengedit silahkan untuk mengirimkan format dibawah ini sertakan pict Muse dengan pakaian yang sopan permisi Miss/sir saya ( nama ) dari ( divisi ) ingin meminta tolong mengedit idc trainee , terima kasih sebelumnya Send ke @editororcindbot

15 Oct 2026, 12:44 UTC117 viewsread 3 November 2026

𓂃 ࣪ ֹ 🌷 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗧 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗘 🌷 ֹ ࣪ 𓂃 🌷 ── 𝗡𝗮𝗺𝗮 𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗸𝗮𝗽 :: 🌷 ── 𝗨𝘀𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲 :: 🌷 ── 𝗗𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶 :: 🌷 ── 𝗗𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶 𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗻 :: 🌷 ── 𝗔𝗹𝗮𝘀𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗮𝗯𝘂𝗻𝗴 :: 🌷 ── 𝗣𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗻 :: 🌷 ── 𝗕𝗲𝗸𝗲𝗿𝗷𝗮 𝗱𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮 𝘀𝗮𝗷𝗮 :: ── 𝗡𝗢𝗧𝗘 :: 𝗗𝗜𝗩𝗜𝗦𝗜 𝗖𝗔𝗗𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗔𝗡 𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗬𝗔 𝗗𝗜𝗔𝗠𝗕𝗜𝗟 𝗢𝗟𝗘𝗛 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗘 𝗬𝗔𝗡𝗚 𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗚𝗔𝗠𝗕𝗜𝗟 𝗗𝗜𝗩𝗜𝗦𝗜 𝗣𝗘𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚𝗜

15 Oct 2026, 12:43 UTC126 views0 reactionsread 3 November 2026

. 𓏲 ࣪ ֹ LᎥᥣᥡ Bᥣ᥆m VᎥsᎥt 𓂃 ࣪ ֹ . OᖇᑕIᑎᗪ ᗩᑎIᗰᗩᒪ ᑕᗩᖇᗴ ── s᥆ft pᥲᥕ, pᥙrᥱ ᥣ᥆vᥱ ── little bud that came to bloom with us today ⊹ pᥲtᎥᥱᥒt ᥒᥲmᥱ — : ⊹ ᥙsᥱrᥒᥲmᥱ — : ⊹ ᥴ᥆mpᥲᥒᎥ᥆ᥒ ᥒᥲmᥱ — : ⊹ tᎥmᥱ ᥆f bᥣ᥆᥆m — : ⊹ ᥴ᥆ᥒsᥙᥣtᥲsᎥ — : thank you for letting us hold your precious little lily today 🌷🐾 with love, blooming gently ever aft

15 Oct 2026, 12:23 UTC117 viewsread 3 November 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𓂃 ࣪ ֹ 🌷 RULES CUSTOMER OCI 🌷 ֹ ࣪ 𓂃 ── WAJIB SUBS CH @ORCINDANIMALCARE, AKAN KAMI CEK ── MENGISI FORMAT DENGAN BENAR, KIRIM 1X DAN TUNGGU BALASAN ── DILARANG UNSUBS SETELAH BERKUNJUNG KE ORCIND ANIMAL CARE ── MELAKUKAN PAYMENT 2 LPM UNTUK BERKUNJUNG KE ORCIND ANIMAL CARE, TIDAK PUNYA LPM? CEK @listlpm ── TIDAK MERUSUH DI RUANG KONSULTASI ── BUKAN ACC CLONE …

15 Oct 2026, 12:23 UTC109 viewsread 3 November 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𓂃 ࣪ ֹ 🌷 RULES UTAMA TRAINEE 🌷 ֹ ࣪ 𓂃 ── WAJIB SUBS CH @ORCINDANIMALCARE, AKAN KAMI CEK ── TIDAK ANTI KRITIK DAN BISA MENERIMA SARAN DARI FOI ── TIDAK HILANG HILANGAN SAAT DIBUTUHKAN ── WAJIB MENGGUNAKAN ACC UTAMA, BUKAN CLONE ATAU MATA-MATA ── GOOD ATTITUDE DIUTAMAKAN, TIDAK KACANG DAN BAPERAN ── PASTIKAN TIDAK DALAM MASA H/R/D ── ALL GENDER DIPERB…

15 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC110 viewsread 3 November 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𓂃 ࣪ ֹ 🌷 RULES PETINGGI 🌷 ֹ ࣪ 𓂃 ── WAJIB SUBS CH @ORCINDANIMALCARE , AKAN KAMI CEK ── TIDAK GILA JABATAN DAN SALING MENGHARGAI SESAMA STAFF ── GOOD ATTITUDE DIUTAMAKAN, TIDAK BAPERAN DAN ANTI KRITIK ── MENJAGA NAMA BAIK ORCIND ANIMAL CARE ── BUKAN ACC CLONE ATAU MATA-MATA ── DAPAT MENERIMA SARAN DARI FOI ── TIDAK HILANG SAAT BERTUGAS DAN DIBUTUHKAN ──…

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @arsiporcind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ARSIP” (@arsiporcind), 8 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arsiporcind.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.