Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Художник Берестова Катя

Channel

Художник Берестова Катя

@art_berestova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

381subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001770716913
TypeChannel
Username@art_berestova
Created1 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/art_berestova

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3793813807 August 2026 — 381 subscribers8 August 2026 — 381 subscribers14 August 2026 — 380 subscribers21 August 2026 — 379 subscribers28 August 2026 — 381 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 379–381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 14:12381+2
21 Aug 2026, 12:37379-1
14 Aug 2026, 15:46380-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:15381no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:30381first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4548.4%
❤‍🔥1920.4%
👀1415.1%
💋55.38%
44.30%
🕊44.30%
💔22.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC24 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @berestova_artPhoto

Самара ! Коллективная выставка «Волшебная гора» Название выставки отсылает к произведению Томаса Манна «Волшебная гора» — в философском романе немецкого писателя это место, где время теряет свою линейность, а границы между жизнью и болезнью размываются. Работы художников из Самары и Москвы вступают в диалог с этим пространством, исследуя ключевые дихотомии романа: холод, одиночество, болезнь и время. Художники: Данил

3👀1

1 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC121 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Интересность : В вк написала женщина, цитирую "Здравствуйте!Приобрели картину, стала интересна ее история.. Подскажите пожалуйста, вы автор?" В 2010 я заканчивала школу, но вцелом занималась живописью во всю. Картина не моя, но история интересная...вообще похоже на хороший сюрреалистический автопортрет -только я не читаю газет, могу использовать как подзорную трубу, а в сумке наверняка прятаны кости любимых зверюшек

👀63

30 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTC81 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Работы моей мамы. Иногда- редко рисует. Мне нравится - есть смелость, нравится что пишет из головы, нравится шоссе в никуда 🖤

❤‍🔥13👀41

27 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC113 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Александра внешне / Александра внутренне

84💋3

26 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC96 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В Царицыно 30х40 картон

9❤‍🔥6🕊4

25 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC167 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Отлично отпленэрили с Сашей, пикник, огромный дуб и сфинксы - процесс 💛

9💋2💔2👀1

20 Jul 2026, 18:41 UTC117 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто не был на ЭЛЕКТРОТОКЕ ? Вот есть видео запись обзор нашей с Дашей Йось выставка в галерее КОРНЕЙ 20.06.26 https://youtu.be/m3pQtfHXWzk?si=5lL9VMFoSqElIZGs

4👀2

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @art_berestova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Художник Берестова Катя” (@art_berestova), 381 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/art_berestova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.