Эти дракончики просятся в детскую комнату как интерьерные наклейки, было бы здорово их распечатать🩷
❤🔥10🥰4

Channel
@art_sketch_magic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
145subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001766866461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @art_sketch_magic |
| Description | Я дизайнер-иллюстратор. Здесь буду делиться своими работами: открытками, постерами, стикерами и иллюстрациями. А также иногда буду показывать закулисье процесса🤍 Сотрудничество: @art_sketch_anna |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/art_sketch_magic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 145 | no change |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:47 | 145 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 14 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
83 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 32.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 24.1% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 7.23% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 4.82% | |
| custom 5326032718629191243 | 3 | 3.61% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 3.61% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 3.61% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 2.41% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 2.41% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.20% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.20% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2025 to 20 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @art_sketch_magic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 November 2025 to 20 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Эти дракончики просятся в детскую комнату как интерьерные наклейки, было бы здорово их распечатать🩷
❤🔥10🥰4
Мерч для мам ⭐️❤️⭐️ Перед Новым годом я участвовала в конкурсе от Марии Романцовой «Маша в красном» — она запускала линейку мерча для мам и искала дизайнера. Проект сразу зацепил задачей: сделать не просто милые иллюстрации, а поддержку, которая работает на уровне смысла. В конкурсе я не победила, но попала в фавориты — и теперь могу показать процесс и решения. Задача: стикеры + принт для футболки. Ограничения: не…
🔥6❤5🤩3
🫶 Подарок, который запомнится На фото — новогодняя мандрагора, роспись по дереву. Но дело не в дереве, не в росписи и даже не в Новом годе. Большинство подарков — это безопасный выбор. Их дарят, чтобы не ошибиться. Но такие подарки быстро забываются. А вещи, созданные вручную и специально для адресата, работают по‑другому. Они не универсальны — и именно поэтому ценны. Такой подарок нельзя передарить «кому угодно»:…
❤5☃2🎄2
Участвовала в конкурсе и победила🥳 Первый раз рисовала стикерпак да и ещё и для блоггера Насти Джексон. Рассказываю как рисовала (это было не так просто как оказалось). Начала с идеи. Поняла, что не знаю, какие именно передать эмоции и написать словечки. Набросала небольшой список и начала делать быстрые скетчи на бумаге. Самым сложным оказалось поймать именно ту эмоцию, которую хочется передать. Иногда один накло…
❤7🔥5😍3❤🔥1
Мастерская✨иллюстратора pinned «Где вы чаще всего публикуете свои работы?»
Где вы чаще всего публикуете свои работы?
The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А у меня тут на пинтересте матрёшка залетела🔥 Сидишь себе спокойно, рисуешь… А где-то в заброшенном аккаунте Pinterest твоя матрёшка живёт собственной жизнью и неожиданно набирает популярность)) Я нарисовала её ещё весной для конкурса сувенирной продукции, выложила — и благополучно забыла. Вывод один: никогда не знаешь, что и где выстрелит. Видимо, нужно вести все соцсети сразу…😅 или не нужно? В следующем посте ус…
❤🔥3👍3custom 53260327186291912432
Вот это тот случай, когда нейросеть очень мило стилизовала мою иллюстрацию😍 Вязаный стиль такой уютный, можно быстро сделать много красоты ко дню матери или новому году... ⬇️в комментах оставлю обе открытки ко дню матери в хорошем качестве❤️и промт
❤7❤🔥2
А вот и мой получившийся котик 🤩 Я подумала, что лучше добавить динамики, чтобы высадка из летающей тарелки была интереснее. Ну и окружение не стала делать пёстрое, всё-таки акцент должен быть на котике. Итог эксперимента: пока мне проще нарисовать свою идею с нуля, чем объяснять её нейронке и тратить на это время) А у вас как дела с ии-шкой, часто пользуетесь при создании иллюстраций?
❤🔥4👍3custom 53260327186291912431
Художник VS Нейронка Увидела челлендж от Skillbox с котиками и не смогла пройти мимо ❤️🩹Первое задание — котик в космосе. Думаю, интересно, что на эту тему мне нарисует нейронка. Задала промт и вот, что вышло: 🟣на первой картинке ии-шка нарисовала много лишнего (ёлки и осенние листья), плюс она нарисовала обычные деревья, а мне нужны были необычные и с листьями в виде лапок. Клубки шерсти она разбросала не только п…
❤3⚡1✍1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @art_sketch_magic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Где вы чаще всего публикуете свои работы?
The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2025 to 20 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мастерская✨иллюстратора” (@art_sketch_magic), 145 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/art_sketch_magic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.