Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 35 days, net -143. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,172–7,357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 00:58
7,193
-18
7 Sept 2026, 20:17
7,211
-18
2 Sept 2026, 14:33
7,229
-16
30 Aug 2026, 13:44
7,245
-10
27 Aug 2026, 18:19
7,255
-25
24 Aug 2026, 15:29
7,280
-9
20 Aug 2026, 20:23
7,289
-8
18 Aug 2026, 00:18
7,297
-5
14 Aug 2026, 20:08
7,302
-26
11 Aug 2026, 09:23
7,328
-6
8 Aug 2026, 07:00
7,334
-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:01
7,336
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:59
7,336
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24m 50s
Average length
4m 58s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
408 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
215
52.7%
👍
98
24.0%
❤
66
16.2%
👏
14
3.43%
🤩
12
2.94%
❤🔥
2
0.49%
🎉
1
0.245%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 408 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artanovtech. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 April 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Привет, друзья!
🚀 У меня вышло первое видео на YouTube: собираем первый вайбкодинг-проект с нуля
Реальный веб-сервис — для примера делаем поиск виральных рилсов.
Разбираем по шагам:
- Оптала зарубежных сервисов
- аренда VPS и подключение по SSH
- GitHub и работа с Claude Code
- плагин Grill от Matt Pocock
- базы данных и сама разработка
- Docker, GitHub Actions, Nginx
- автодеплой — пушнул в репозиторий, изменени…
Привет, друзья! 👋
Хочу поделиться радостью: на моём портале megaparser появились первые платные подписчики. Ещё недавно я и подумать не мог, что можно сделать веб-сервис - да ещё и с платными подписчиками. Спасибо каждому, кто оформил подписку.
С момента первого релиза сервис сильно вырос. Начиналось всё с простого конструктора Telegram-ботов, а сейчас это целый набор инструментов:
🤖 Конструктор ботов - визуальный…
🎙 Друзья, вышло обновление - Molvi 1.5
По вашим просьбам доработал приложение - спасибо всем, кто писал и подсказывал. Собрал самое частое из фидбека, рассказываю, что нового.
Раньше, пока Molvi распознаёт речь, приходилось ждать и не переключать окна - иначе текст уходил не туда. Теперь диктуешь и спокойно занимаешься своим: переключаешь окна, листаешь браузер, отвечаешь в чате. Molvi сам запоминает, где ты начал…
🎙 Molvi - голосовой ввод, который работает у тебя, а не в облаке
Зажал клавишу → сказал → отпустил → текст уже напечатан в активном окне. В любом приложении: мессенджер, браузер, IDE, терминал.
Почему это круче подписочных аналогов (Wispr Flow, Aqua Voice):
✅ Бесплатно навсегда. Никаких $12–15 в месяц - код открыт, лицензия MIT
🔒 100% локально. Распознаёт Whisper прямо на твоём железе, аудио не покидает компьютер.…
artanov.ai pinned «Всем привет! 👋
Друзья, а вы работаете с Claude Code или Codex голосом? Надиктовывать промпты часто быстрее, чем печатать - особенно длинные ТЗ. Если да - каким приложением пользуетесь? Платите вы за него или нет ? Голосуем 👇»
Всем привет! 👋
Друзья, а вы работаете с Claude Code или Codex голосом? Надиктовывать промпты часто быстрее, чем печатать - особенно длинные ТЗ. Если да - каким приложением пользуетесь? Платите вы за него или нет ? Голосуем 👇
Wispr Flow42%
Aqua Voice3%
Да, другое приложение28%
Пользовался на бесплатном периоде24%
Оплачиваю ежемесячно12%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
artanov.ai pinned «😊😊😊😊 Привет! Здесь собрано всё самое полезное. Сохраняй и пользуйся 👇 🤖 Автоматизация и n8n ▪️ Автоматизация новостного канала с AI ▪️ Автоматический Reddit-дайджест на n8n ▪️ Дайджест из Reddit в Telegram ▪️ Как работать с API для контент-завода в n8n …»
😊😊😊😊
Привет! Здесь собрано всё самое полезное. Сохраняй и пользуйся 👇
🤖 Автоматизация и n8n
▪️ Автоматизация новостного канала с AI
▪️ Автоматический Reddit-дайджест на n8n
▪️ Дайджест из Reddit в Telegram
▪️ Как работать с API для контент-завода в n8n
📡 Парсинг Telegram
▪️ Парсинг постов с публичного канала
▪️ Телеграм-парсер: собирает посты из любых каналов
🧠 AI-агенты и Claude Code
▪️ AI-ассистент для ведения …
🔥 Fable 5 вернулась!
⚡️ До 7 июля модель доступна на всех платных планах - можно тратить на неё до 50% недельного лимита
Как собираетесь проверять Fable 5? Какой проект запилите на ней первым делом?
Пишите в комменты 👇
🔍 Anthropic обновил политику конфиденциальности (вступает в силу 8 июля 2026)
Многие напугались формулировкой про верификацию документов. Разобрал, что там на самом деле 👇
Паспорт требуют не со всех. В политике это раздел Verification Data, и проверка включается только «в определённых обстоятельствах» - в основном это подтверждение возраста (сервис не для тех, кому до 18) или подозрение на фрод/нарушение правил. Ни…
Всем привет!
Только вышел из двухнедельного отпуска. Сознательно ушёл от всего ИИ-шума, чтобы перезагрузиться. Возвращаюсь - а моим порталом megaparser.ru уже воспользовались 143 активных пользователя 🚀
Инструмент реально работает и приносит ценность.
Напоминаю, что вы можете прямо сейчас и бесплатно:
🤖 Создать своего Телеграм-бота
📨 Запустить воронку через рассылку - без оплаты подписок на сторонние сервисы
Что …
🔥8👍4❤1🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @artanovtech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Всем привет! 👋
Друзья, а вы работаете с Claude Code или Codex голосом? Надиктовывать промпты часто быстрее, чем печатать - особенно длинные ТЗ. Если да - каким приложением пользуетесь? Платите вы за него или нет ? Голосуем 👇
Wispr Flow42%
Aqua Voice3%
Да, другое приложение28%
Пользовался на бесплатном периоде24%
Оплачиваю ежемесячно12%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“artanov.ai” (@artanovtech), 7,193 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artanovtech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.