Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [18+] 𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀 | Poldy Vamp

Channel

[18+] 𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀 | Poldy Vamp

@artistsays

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

183subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002458160613
TypeChannel
Username@artistsays
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/artistsays

Growth

180183181.58 August 2026 — 183 subscribers8 August 2026 — 183 subscribers16 August 2026 — 180 subscribers23 August 2026 — 182 subscribers9 September 2026 — 183 subscribers8 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 180–183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 04:55183+1
23 Aug 2026, 05:22182+2
16 Aug 2026, 01:57180-3
8 Aug 2026, 12:46183no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:52183first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1s
Average length
1s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

114 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53955482503736504833429.8%
🥰2622.8%
custom 53956556632107561981311.4%
119.65%
💋108.77%
🍓97.89%
💊32.63%
🎉21.75%
💅21.75%
💘21.75%
🦄21.75%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC2 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @slashhh_PodslushkaPhoto

🤩😀😀😀😀😀🤩 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤩 🔡🔡 🅱️🔡⭕⭕ — ВЫ ВИДЕЛИ ЧТО ТВОРИТ АКТЕР КРЮГЕРА? — а мне нравится как саппорт Майерса из *этой сетки* ведет блог. — ПОЧЕМУ ЭТОГО ХУДОЖНИКА ПО ГОУСТФЕЙСАМ ЕЩЁ НЕ ОТМЕНИЛИ!?!? Это же подслушка по ФАНДОМУ СЛЕШЕРОВ, ХОРРОРОВ И ТРИЛЛЕРОВ. (Игры/фильмы/сериалы и т.д.) 😀😀😀😀 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ➖ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤❗️ ты же можешь высказать наконец-то здесь свое мнение о чем и о ком угодно. 🤩 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🤩🩸🩸 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 К сл🤩у наша н

6 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC36 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @buysell_repeatPhoto

продаю сигны с новорожденными котятами! 🤩общее фото с мамой кошкой — 20р 🤩фото с отдельным котенком отдельно от мамы-кошки (есть белая с цветным хвостиком, тигровый, два черно-белых и одна в пятнышку) — 50р 🤩фото с 2+ котятами отдельно от мамы-кошки — 60р 🤩возможно обсуждение вариантов и цен, но ни в коем случае ничего что может навредить 🤩 котята не страдают, сильные, здоровые, мама кошка спокойная, все в порядке.

3 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC177 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Tgc: @artistsays Неожиданный роблокс #art #sketch

🥰8custom 53956556632107561985🍓4custom 53955482503736504832💅1💋1

31 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC142 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не могу не похвастаться

3custom 53955482503736504832

28 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC159 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Можно приступать анимировать порно

custom 539554825037365048352🎉2💋1

28 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC266 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Tgc: @artistsays Моя первая ± адекватная покадровая анимация которой я доволен☝️ #art

🥰14custom 53955482503736504837custom 539565566321075619851💊1💋1🦄1

25 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC310 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Tgc: @artistsays Вот так вот (Задание: нарисовать персонажа на фотке вписав его в окружение) #art

custom 539554825037365048311🍓5💋5💘2🥰2custom 53956556632107561982💅1💊1

25 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC170 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Достойный платный контент я считаю Скоро кстати арт будет ибо я вступил в артхаус (там нужно на каждое задание делать полноценки)

custom 53955482503736504835💋2🥰2💊1custom 53956556632107561981

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @artistsays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[18+] 𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀 | Poldy Vamp” (@artistsays), 183 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artistsays.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.