Photo, posted without a caption
❤27👍11🙏2
Signed Артем

Channel
@artkirpich
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
7subscribers
-1,732 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001227604263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artkirpich |
| Created | 17 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artkirpich |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 7 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 4 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 3 | -1,782 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 1,785 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 1,784 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 1,777 | +34 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 1,743 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 1,739 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:50 | 1,739 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
464 reactions across 10 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 173 | 37.3% | |
| ❤ | 121 | 26.1% | |
| 😁 | 51 | 11.0% | |
| 💯 | 37 | 7.97% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 4.96% | |
| 🤣 | 15 | 3.23% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 3.02% | |
| 🎉 | 10 | 2.16% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 0.647% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 0.647% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.431% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.431% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.431% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.431% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.431% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.431% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.216% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.216% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 464 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤27👍11🙏2
Signed Артем
Photo, posted without a caption
👍25🤣9❤2🔥1🤡1🤯1
Signed Артем
Ну а теперь друзья, мои переходим к моей любимой теме - "Биографии американских миллиардеров". Предположим вы наследник огромного состояния и у вас возникло желание причинять справедливость. Что вы делаете? Одеваете маску летучего грызуна и начинаете по ночам мордовать бомжей с воплями "Я ужас летящий на крыльях ночи!!!"? А не фига. Знакомьтесь, Джеймс Кокс «Ферги» Чемберс-младший, ̶Ш̶е̶с̶т̶о̶й̶ ̶г̶е̶р̶ц̶о̶г̶ ̶н̶ь…
❤25👍11🤣6🔥4👏2😁2
Signed Артем
Продолжаю отрабатывать кровавые турецкие лиры. Вот что еще хотел дополнить к тексты. Что израильтяне "добились" в последнее время, это что стали отгребать в самых неожиданных местах. От Черногории до Монголии. И стали ловить лучи добра и любви от людей, которые раньше относились к ним более чем лояльно. Кто слышал об антиизраильских настроениях на Кавказе или в Центральной Азии? А сейчас "местечковым" пришлось придум…
👍13❤12🎉10🤷♂3🏆2👎2🍾1
Signed Артем
Photo, posted without a caption
👍21😁13❤7👏1
Signed Артем
Пришло в голову, что по сравнению со средневековыми крестьянами, наши современники несколько, ну так скажем туповаты... Помню в советских учебниках смеялись над мужиками верившими в "доброго царя". Учитывая, что кроме монархизма других форм правления тогда не был это не удивительно. Причем надо сказать, что в "доброго царя" не слишком и верили. Например окружение Пугачева отлично знало кто он и "на трон" загнало ег…
👍55💯34❤11🔥4😁4🤔2🤡2
Signed Артем
На фото: Американская карикатура 40-хх годов, все зло - нацизм и коммунизм произрастают из материализма
😁28🔥9🤬2💯1
Signed Артем
К празднованию Дня взятия Бастилии: Помню лет 15 назад я написал стебный текст по поводу того, что ВФР это был проплаченный англичанами майдан, оборвавший взлет Франции Людовика XVI. Сегодня я увидел как про эти пишут в комментариях на полном серьезе. Любопытно, что если бы не бывшие коммунисты и марксисты вроде Оруэлла и Джиласа, праваки вероятно бы до сих пор оперировали бы понятиями роялистов 19 века, описывающи…
❤28👏9😁4✍2💯2🔥1
Signed Артем
Photo, posted without a caption
👍23❤5🔥2👏1
Signed Артем
Photo, posted without a caption
👍14❤4🔥2👏1
Signed Артем
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @artkirpich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Artyom Kirpitschenok |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian Israeli historian |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“artkirpich” (@artkirpich), 7 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artkirpich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.