Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 910–926 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 11:19
912
-1
4 Sept 2026, 14:42
913
-4
28 Aug 2026, 08:55
917
-5
20 Aug 2026, 22:45
922
-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:00
924
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:22
924
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6
66.7%
🔥
3
33.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Так говорят наши гости… 🤍
Самая большая ценность для нас — ваши эмоции после визита в ARTMASTER🩷
Мы с особым трепетом читаем каждый отзыв, потому что за каждым из них — доверие, которое вы оказываете нашей команде!
Спасибо, что выбираете нас, делитесь впечатлениями и находите время сказать тёплые слова. Именно они вдохновляют нас становиться ещё лучше каждый день!
Спасибо, что вы с нами♥️
Это очень ценно✨
5 привычек, которые помогают сохранить руки ухоженными 🤍
Красивые руки — это не только свежий маникюр. Во многом их внешний вид зависит от ежедневного ухода.
✨ 1. Используйте крем после каждого мытья рук.
Это помогает сохранить кожу мягкой и защищает её от сухости.
✨ 2. Не забывайте про масло для кутикулы.
Всего минута в день — и кутикула выглядит аккуратнее, а маникюр дольше сохраняет свежий вид.
✨ 3. Надевайте …
Почему стоит выбрать пилочный маникюр?
Пилочный маникюр — это современная техника обработки кутикулы без режущих инструментов, с использованием специальных одноразовых пилочек.
Почему гости выбирают именно эту технику?
• Бережная обработка кожи вокруг ногтя без агрессивного воздействия.
• Аккуратный внешний вид кутикулы по мере её отрастания.
• Комфорт во время процедуры благодаря мягкой технике работы.
• Подходит…
Каждая деталь в ARTMASTER продумана с заботой🤍
Не только для наших гостей, но и для команды!
Мы убеждены: настоящий сервис начинается с отношения к людям, которые создают эту атмосферу каждый день.
Именно поэтому в ARTMASTER есть пространство, где мастера могут восстановить силы, немного замедлиться и вернуться к работе с удовольствием🤍
🤍 Доброе утро, дорогие гости!
Пусть это воскресенье станет маленькой паузой перед новой неделей.
Подарите себе время, которое действительно приносит удовольствие: любимые процедуры, приятную атмосферу и час, посвящённый только себе.
Будем рады видеть вас сегодня в ARTMASTER✨
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
IBX SYSTEM или японский маникюр — что выбрать?
Обе процедуры помогают восстановить натуральные ногти, но делают это по-разному.
IBX SYSTEM — укрепление изнутри.
Система проникает глубоко в ногтевую пластину, помогает уменьшить ломкость и расслоение, делая ногти крепче. Главное преимущество — IBX можно выполнять как самостоятельно, так и под покрытие, продолжая носить любимый гель-лак.
Японский маникюр — уход и ест…
«У меня же ничего не болит. Значит, подолог мне не нужен?»
Это одно из самых распространённых заблуждений.
К подологу обращаются не только тогда, когда появилась сильная боль или серьёзная проблема. Наоборот — лучше прийти раньше🤍
Например, если вы заметили:
• ноготь начал менять форму;
• стало некомфортно в привычной обуви;
• появились натоптыши или трещины;
• кожа стоп стала очень сухой;
• педикюр перестал прин…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @artmaster_ufa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вакансии в Уфе @rabota_ufaq · 50,646 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МАНИКЮР | ПЕДИКЮР | ПОДОЛОГ УФА” (@artmaster_ufa), 912 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artmaster_ufa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.