National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 30% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 92 days, net -667. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,162–12,029 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 09:49
11,262
-11
6 Nov 2026, 10:36
11,273
-5
5 Nov 2026, 11:17
11,278
-7
4 Nov 2026, 11:15
11,285
-9
3 Nov 2026, 10:10
11,294
-17
2 Nov 2026, 10:56
11,311
-4
1 Nov 2026, 11:46
11,315
-7
31 Oct 2026, 14:05
11,322
-6
30 Oct 2026, 12:35
11,328
-6
29 Oct 2026, 13:56
11,334
-7
28 Oct 2026, 14:40
11,341
-7
27 Oct 2026, 17:59
11,348
-9
26 Oct 2026, 20:45
11,357
-12
25 Oct 2026, 17:10
11,369
-5
24 Oct 2026, 17:48
11,374
-11
23 Oct 2026, 18:19
11,385
-6
22 Oct 2026, 16:36
11,391
-7
21 Oct 2026, 12:00
11,398
-3
20 Oct 2026, 06:36
11,401
-5
19 Oct 2026, 03:05
11,406
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 11,262 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
49 (19 June 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
26,696
Reactions total
615
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 08:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,083 reactions across 43 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
390
36.0%
💔
266
24.6%
👍
195
18.0%
😭
46
4.25%
🕊
32
2.95%
🤯
30
2.77%
💯
27
2.49%
😁
18
1.66%
😱
17
1.57%
😢
12
1.11%
🌚
10
0.923%
🙏
9
0.831%
💋
7
0.646%
👌
5
0.462%
🔥
4
0.369%
🗿
4
0.369%
🤣
4
0.369%
🍌
2
0.185%
😍
2
0.185%
🥰
2
0.185%
1 further kind
1
0.092%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,083 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 49 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
35
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artologism. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (31.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
وقتی یه شماره تلفن تبدیل میشه به اثر هنری!
1️⃣ لورین هیل و وایکلف ژان از گروه Fugees، به مناسبت سیسالگی آلبوم معروف The Score، یه پروژهی جالب راه انداختن به اسم FUGEES HOPELINE.
2️⃣ ایدهش خیلی سادهست:
با یه شماره تلفن تماس میگیری، پیامهای لورین هیل و وایکلف ژان و بخشی از موسیقی جدید Fugees رو میشنوی و بعد خودت هم میتونی صدات رو ضبط کنی و دربارهی «امید»، زندگی و وضعیت امروز دنیا حرف بزنی.
3️⃣ یعنی اینجا دی…
بنیاد پل هاملین فهرست برندههای جایزه ۷۵ هزار پوندی خودش رو اعلام کرد. هنرمندانی چون لیندا بل، راچل کراوثر، روری پیلگریم، جورجینا استار و هِیلی تامکینز برندههای این جایزه بودند. این جوایز بدون هیچگونه تعهد یا محدودیتی به هنرمندان اهدا میشه تا از فعالیتهای مستقل اونا حمایت کنه. این جایزه از اهمیت بالایی در حمایت از خلاقیت و پویایی هنر معاصر برخورداره.
@Artologism
گاردین یه گزارشی نوشته که حضور حتی یک ساعت در ماه توی گالریهای هنری، میتونه سلامت روان و جشم فرد رو بهبود ببخشه و رضایت از زندگی رو بیشتر کنه.
پینوشت: حالا تصور کن هنر وارد زندگی روزمرهی آدما بشه :) اون موقع چه شود!
@Artologism
رویکرد گالری Pace رو همیشه توی کیوریت کردن و نمایش آثار هنری دوست داشتم. جزو بهترینهای دنیاست. چند روز پیش گزارشی منتشرشده که امسال این گالری زیانده بوده! نمیدونم خوشحال باشم یا ناراحت.
@Artologism
🔴 نخستین حراج آثار هنرهای تجسمی کریستی در ابوظبی مجموعاً ۸.۹۴ میلیون دلار فروش داشت که اثر ۸۴۴ هزار دلاری منیر شاهرودی فرمانفرمائیان در صدر فروش قرار گرفت.
🥝 @ArtApplyDaily
📆 توی هفتهای که گذشت:
▪️به دستور نهادهای قضایی، مدرسه اینورس تعطیل شد.
▪️ پاتریک استوارت، بازیگر مطرح بریتانیایی درگذشت.
▪️مستند روباه و ماه صورتی، نامزد بهترین مستند جوایز گاتهام ۲۰۲۶ شد.
▪️ آرتین غضنفری به ۲۶ سال زندان محکوم شد.
▪️مهدی ماحوزی، استاد ادبیات فارسی درگذشت.
▪️جعفر پناهی به پنج سال زندان و مصادرهی اموالش محکوم شد.
▪️ الناز شاکردوست شایعهی مهاجرتش رو تکذیب کرد و گفت نمیخواد برگرده و بره زندان.…
🟣نوزدهم نوامبر قراره بازی جیتیای ۶ (GTA 6) منتشر بشه و پیشبینی شده اون روز خیلیها توی امریکا سر کار نرن و این مورد ممکنه حدود یک میلیارد دلار به اقتصاد کشور ضرر بزنه!
🟡دنیای بازی شگفت انگیزه. با اینکه هیچ وقت علاقمند به بازی نبودم اما قدرتش بینظیره.
پینوشت: اگر الان دارید حرفه یا رشتهای رو برای آیندهی خودتون انتخاب میکنید و به بازی هم علاقه دارید، صنعت گیم میتونه براتون فوقالعاده باشه.
@Artologism
دادستانی تهران با ادعای عدم رعایت موازین قانونی و شرعی، اقداماتی رو انجام داده! عجبا... هنر رو ول کردن و حواشی رو چسبیدن!
فرارو نوشته:
با ورود دادستانی تهران، علاوه بر اعلام جرم علیه عوامل و دستاندرکاران، سایت بلیط فروشی و حساب کاربری برگزارکننده رویداد در فضای مجازی مسدود شد. این گزارش همچنین حاکی است؛ متهمان برای اخذ توضیحات به دادسرا احضار شدهاند.
@Artologism
قطعا نظر دادن در مورد قد و ظاهر افراد کار شایستهای نیست. با این وجود وقتی برای اولین بار فهمیدم که قد پیکاسو ۱۶۳ سانتیمتر بوده، تعجب کردم. احساس میکنم یهویی همه دستاوردهاش رو به قدش ربط دادم و از «این همه آرتیست بودنش» تعجب کردم! هر چند خوبه که از اون روزها عبور کردم!
@Artologism
😱17👍13💋7
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @artologism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Art Apply | آرت اپلای @ArtApply · 23,040 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 September 2026
ProxyLegram @ProxyLegram · 24,417 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 September 2026
کارماسوزی اجدادی @mojezekodakdarun11 · 63,470 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Artologism | آرتولوژیسم” (@artologism), 11,262 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artologism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.