Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Artsen Collectief

Channel

Artsen Collectief

@artsencollectief

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,000subscribers

-331 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001564295771
TypeChannel
Username@artsencollectief
Created28 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/artsencollectief

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,00020,33120,165.56 August 2026 — 20,331 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,331 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,320 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,312 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,300 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,292 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,283 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,272 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,261 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,247 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,242 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,238 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,234 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,223 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,213 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,206 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,201 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,195 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,190 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,183 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,179 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,174 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,162 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,155 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,144 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,132 subscribers5 September 2026 — 20,115 subscribers8 September 2026 — 20,092 subscribers11 September 2026 — 20,077 subscribers13 September 2026 — 20,061 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,047 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20,024 subscribers19 September 2026 — 20,000 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -331. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,950–20,381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:0120,000-24
16 Sept 2026, 21:4220,024-23
14 Sept 2026, 21:5820,047-14
13 Sept 2026, 07:4020,061-16
11 Sept 2026, 11:4020,077-15
8 Sept 2026, 15:1920,092-23
5 Sept 2026, 09:5820,115-17
3 Sept 2026, 12:4020,132-12
2 Sept 2026, 04:0720,144-11
1 Sept 2026, 05:5420,155-7
31 Aug 2026, 04:0620,162-12
30 Aug 2026, 02:4920,174-5
29 Aug 2026, 04:2620,179-4
28 Aug 2026, 05:3320,183-7
27 Aug 2026, 04:4720,190-5
26 Aug 2026, 02:4320,195-6
25 Aug 2026, 05:2420,201-5
24 Aug 2026, 06:3820,206-7
22 Aug 2026, 16:3720,213-10
21 Aug 2026, 10:3520,223first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 20,000 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,800
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held24 (19 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total9,590
Reactions total193
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 27s
Average length
1m 49s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,462 reactions across 24 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,61965.8%
👍50420.5%
🔥1556.30%
👏1315.32%
🤔341.38%
😢90.366%
🙏50.203%
😱20.081%
🥰20.081%
🤯10.041%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,462 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 08:52 UTC≈3,420 views66 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Start nieuwe PrikWijs 70+ campagne Met PrikWijs helpen we je bewust na te denken: is deze prik voor jou noodzakelijk, effectief, veilig en nuttig? We bundelen inzichten van wetenschappers, artsen en onafhankelijke experts, zodat jij een weloverwogen keuze kunt maken – zonder druk. 👉 Lees meer over onze campagne: artsencollectief.nl/nogeenprik ⭐️ Doe mee en maak onze campagne groots! Help mee om PrikWijs zichtbaar t…

👏33❤24👍9

28 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈6,170 views127 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Ziekenhuisdirecteur klapt uit de school: “Nederland chanteerde ons met coronasteun” In deze aflevering van De Nieuwe Wereld gaat Jona Walk in gesprek met Jacco Vroegop, directeur van het ziekenhuis op Aruba en een van de zeldzame critici van het coronabeleid op bestuurlijk niveau. Samen blikken zij terug op de coronaperiode in het Caribisch deel van het Koninkrijk. Hoe ging Aruba om met de eerste golven, de economi…

❤99👏19🔥7👍1🙏1

20 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈7,060 views51 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Laatste kans! Bergen op Zoom – 27 september Voorlopig de laatste voorstelling van De Stilte Schreeuwt. Heb jij hem al gezien? Op 27 september organiseren we een nieuwe bijeenkomst in Bergen op Zoom. Een middag vol herkenning, verdieping en verbinding voor iedereen die te maken heeft met langdurige klachten na vaccinatie of infectie. De Stilte Schreeuwt blijft mensen raken. Door het hele land luisteren bezoekers naar…

❤37👍14

14 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC≈12,700 views126 reactionsread 3 September 2026

“We hebben er gratis nieuwe ziektebeelden bijgekregen” Frank van de Goot, klinisch en forensisch patholoog, is duidelijk naar journalist en presentator Pieter van der Wielen van de NRC-interviewserie ‘Het uur’. In het onderdeel Veranderen doodsoorzaken door de tijd heen? noemt Van de Goot auto-immuungerelateerde afwijkingen als het gevolg van coronavaccinaties. Hij is voorzichtig het een toename te noemen, “we kijken…

❤88👍31🔥7

5 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈9,270 views64 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Anthony Fauci: een genuanceerd oordeel Anthony Fauci, voormalig directeur van het NIAID en adviseur van zowel president Trump als president Biden tijdens de coronapandemie, is opnieuw onderwerp van debat. Zijn vrijgegeven dagboeken en zijn beroep op het zwijgrecht tijdens een recente hoorzitting zorgen voor veel discussie. In deze analyse van een Amerikaanse hematoloog/oncoloog en voormalig FDA‑directeur wordt uitg…

👍40❤14🔥9👏1

3 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC≈8,160 views56 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Een bijzondere aflevering van HEEL GEZOND met Alexander Tan Alexander Tan vertelt openhartig over hoe emoties, stress en levensverhalen invloed hebben op ons lichaam. Samen met dr. Felix van der Wissel verkent hij de eeuwenoude én wetenschappelijke inzichten die laten zien hoe geest en lichaam samenwerken. Een inspirerend gesprek met praktische tips en een nieuwe kijk op heling. 👉 Bekijk hier: https://www.lighthous…

❤41👍15

22 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC≈11,400 views101 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Nieuw artikel: Het Lancetonderzoek over mRNA‑vaccins - waarom het verhaal niet compleet is In juni 2026 verscheen een grote overzichtsstudie in The Lancet over de veiligheid van mRNA‑vaccins. Veel media presenteerden deze publicatie als sluitend bewijs dat de technologie volledig veilig is. In dit artikel leggen we uit waarom dat beeld te simpel is. Verschillende wetenschappers plaatsen namelijk kritische kantteken…

👍62❤24🔥15

17 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈11,300 views61 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

NIEUWE DATUM: Bergen op Zoom – 27 september De Stilte Schreeuwt blijft volle zalen trekken in bioscopen door heel Nederland. Heb jij hem al gezien? Op 27 september organiseren we een nieuwe bijeenkomst van De Stilte Schreeuwt in Bergen op Zoom. Een middag vol herkenning, verdieping en verbinding voor iedereen die te maken heeft met langdurige klachten na vaccinatie of infectie. De Stilte Schreeuwt blijft mensen ra…

❤45👏12👍2🔥2

14 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC≈9,530 views203 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Academische vrijheid staat onder druk — en blijft essentieel Jona Walk schreef een scherpe analyse over een belangrijke uitspraak van de Commissie Wetenschappelijke Integriteit van de Radboud Universiteit. Centraal staat de vraag of een wetenschapper ter verantwoording mag worden geroepen omdat zij een minderheidsstandpunt inneemt. De universiteit stelt duidelijk van niet: integriteitsprocedures zijn er voor echte s…

❤104👍85👏14

13 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC≈7,150 views283 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Bij herhaling: onze reactie op de uitspraken van Hugo de Jonge In het filmpje waarin Hugo de Jonge spreekt over “een klein groepje artsen”, vergeten we één detail: dat “groepje” bestaat inmiddels uit honderden artsen, verloskundigen, verpleegkundigen en andere zorgprofessionals. En miljoenen mensen lazen onze informatie. Met medical common sense. Met oog voor #firstdonoharm. Het Artsen Collectief blijft staan voor …

❤235👏34🔥13🥰1

11 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC≈8,670 views307 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Artsen Collectief reageert op uitspraken van Hugo de Jonge Laten we voormalig minister De Jonge op één punt gelijk geven: het Artsen Collectief heeft via social media inderdaad “een stevig podium weten te verkrijgen”. Dank aan jullie: onze volgers, onze achterban. Het Artsen Collectief is dankbaar voor iedereen die door onze informatie vanuit de bij ons aangesloten artsen, verloskundigen, verpleegkundigen en vele an…

❤266👍23🔥12👏5🥰1

10 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC≈6,430 views79 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Desinformatiecircus! Weet Hugo de Jonge niet wat “onder ede” betekent? Nu bij Dwarsnieuws - te gast Jona Walk: https://dwarsnieuws.nl/desinformatiecircus-weet-hugo-de-jonge-niet-wat-onder-ede-betekent-dddc-19/ Eindelijk moest Hugo de Jonge vandaag onder ede verantwoording afleggen voor zijn rol in de coronacrisis. Marianne Zwagerman en Maurice de Hond zoeken naar woorden om hun verbijstering over te brengen.

❤66🔥8👍4🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @artsencollectief. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Klokkenluiders 🕊🕊 voor vrijheid 🤜🤛 Nieuws
@klokkenluiders · 39,237
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Artsen Collectief” (@artsencollectief), 20,000 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artsencollectief.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.