Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Артур Лупашко | Ribas

Channel

Артур Лупашко | Ribas

@arturlupashko

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,599subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001804273335
TypeChannel
Username@arturlupashko
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 October 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/arturlupashko

Topic

Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,5912,6142,602.529 August 2026 — 2,613 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,612 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,608 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,605 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,604 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,601 subscribers28 September 2026 — 2,591 subscribers5 October 2026 — 2,614 subscribers12 October 2026 — 2,607 subscribers15 October 2026 — 2,610 subscribers18 October 2026 — 2,604 subscribers21 October 2026 — 2,599 subscribers2,59929 August 202621 October 2026
12 measurements spanning 53 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,588–2,617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Oct 2026, 22:152,599-5
18 Oct 2026, 07:002,604-6
15 Oct 2026, 06:212,610+3
12 Oct 2026, 14:552,607-7
5 Oct 2026, 22:552,614+23
28 Sept 2026, 07:422,591-10
18 Sept 2026, 09:412,601-3
10 Sept 2026, 12:222,604-1
5 Sept 2026, 16:202,605-3
1 Sept 2026, 21:062,608-4
30 Aug 2026, 06:442,612-1
29 Aug 2026, 20:012,613first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

285 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12644.2%
❤12443.5%
🔥207.02%
👏62.11%
😁41.40%
😱20.702%
🙏20.702%
🙈10.351%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arturlupashko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC625 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Спекуляція чи прийняття? Попри те, що Одесу утюжать тільки більше з кожним роком – ми наважились придбати недобудований готель на 66 номерів в першій лінії курорту Кароліно-Бугаз на Одещині. Та плануємо добудувати його до наступного літа. Для себе, не на продаж. Напевно, тому що віримо в Одещину, відчуваємо, що зараз найкращий час для таких інвестицій, попри те, що я живу і працюю в парадигмі того, що війна може пр…

❤19👍6👏2🙏2🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈1,030 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Що визначає успіх готелю? Багато хто скаже: локація, концепція, дизайн, інвестиції. І все це справді важливо. Але якщо подивитися глибше, між успішними та посередніми об’єктами майже завжди є одна ключова різниця — управління. Саме управління визначає, чи стане хороший проєкт сильним бізнесом. Чи повернеться гість вдруге. Чи зможе команда працювати як єдина система. Чи будуть інвестори отримувати очікуваний результ…

👍11❤7👏2

15 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,410 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

В продовження теми про вивчення своїх таланті та талантів у своєї команди задля досягення найкращих результатів з максимальною енергією та мотивацією.

❤4😁3

15 Jul 2026, 16:58 UTC≈1,270 views44 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @wallstreetukrPhoto

Ранні підйоми ведуть не до успіху, а до вигорання, заявив мільярдер і засновник Virgin Group Річард Бренсон. На його думку, кар'єрних висот досягають не ті, хто сліпо наслідує чужі звички, а ті, хто знаходить комфортний саме для себе режим дня. Копіювання чужого розпорядку, за словами бізнесмена, часто призводить лише до втрати енергії та мотивації. @wallstreetukr

❤27👍17

9 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Що важливіше для успіху?

  1. Можливість швидко накопичувати всі чотири види капіталу32%
  2. Можливість вдало перетворювати один капітал на інший68%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Який капітал ви недооцінювали?

  1. Економічний11%
  2. Соціальний34%
  3. Культурний28%
  4. Символічний26%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Якби ви хотіли залишити сину лише один із капіталів (а решта зникли), який би це був і чому?

  1. Економічний45%
  2. Культурний24%
  3. Соціальний28%
  4. Символічний3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

У який капітал ви зараз інвестуєте найбільше (грошей, часу, енергії)?

  1. Економічний69%
  2. Культурний13%
  3. Соціальний13%
  4. Символічний5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC902 viewsread 29 August 2026

Перед публікацією наступних дописів хочу трошки поспілкуватись з вами. Нижче декілька опитувань по минулому дописку про капітали 👇

6 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,090 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Мій висновок з першої лекції. Коли ми говоримо, що гроші — лише інструмент, то маємо на увазі саме це. Економічний капітал — лише одна з форм капіталу. У мудрих руках він допомагає примножувати культурний, соціальний та символічний капітали. А вони, своєю чергою, знову створюють нові економічні можливості. Можливо, по-справжньому багата людина — це не та, яка має найбільше грошей. А та, яка навчилася накопичувати…

👍23❤11

6 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,050 views40 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Як визначити багату і впливову людину, або як я зрозумів П’єра Бурдьє 🙌 Я прослухав три лекції Mobi Meraki про роботу П’єра Бурдьє. У найближчих трьох постах поділюся тезами, які мене найбільше зачепили, і власними висновками. Мені здається, люди часто переоцінюють роль фінансового капіталу. Насправді гроші — лише одна з форм капіталу, і далеко не завжди найвпливовіша. Ми звикли думати, що капітал — це гроші. Але …

❤22👍13🔥5

13 Jun 2026, 16:36 UTC≈1,530 views0 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Чи вірите ви в те, що Україна буде частиною ЄС до 2030 року?

  1. Так34%
  2. Ні46%
  3. Не знаю10%
  4. Я проти вступу в ЄС10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arturlupashko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTCAnonymous Poll148 voters

Що важливіше для успіху?

  1. Можливість швидко накопичувати всі чотири види капіталу32%
  2. Можливість вдало перетворювати один капітал на інший68%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTCAnonymous Poll131 voters

Який капітал ви недооцінювали?

  1. Економічний11%
  2. Соціальний34%
  3. Культурний28%
  4. Символічний26%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTCAnonymous Poll148 voters

Якби ви хотіли залишити сину лише один із капіталів (а решта зникли), який би це був і чому?

  1. Економічний45%
  2. Культурний24%
  3. Соціальний28%
  4. Символічний3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTCAnonymous Poll134 voters

У який капітал ви зараз інвестуєте найбільше (грошей, часу, енергії)?

  1. Економічний69%
  2. Культурний13%
  3. Соціальний13%
  4. Символічний5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Jun 2026, 16:36 UTCAnonymous Poll375 voters

Чи вірите ви в те, що Україна буде частиною ЄС до 2030 року?

  1. Так34%
  2. Ні46%
  3. Не знаю10%
  4. Я проти вступу в ЄС10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Jun 2026, 08:46 UTCAnonymous Poll260 voters

Ваше ставлення до цього?

  1. Негативно23%
  2. Нейтрально38%
  3. Позитивно39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

УкрІнвестКлуб
@UkrInvestClub · 19,422
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 October 2026
Артем Бородатюк
@artemborodatiuk · 26,725
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
Inzhur
@InzhurREIT · 58,257
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
Business Week | Бізнес | Фінанси | Інвестиції
@businessweekua · 25,412
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Артур Лупашко | Ribas” (@arturlupashko), 2,599 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arturlupashko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.