Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for арти флипает

Channel

арти флипает

@artypost

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,911subscribers

+416 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001997601754
TypeChannel
Username@artypost
Description❗️⚠️ВСЁ НАПИСАННОЕ В ДАННОМ КАНАЛЕ НЕ ЯВЛЯЕТСЯ ИНДИВИДУАЛЬНОЙ ИНВЕСТИЦИОННОЙ / ФИНАНСОВОЙ РЕКОМЕНДАЦИЕЙ❗️⚠️ Приват: @artypaybot admin: @artycrpt (ЕДИНСТВЕННЫЙ аккаунт) Отказ от ответственности: https://t.me/artypost/614
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held53
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/artypost

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,48314,91114,6976 August 2026 — 14,495 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,496 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,493 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,483 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,498 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,500 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,511 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,514 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,515 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,524 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,536 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,533 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,537 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,535 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,547 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,549 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,548 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,563 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,564 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,568 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,560 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,559 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,561 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,564 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,565 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,556 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,563 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,585 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,597 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,622 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,669 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,690 subscribers30 September 2026 — 14,687 subscribers10 October 2026 — 14,703 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,706 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,707 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,703 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,706 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,701 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,694 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,690 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,719 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,732 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,740 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,816 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,857 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,877 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,870 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,888 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,890 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,904 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,909 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,911 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
53 measurements spanning 91 days, net +416. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,419–14,975 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 14:1914,911+2
4 Nov 2026, 11:2714,909+5
3 Nov 2026, 09:3914,904+14
1 Nov 2026, 11:1614,890+2
31 Oct 2026, 08:0614,888+18
30 Oct 2026, 09:3414,870-7
29 Oct 2026, 12:5914,877+20
28 Oct 2026, 12:3614,857+41
27 Oct 2026, 11:5114,816+76
26 Oct 2026, 09:5114,740+8
25 Oct 2026, 06:5414,732+13
24 Oct 2026, 09:4514,719+29
22 Oct 2026, 10:2014,690-4
21 Oct 2026, 03:1014,694-7
20 Oct 2026, 01:1914,701-5
19 Oct 2026, 01:4714,706+3
16 Oct 2026, 01:5114,703-4
14 Oct 2026, 22:2914,707+1
13 Oct 2026, 18:4114,706+3
10 Oct 2026, 03:3614,703first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.7%
avg views ÷ 14,911 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,780
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.621%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held62 (27 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total98,200
Reactions total610
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 17:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,940
Videos
≈11
Links
≈579

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,911 reactions across 59 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,06427.2%
🔥99825.5%
❤97024.8%
custom 52200869478625746611844.70%
😭1814.63%
🍌1453.71%
⚡822.10%
❤‍🔥711.82%
🥰561.43%
🐳411.05%
🤔340.869%
🤩280.716%
👏210.537%
👾150.384%
😎90.23%
🕊70.179%
😍40.102%
💋10.026%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,911 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 62 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artypost. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (5.88%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 15:28 UTC≈2,470 views23 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Барни, а чё с фондой? Когда откупать невероятные технологичные акции под правительством Трампа?

🔥12custom 522008694786257466111

4 Nov 2026, 21:55 UTC≈4,460 views29 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Сижу, листаю канальчики, зашёл к себе в канал и понял, что уже почти 15000 подписчиков 🥳 Довольно-таки внушительная цифра, но заметил одну небольшую особенность - количество подписчиков перестало так стремительно расти, как к примеру год назад. И я очень рад, что канал сейчас растёт, хоть и потихоньку. Вероятно, это из-за того, что я перестал в основу частенько коллить, лишь изредка, а только писать постфактум чаще…

❤‍🔥10❤8👍7🔥2custom 52200869478625746612

2 Nov 2026, 20:10 UTC≈5,480 views30 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Закономерный итог Но я не додержал. Есть челы с яйцами кто додержал шорт этого говна?

custom 522008694786257466117🔥7❤6

31 Oct 2026, 18:31 UTC≈6,390 views86 reactions5 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

💰 ИТОГИ ВОРКА ОКТЯБРЯ МЕСЯЦА В ПРИВАТКЕ • Сразу хочу сказать, что октябрь месяц по насыщенности вышел реально как октябрь месяц год назад, вот без шуток. Такое ощущение, что дали полноценно заработать так, как год назад, однако посложнее (самые большие профиты - на хаке Binance, самый ноубрейн профит - 5% с сейла 1WIN, фомо, я не занёс) 😱 В этом месяце было очень много спредов и фандосов, как и самых простых по 1%,…

custom 522008694786257466141❤22🔥16❤‍🔥2🐳2👏2👾1

30 Oct 2026, 09:39 UTC≈6,330 views51 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

😱 КРУПНЕЙШИЙ ВЗЛОМ БИРЖИ В ИСТОРИИ КРИПТЫ (BINANCE) Вчера вечером пошли сомнительные выводы на миллиарды $ различных токенов начиная от $BTC и заканчивая всякими щитками на кошелёк хакера ⭐️ Сначала этому никто не придал значения, однако спустя минут 10-15 новостники начали разгонять новость, что Binance потенциально был взломан и поступают всё больше и больше выводов с бирж на кошелёк выше. На этих новостях люди …

❤28👍10custom 52200869478625746618🔥3🤔2

29 Oct 2026, 21:17 UTC≈5,500 views32 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Отработал в приваточке с пацанами лонг на фаде как с $BGB однажды На твите от бинанса палка тейки закрыла мне, спасибо Я дальше работать искать ситуации

🔥15❤8custom 52200869478625746616🍌3

29 Oct 2026, 20:57 UTC≈5,690 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://t.me/artyshitpost/4916 Ну черный лебедь, но не сильно, типо темно серый Как бы там можно было Лонга БНБ дцашить на дампе, откупить ансем, в парочку спредов залететь, XMR лонгануть под новость о взломе Короче говоря, надо дальше следить, угнанные деньги лежат, мб чет будет интересное происходить еще, наблюдаем.

❤8custom 52200869478625746612

29 Oct 2026, 10:33 UTC≈5,690 views17 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Листинг $PREDICT на альфе (ну и биржи соответственно тоже) 30 октября 12:00 МСК Сегодня было Pre-TGE, в стакан 20 млн монет пойдет только с сейла + ещё дроп. Короче я до сих пор в шортах сижу, планирую фиксить ниже 1.2$ + доедайте спреды с Bybit-Aster (1.5-2% + фандинг) Колл был дан

🔥10custom 52200869478625746615❤‍🔥2

28 Oct 2026, 09:33 UTC≈6,360 views38 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

😳 МЕТА ПРЕМАРКЕТОВ И ЛИСТИНГОВ ВЕРНЁТСЯ? Совсем недавно Aster / Binance / Bybit / Gate залистили к себе новый токен на премаркет фьючи - $PREDICT 🤔 На моей памяти Binance листил премаркет фьючерс очень давно. Предварительная оценка $PREDICT по текущим - около 1.65 млрд $ FDV (Polymarket юзеры оценивают возможность FDV выше 1.5 млрд $ FDV через день после листинга в 54%, моё мнение что будет ниже 1.5 млрд $ FDV) • …

❤‍🔥18custom 52200869478625746618❤5🔥5👾2

25 Oct 2026, 05:03 UTC≈7,630 views39 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Гм, всё таки у меня вышло додержать шорты и я вышел в профит, сумму называть не буду, думаю это все равно не особо будет иметь значения для вас По крайней мере для меня так точно, сейчас скажу одну вещь, многие 100%, поймут, это когда ты пересидел ебанутый минус, вышел в профит, но потраченные нервы перебивают этот профит и ты всё равно сидишь в ахуе. Для себя вынес уроки - ждать побольше конфирмов для того, чтобы …

🔥19🥰6🍌5custom 52200869478625746615❤3🤩1

23 Oct 2026, 21:15 UTC≈6,860 views37 reactions2 Starsread 5 November 2026

На самом деле пздц много ситуаций там дали, я за всем следил, но тупо ничего не делал и смотрел, так как вся маржа застряла в этих шортах, которые тянул. Там было куча спредов в десятки % с спотами, даже с дексом в 30-50% давали спокойно заливаться, также можно было шортить под справедливую Короче дальше лень писать, в общем было куча ситуаций с этим $IRYS, я сильно поспешил и пересайзил одновременно, биг ошибка Н…

❤26custom 522008694786257466111

23 Oct 2026, 20:29 UTC≈6,250 views43 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Полностью признаю что: хуёвый рр, пересайзил, изначально взял безосновательно чисто на сквизе, и типо долбаёб, сказать больше нечего, можете хуесосить, но я пересидел, меня простили, можно сказать что это первый и последний раз когда я мог допустить такое, впредь максимально осторожнее

custom 522008694786257466118❤‍🔥12❤6😭3🤩2⚡1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @artypost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“арти флипает” (@artypost), 14,911 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artypost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.