Channel name was changed to «עו״ד אסף דוק נתפס על חם»

Channel
עו״ד אסף דוק נתפס על חם
@asafdok
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001413486122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asafdok |
| Description | עו"ד אסף דוק נתפס על חם |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asafdok |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 4 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 11
- Videos
- 9
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 50s
- Average length
- 1m 25s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
קיימים משרדי עורכי דין פליליים רבים, וכל אחד מהם מצהיר על עצמו כמשרד מוביל ומצליח. גם עורך דין אסף דוק מצהיר שהוא מצליח ומפרסם את הצלחותיו הרבהים אבל בפועל יש לו מלא הפסדים קשים שהוא בוחר שלא לפרסם. ניתן לראות אותם באתר dokcaught.com האם אפשר להאמין לעורך דין שקונה לייקים בתיאלנד לפוסטים שלו בפייסבוק? שהלייקים מזויפים אולי גם תוכן הפוסטים? הכל מחוק אין מספרים לאמת האם מדובר במסך אמיתי או מזויף. אבל אין ספק שתיאלנדי…
https://ednakarnaval.com/הפסד-צורב-לעוד-אסף-דוק-וגיא-צברי-פסד-בה/ הפסד צורב לעו”ד אסף דוק וגיא צברי: פס”ד בהעדר הגנה נגד תושב חו”ל בוטל אחרי 5 שנים כי על ההזמנה לדין לא היתה חותמת
https://t.me/iv?rhash=a27e7fac1a56e7&url=https://ednakarnaval.com/%d7%94%d7%a4%d7%a1%d7%93-%d7%a6%d7%95%d7%a8%d7%91-%d7%9c%d7%a2%d7%95%d7%93-%d7%90%d7%91%d7%99%d7%97%d7%99-%d7%95%d7%a8%d7%93%d7%99-%d7%94%d7%95%d7%a6%d7%99%d7%90-%d7%a4%d7%a1%d7%93-%d7%9b%d7%95/
אסף דוק נתפס על חם
אסף דוק נתפס על חם
אסף דוק נתפס על חם
אסף דוק נתפס על חם
Video, posted without a caption
תלונה איסור פרסום
אליאור גיל
עורך דין גיא צברי מפחד לקבל כתב תביעה
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @asafdok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“עו״ד אסף דוק נתפס על חם” (@asafdok), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asafdok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.