Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SBA - Ascension Works TV

Channel

SBA - Ascension Works TV

@ascensionworkstv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,841subscribers

-91 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001389473425
TypeChannel
Username@ascensionworkstv
Created14 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ascensionworkstv

Growth

6,8416,9326,886.56 August 2026 — 6,932 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,932 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,926 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,918 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,915 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,900 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,892 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,879 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,872 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,864 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,857 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,841 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 32 days, net -91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,827–6,946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 06:556,841-16
2 Sept 2026, 20:466,857-7
31 Aug 2026, 03:246,864-8
27 Aug 2026, 18:576,872-7
24 Aug 2026, 14:486,879-13
21 Aug 2026, 00:136,892-8
17 Aug 2026, 14:346,900-15
14 Aug 2026, 01:066,915-3
10 Aug 2026, 13:286,918-8
7 Aug 2026, 09:186,926-6
6 Aug 2026, 10:206,932no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:526,932first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 6,841 subscribers
Avg views / post
775
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held28 (2 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total4,648
Reactions total121
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

585 reactions across 28 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
25543.6%
👍16828.7%
🔥396.67%
👀305.13%
213.59%
🙏183.08%
🤔162.74%
👏152.56%
💯101.71%
🎉71.20%
😁50.855%
🤯10.171%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 585 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC506 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/S6w7K4ZuazY

👍10🔥1🤔1🙏1

Signed Debbie Graham

14 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC799 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/u6ewrnzAzvs

👍10🔥51

Signed Debbie Graham

13 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC896 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026

I am SUPER excited to work with Jack Osbourne, Serena DC and Michael Mazzola at Spark. I met them a few weeks ago when I flew to their studio to shoot a couple of shows. We can't wait to see Spark grow into the dominant streamer for the paranormal genre. https://www.foxla.com/video/fmc-7j42fg92c0y5w7xj

20👍31🔥1

Signed Corey Goode

12 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC806 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026

We are also working to complete our two upcoming documentaries, CONTACTED and The Regression Files and publish them this Fall. Next year we will produce a few more unscripted projects, including ALIEN MANIA: The Subculture War for Disclosure and Haunted Renovation... We will have other major news for our AWTV members in the coming weeks.

15🔥4🎉31

Signed Corey Goode

12 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC943 views31 reactionsread 20 August 2026

HUGE NEWS!!! Ascension Works TV is pleased to announce that we have formed a Strategic Alliance and Content Collaboration with SPARK! Co-founded by Jack Osbourne (Ozzy's Son), Serena DC & Michael Mazzola and is a network devoted to Consciousness, Spirituality, Alternative Health, UFO Disclosure & the Paranormal. They already have over 2,500 titles and are creating new content with some of the biggest names in the Par

23🔥52🎉1

Signed Corey Goode

11 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC698 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/k2sKw6Z_U_Q?is=I9RxTATLJickHvGo Aug 11, 7:15pm

92👏1🤔1

Signed Corey Goode

6 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC≈1,450 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://time.com/article/2026/08/06/america-taking-extraterrestrials-seriously/

19

Signed Corey Goode

6 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC≈1,020 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @realKarliBonnePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👍17😁5

Signed Corey Goode

2 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,350 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/interstellaruap/status/2083635006887309637?s=46&t=JukwaMDXiss6JnjoC0W-Pg

👀11🤔4

Signed Corey Goode

30 Jul 2026, 21:32 UTC≈1,350 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://x.com/disgustipated42/status/2082904866650038320

8👍6

Signed Corey Goode

30 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,410 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Weird... during the era of AI, we can't trust anything. https://youtu.be/C6WFjVgtM8c?si=pOY_qnb0LOT3MCgG

👀123👍1

Signed Corey Goode

29 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC≈1,180 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/2g9V0VTzAH4

14🔥7👍3🤯1

Signed Debbie Graham

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ascensionworkstv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Medical Medium
@MedicalMedium · 54,298
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Jordan Sather
@jordansather · 47,938
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SBA - Ascension Works TV” (@ascensionworkstv), 6,841 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ascensionworkstv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.