Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АСМЫСЛ

Channel

АСМЫСЛ

@asmysl_1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,077subscribers

-112 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001721849320
TypeChannel
Username@asmysl_1
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/asmysl_1

Growth

10,07710,18910,1336 August 2026 — 10,189 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,189 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,179 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,173 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,168 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,154 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,144 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,143 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,141 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,136 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,134 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,133 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,126 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,123 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,119 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,114 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,113 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,111 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,104 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,103 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,099 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,096 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,094 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,084 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,083 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,077 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 31 days, net -112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,060–10,206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 14:5910,077-6
4 Sept 2026, 07:1910,083-1
2 Sept 2026, 18:3910,084-10
1 Sept 2026, 16:4410,094-2
31 Aug 2026, 19:1310,096-3
30 Aug 2026, 16:1310,099-4
29 Aug 2026, 14:0210,103-1
28 Aug 2026, 14:2710,104-7
27 Aug 2026, 12:5310,111-2
25 Aug 2026, 18:2210,113-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:0610,114-5
23 Aug 2026, 05:3310,119-4
21 Aug 2026, 20:2810,123-3
20 Aug 2026, 15:3410,126-7
19 Aug 2026, 15:0710,133-1
18 Aug 2026, 14:4610,134-2
17 Aug 2026, 18:0510,136-5
14 Aug 2026, 23:5310,141-2
13 Aug 2026, 11:4810,143-1
12 Aug 2026, 09:0710,144first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.8%
avg views ÷ 10,077 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,410
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held49 (28 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total109,030
Reactions total6,253
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 55s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,664 reactions across 49 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯1,77518.4%
1,36414.1%
🔥1,17612.2%
😁8208.49%
🤬7367.62%
👍6596.82%
🤔4875.04%
❤‍🔥4014.15%
👏3453.57%
🤡3453.57%
🥰2792.89%
😭2502.59%
🤩1841.90%
🫡1341.39%
😢1281.32%
😱960.993%
🤣900.931%
🙏680.704%
🤯510.528%
🕊280.29%
29 further kinds2482.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,664 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 49 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @asmysl_1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈1,700 views152 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Исполнительницей теракта стала 24-летняя россиянка. Пока не понятно, была она заукраинкой типа террористки Треповой или её обработали и превратили в биодрон. Но путь её установлен точно. Приехала из другого города в Питер, установила СВУ под автомобиль офицера и сразу в аэропорт. Преступница успела улететь в Турцию. ФСБ запросила экстрадицию, но девушка буквально сразу улетела в Молдавию. Готов спорить, что оттуда

🤬140💯10🤯2

27 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC≈2,220 views129 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Как и предполагалось. В Санкт-Петербурге очередной теракт. Взорвали автомобиль военнослужащего. Офицер погиб, его жена ранена.

🤬116😢7😡2😱21👍1

27 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC≈2,210 views195 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Перепись идиотов продолжается. Европейское издание Politico утверждает, что глава ЦРУ прилетал в Москву, чтобы просить Путина не нападать на Прибалтику. Верим 🤡

😁177💯85👍2👎1🤝1🤬1

26 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC≈2,360 views199 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

На связи ночной АСМЫСЛ. Поскольку проблема с коммуникацией сохраняется, то я вам кое-что расскажу. Предварительно десять человек стали жертвами массированного ракетного удара по центру Донецку. Больше десятка раненных. Не понимаю, почему некоторые до сих пор пишут про атаку на ТЦ "Донецк-Сити", потому что сам торговик практически не пострадал и завтра откроется для посетителей, просто чуть позже обычного. Зато око

💯147🙏23🤔146🤝32🤬2👍1

26 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈2,430 views149 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Также украинские ракеты ударили по центру Донецка. Ущерб устанавливается.

🤬134🕊8😡4👍1👎1😭1

26 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈2,430 views170 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Очередной украинский дрон. Очередной пассажирский автобус. На этот раз в ЛНР. Девять из пятнадцати пассажиров убиты. Остальные ранены. https://t.me/bazabazon/48583

😢105🤬52😱5🕊4😡21👍1

26 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,520 views191 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Путин не встречался с главой ЦРУ, уверяет Песков. Говорит, что контакт был только по линии спецслужб, но президент проинформирован об итогах переговоров. Ну и, мол, не надо преувеличивать значимость таких контактов для урегулирования конфликта на Украине. Действительно, подумаешь. Верим. Конкретно сейчас не так важно, насколько значим или нет был приезд главы ЦРУ в Москву, потому что наблюдаю другую серьезную пробл

🤔130💯439🤡2🙏21👍1🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC≈2,680 views157 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Совсем забыл сказать. За последние годы контактов такого уровня было всего два. Первый перед началом СВО. Глава ЦРУ прилетал в Москву, чтобы отговорить, предупредить и вообще понять, насколько серьезна ситуация. Второй раз был осенью 2022 года, когда Россия совершила "ряд тактических перегруппировок" и была вынуждена начать частичную мобилизацию. Встреча с нашим главой СВР проходила в Анкаре и очевидно, что америк

🔥120🤔2743😴3

25 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC≈2,680 views213 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Погодите, а как так происходит? Ещё несколько месяцев назад все в Европе и США говорили, что Украина побеждает. Трамп говорил об успехах ВСУ. Зеленский всего в начале августа отчитался об успешном контрнаступлении на Запорожье, якобы откинули российские войска на несколько десятков км. А уже сегодня в Москву прилетает директор ЦРУ обсуждать перемирие и отказ от взаимных ударов по энергетической и гражданской инфрас

👍159🤔299💯6😁3👏2🤷2🍾1

24 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC≈2,840 views204 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Это сильно, конечно, без договора с площадкой и властями города продать 115 тысяч билетов. По предварительным данным, это 1,5 миллиарда рублей. Но и много говорит о покупателях. Буквально с первых минут продажи говорилось про возможный подвох и невозвратные билеты. Но Россия — щедрая душа. Ни один сбор на СВО, кажется, таких сумм не видел. А ведь некоторые до сих пор утверждают, что экономика наша «разорвана в кло

😁15918💯9🤡9💊3🤷‍♂21🍌1

24 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈2,860 views159 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Уэста в России не будет. По крайней мере "Газпром Арена" отказалась давать сцену рэперу. С другой стороны уж лучше так, чем за день до выступления внезапно объявили бы, что на шар поднимется петь Шаман. Батальон "Сомали" уже мчит на Беверли Хиллз?

😱88😁48🤩12👌3💯32🤝2👎1

24 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC≈2,860 views186 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Фото от противника. Это обычная фура, в которой замаскированная платформа для запуска беспилотников FirePoint. Тех самых, что массово летят по российским тылам: жилым домам, детским центрам, НПЗ, складам Wildberries или Ozon (кстати, привет все фольгированным шапочкам, которые ранее рассказывали про тайный договорнячок, что кроме складов ВБ якобы никаких больше не тронут). Кто-то в командовании ВСУ очень хотел похв

👍127💯43🤬84🤔2👏1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @asmysl_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Денис Шалюта, блогер из Сибири
@shalyuta · 43,004
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АСМЫСЛ” (@asmysl_1), 10,077 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asmysl_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.