5 measurements spanning 90 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 14:22
58
no change
8 Nov 2026, 13:47
58
+57
18 Aug 2026, 14:43
1
-47
11 Aug 2026, 11:43
48
no change
10 Aug 2026, 15:16
48
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
110.8%
avg views ÷ 58 subscribers
Avg views / post
64.3
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
37 (26 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
1,221
Reactions total
128
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
69
Videos
35
Links
80
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
33s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
312 reactions across 31 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5465589786762843931
35
11.2%
custom 5463341770815350670
34
10.9%
custom 5314783975942681592
30
9.62%
custom 5204134739245548062
25
8.01%
custom 5474207819030899077
22
7.05%
custom 5314540069044907278
21
6.73%
custom 5319184625203973010
19
6.09%
custom 5463215052100234516
17
5.45%
custom 5188359998677230276
16
5.13%
custom 5317011547845849130
14
4.49%
custom 5188347560451940290
13
4.17%
custom 5321479267316439345
12
3.85%
custom 5321401335134854498
10
3.21%
custom 5314739097829404487
9
2.88%
custom 5408958624330461740
9
2.88%
custom 5242296846520448897
6
1.92%
custom 5314292855022318245
4
1.28%
custom 5370898672852682098
4
1.28%
custom 5393543797726551261
4
1.28%
custom 5350368879501666219
3
0.962%
2 further kinds
5
1.60%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
У нас во флуде проводится ивент:
⚔️ ИВЕНТ «ЛУЧШИЙ ХАЙЛАЙТ» ⚔️
🔥 Приветствуем всех участников сообщества!
Объявляем о старте нового события — «Лучший Хайлайт»! Покажи своё мастерство, удиви судей и поборись за денежный приз! 🏆
👥 Количество мест ограничено — 30 участников!
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📝 РЕГИСТРАЦИЯ
Для участия необходимо написать организатору @KIRITO_DARIUS лс и отправить профиль своего игрового аккаунта.
🎡 По…
🌟ссоциации 2
💫💫💫💫💫💫💫💫💫💫💫
Кто вы из славянской мифологии.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
🌟словия проведения:
Для того что бы участвовать в ассоциации,вам нужно написать в комментариях —
💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
— Название в моно
— Ссылка на инфо
— Ссылка на лайф
— Аватарка флуда
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Заявки принимаются до 10.11
Результаты - ?
Места ограничены — 10/?
⛓⛓⛓⛓⛓⛓⛓⛓⛓⛓
#репост
⚔:: Также мы сейчас в поисках кастома на это воскресенье.
🤩Желательно время — 19-20:00 по мск.
🤩Потный или рофл на ваше усмотрение
Писать: @lr0ecLo
#Repost_MHeart
🌸🌸Первое свидание… Вечер дрожит золотом света на стёклах витрин. Девушка у зеркала кружится, а подруги шепчут: — Ты прекрасна. Иди.🌸🌸
🌸🌸‹‹ ᴀsᴛʀᴀʟ ꜰʟᴜx ⋆— Вы первое свидание — то самое тихое волнение на краю неизвестности: может быть, впереди — целая история, а может, всё оборвётся, так и не успев начаться.💋
🌀Он ждёт у дверей, не смея дышать, и вдруг замирает, увидев её. В тот миг ему больше не нужно гадать: с…
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @astralf1uxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“‹‹ ᴀsᴛʀᴀʟ ꜰʟᴜx ᶫᶦᶠᵉ ⋆” (@astralf1uxx), 58 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astralf1uxx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
