Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Astronomy Knowledge

Channel

Astronomy Knowledge

@astronomic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,016subscribers

-84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001426227832
TypeChannel
Username@astronomic
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/astronomic

Growth

10,01610,11210,0646 August 2026 — 10,100 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,100 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,098 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,100 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,098 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,096 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,102 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,105 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,106 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,107 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,112 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,110 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,107 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,103 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,099 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,094 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,090 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,091 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,092 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,087 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,080 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,074 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,067 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,060 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,051 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,037 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,016 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 34 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,002–10,126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 21:3710,016-21
6 Sept 2026, 11:4110,037-14
4 Sept 2026, 03:4010,051-9
2 Sept 2026, 18:0410,060-7
1 Sept 2026, 18:5510,067-7
31 Aug 2026, 16:1310,074-6
30 Aug 2026, 16:1410,080-7
29 Aug 2026, 14:1310,087-5
28 Aug 2026, 17:0210,092+1
27 Aug 2026, 15:0810,091+1
26 Aug 2026, 12:2510,090-4
25 Aug 2026, 13:2410,094-5
24 Aug 2026, 15:0410,099-4
22 Aug 2026, 22:1410,103-4
21 Aug 2026, 08:4710,107-3
20 Aug 2026, 10:5810,110-2
18 Aug 2026, 14:4210,112+5
17 Aug 2026, 14:2610,107+1
16 Aug 2026, 08:5210,106+1
14 Aug 2026, 23:2610,105first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 43s
Average length
1m 43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

342 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11934.8%
🔥11132.5%
6819.9%
🤩164.68%
🤯133.80%
🏆72.05%
😢41.17%
🤣30.877%
👌10.292%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 342 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 November 2025 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jun 2026, 09:08 UTC≈2,310 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Did you know? There’s a planet made of diamond! 💎✨ Scientists discovered a planet called 55 Cancri e, about 40 light-years away, that is mostly made of carbon. Because of the extreme pressure and heat, most of that carbon is thought to be in the form of diamond!

👍149🔥3

28 Mar 2026, 04:15 UTC≈4,140 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

25 brightest stars in the night sky. 🌃

18👍7

15 Mar 2026, 04:03 UTC≈4,170 views28 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

A visual representation of Size of Jupiter compared to Earth.

🔥17👍83

17 Feb 2026, 16:03 UTC≈4,370 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Can wormholes do the magic for humanity? What do you think?👇

🔥128👍3🤯1

12 Feb 2026, 15:17 UTC≈3,830 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

If the sun stopped shining suddenly, it would take eight minutes for people on earth to see it, because of the time it takes light to travel to earth.

🔥18👍62

3 Feb 2026, 05:09 UTC≈3,510 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

The Moon is Slowly Drifting Away: • Our Moon is moving about 3.8 centimeters (1.5 inches) away from Earth each year. • This process has been happening for billions of years and is why the Earth's rotation is slowing down, making our days longer.

🔥17👍63

2 Feb 2026, 13:23 UTC≈3,010 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

The Universe Has a "Cosmic Microwave Background" (CMB): • This is the oldest light in the universe, a faint glow of radiation left over from the Bi Bang. • It's like an echo of the universe's infancy, providing crucial evidence for the Big Bang theory and helping us understand the early universe.

🔥81👍1🤯1

21 Jan 2026, 15:04 UTC≈3,800 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

• 🕰️ A day on Venus is longer than its year

14👍6

18 Jan 2026, 08:03 UTC≈3,320 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Two diamond shaped, rubble-pile asteroids have been observed near Earth, and were photographed by unmanned spacecrafts in 2018 and 2019. Scientists at OIST and Rutgers University have used a simple model normally reserved for the flow of grains to explain their unusual shape. In this image, a photograph of one of the asteroids, Bennu, is shown on the left. On the right, a simulation using the model is shown. As can b

👍4🔥43

4 Jan 2026, 12:42 UTC≈3,100 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

There are "Rogue Planets": Some planets don’t orbit any star at all. They wander through the cold darkness of interstellar space alone, having been kicked out of their original solar systems.

🔥8😢4

3 Jan 2026, 09:03 UTC≈3,030 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Today we are going to have discussions Topic Do you believe in the existence of extraterrestrial life? Share why you don't believe or believe any thing rather than politics and bad words is allowed Comment 👇

🔥13👍31

2 Jan 2026, 17:06 UTC≈2,370 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Did you know? There’s a planet made of diamond! 💎✨ Scientists discovered a planet called 55 Cancri e, about 40 light-years away, that is mostly made of carbon. Because of the extreme pressure and heat, most of that carbon is thought to be in the form of diamond!

👍131👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @astronomic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Science in telegram
@science · 120,435
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Iit Jee Mains Advance Materials
@IIT_JEE_Mains_Advance_Materials · 94,347
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 August 2026
𝐂𝐌𝐊 𝐖𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬
@CMK_Wallpapers · 103,061
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Astronomy Knowledge” (@astronomic), 10,016 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astronomic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.