Как же я кайфую от этих фото ✨🍂🪨🫧
❤28🔥20⚡5💔1😁1

Channel
@asyabora
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
513subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001267347114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asyabora |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asyabora |
Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 513 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 511 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 510 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 512 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 506 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 510 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 510 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
374 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 217 | 58.0% | |
| 🔥 | 82 | 21.9% | |
| 💯 | 55 | 14.7% | |
| ⚡ | 17 | 4.55% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.535% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.267% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 374 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как же я кайфую от этих фото ✨🍂🪨🫧
❤28🔥20⚡5💔1😁1
Запись прямого эфира Продуктивно пообщались Надеюсь для многих информация будет полезна ⚡️🍊
❤23🔥5💯3
За все годы, что я нахожусь в теме ФЕ, я наблюдаю, как люди постепенно уходят с фруктов — что тут сказать, это ожидаемо. Пока у человека есть сомнения, пока не закрыты фундаментальные теоретические вопросы, перейти на фрукты надолго невозможно. На такой неадекватной диете, которой придерживается большинство адептов "фруктоедения", проблемы рано или поздно неизбежны. В конце концов здесь останутся только единицы, те,…
💯19❤14🔥9😁1
Давно не было эфиров, приходите, пообщаемся 😉
❤9🔥6⚡5
Я вам говорил, что намечается эфир с очень интересным гостем, и вот время анонса настало! В эту среду 29 июля в 17:00 по Москве запланирован прямой эфир с Асей! Ася уже более 5-ти лет на фруктах - настоящий эксперт в этой области! Конечно же поговорим про биохимию и не только! Не пропустите!
❤24🔥14⚡5
Эмпатия заложена в нас с детства, но общественный конформизм постепенно притупляет ее, превращая убийство в нормальность 🔪 Если бы каждому человеку пришлось убивать животных ради мяса собственными руками, вегетарианцев стало бы гораздо больше.
❤18💯14🔥7
Мысли вслух.. 💭😌
❤16💯6🔥5
После того, как во Вьетнаме пропали вкусные манго, я переключилась на сахарные яблоки 🍏 (не знаю, какой гений их так назвал, ведь на яблоки они совершенно не похожи)) Здесь они просто потрясающие! Ванильно-кремовые, очень нежные и невероятно сытные. По сладости, кажется, даже превосходят бананы. Сахарное яблоко относится к роду Annona, куда также входят черимойя, саусеп и роллиния. Это одно из самых древних семейст…
❤29💯3🔥2
Ты – семечко в саду перемен Помни, что вся земная биосфера будет "целовать" каждого, кто решится изменить свой образ жизни и понять законы природы. Мы не существуем отдельно от мира — мы вплетены в него тысячами связей, поэтому, делая разумный выбор, мы неизбежно меняем и мир вокруг. #мысли
❤27💯9🔥6
Редукционизм как главный подход к вопросам питания и здоровья прочно засел в наших головах. Из каждого утюга только и слышно: "А добрал ли ты норму белка за день?" В погоне за отдельными нутриентами мы часто забываем, что организм — это целостная система и, разложив всё на компоненты, можно собрать разве что конструктор, но никак не Жизнь. Всё потому, что у целого появляются свойства, которых нет ни у одной из его ч…
❤29🔥8⚡2💯1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @asyabora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bora bora” (@asyabora), 513 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asyabora.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.