Channel
@atomtoday
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
670subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001488251351 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @atomtoday |
| Created | 23 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/atomtoday |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 670 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 671 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 672 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 672 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
96 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 41 | 42.7% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 31.3% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 7.29% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 5.21% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 3.13% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 3.13% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 3.13% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 3.13% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Продолжаем готовить реквизит для выставки детекторов радиации в поисках новых образов. Волшебная палочка. Вот, что не хватало на стенде КБ Радар вместо вот этих скучных ручных досмотровых детекторов.
👍4🔥1
Всем привет! накидал небольшую статью по добавлению снимков в подложку atom swift и картописец. Готов ответить на вопросы https://telegra.ph/Dobavlyaem-spektralnuyu-sputnikovuyu-podlozhku-dlya-kartirovaniya-07-08
🔥3❤1
КБ Радар на Урале, север Челябинской области. со 2 по 16 июля. Буду условно доступен по ситуации. Можно планировать личные встречи. Программа минимум: Повторить без фанатизма подход к краям оси ВУРСа, где поток бета частиц с грунта становится заметным на низкой высоте от грунта. Будет использована пара детекторов: газоразрядный детектор Atom Tag с датчиком сбм-20 в новой редакции и слюдяной детектор Atom Pro (не се…
❤5🔥4⚡3
Обновляем реквизит для выставочного стенда "Погладь кота" У этого экземпляра спинка длиннее. А ещё есть хвост. Скоро отправится в ателье вставлять в пузо молнию и немного поменяем набивку. А как прощались в магазине с этим последним экземпляром!
🔥5👍3
Atom.Today ☢️ pinned a video
В темно-синем лесу, где-то рядом с Троицком. Группа Чартер. Физик-ядерщик. Более менее студийный вариант выложен здесь: https://youtu.be/6JISiK1a5g8?is=Rl0GbdHiEHZtInU-
👍3❤1
Atom.Today ☢️ pinned «Про пожары в "Чернобыльской зоне". 1. Локация - около села Тарасовщина Киевской области. Это дальше, чем 50 км от чернобыльской АЭС примерно на юг (направление примерно на Киев). Формально это не 30 км зона отчуждения как все подумали. Но мы же понимаем, что…»
Про пожары в "Чернобыльской зоне". 1. Локация - около села Тарасовщина Киевской области. Это дальше, чем 50 км от чернобыльской АЭС примерно на юг (направление примерно на Киев). Формально это не 30 км зона отчуждения как все подумали. Но мы же понимаем, что 30 км ничего не ограничивается. 2. Цезий-137. Примем радиотоксичность цезия-137 за единицу. Плотность площадного радиоактивного загрязнения по цезию-137 в этом …
🤔3😱3
А есть у нас кто в Болгарии? Если есть желание найти что-нибудь интересное за пределами огороженной территории, пишите. Если там есть миграция радионуклидов за забор, это не сложно подтвердить. Но не прямыми измерениями. Надо искать пятнистость. Пишите, научу плохому https://dariknews.bg/novini/bylgariia/sled-signal-za-radiaciia-speshna-proverka-v-malinova-dolina-ima-li-opasnost-za-horata-2453597
😨3👍1
Сообщение для жителей Перми. Пермь сейчас находится примерно на границе циклона и антициклона. Вполне возможно, что в целом могут быть антициклонные проявления. Это означает, что атмосферные загрязнения "закачиваются" в нижнюю часть приземного слоя. Поэтому атмосферные загрязнения могут увеличивать свою концентрацию в нижней части приземного слоя. Не пренебрегайте любыми примитивными средствами защиты респираторного …
👍6
Atom.Today ☢️ pinned a photo
Выпадения чернобыльского цезия-137 из стратосферы заметно снизили свою интенсивность примерно к 1999 году, через 13 лет после аварии. Процесс продолжается. График взят из годового отчёта НПО Тайфун за 2019 год #чернобыльскаяавария
😭5👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @atomtoday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Atom.Today ☢️” (@atomtoday), 670 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atomtoday.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.