Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ATPtalk

Channel

ATPtalk

@atptalk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,139subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002483927281
TypeChannel
Username@atptalk
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/atptalk

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1391,1771,1587 August 2026 — 1,177 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,177 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,176 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,175 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,172 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,168 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,167 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,163 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,159 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,152 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,147 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,145 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,139 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,133–1,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:161,139-6
14 Sept 2026, 06:211,145-2
11 Sept 2026, 00:181,147-5
5 Sept 2026, 17:561,152-7
1 Sept 2026, 22:451,159-4
29 Aug 2026, 13:441,163-4
26 Aug 2026, 10:041,167-1
23 Aug 2026, 14:171,168-4
20 Aug 2026, 02:071,172-3
17 Aug 2026, 11:151,175-1
14 Aug 2026, 08:281,176-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:321,177no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:541,177first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,052 reactions across 19 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣30529.0%
😁13713.0%
11711.1%
💯959.03%
👍847.98%
custom 6325330269624600344777.32%
custom 5244673458083734407706.65%
custom 5460912146470672891575.42%
custom 6327716471849878717201.90%
🔥191.81%
😭181.71%
👏121.14%
🤡100.951%
😢90.856%
🤔70.665%
🤮40.38%
🫡40.38%
😱20.19%
🍾10.095%
💩10.095%
3 further kinds30.285%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,052 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC583 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Немного не хватило Андрюшеньке Рубкову. Совсем чуть-чуть подтянуть бы приём, прибавить немного в том, что касается попадания первым мячом, самую малость бустануть одноручный бичхенд и двуручный бомжхенд, добавить капельку выдержки на важных поинтах и уже можно было бы замахнуться на громкую победу над шаном, который полгода не играл из-за травмы

custom 632533026962460034427😁13👏5👍3😭3🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC644 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Топ фото для вашего рабочего стола скачать бесплатно

🤣14custom 632533026962460034411😭41🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,300 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Айяйяй Снова немного не повезло и алкаши не справились с тем, чтобы раскидать в расписании аж целых два матча (четвертьфиналы, на секундочку) игрового дня в мужской сетке. Женские матчи тоже будут идти параллельно

🤣51🫡43👍1custom 63253302696246003441

3 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,760 views78 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вообще этот пост-сравнение Медведева и Зверева хочется дополнить одной мыслью, которая не даёт мне покоя уже очень давно, но сейчас она уже прямо перезрела. Оформить её можно в прямой вопрос: Как так получается, что репутация тотального чокера настолько плотно закрепилась за Звирем, в то время как Медведев каким-то парадоксальным образом этого избежал? Ну вот правда, как? У него и поражения в 1-2 кругах шлемов, кот

💯528🤔7😭7👍4

3 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,240 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему-то после промазанной первой подачи на брейкпоинте при 5-6 было ровно нуль сомнений в том, что для Медведева матч закончится двойной ошибкой

18😁12👍8custom 54609121464706728915💯1😢1

3 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC≈1,500 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Итак, прямо сейчас одновременно играют: - Джокович - Медведев - Шиннер - Хуркач с Паулем - Жодар. Зато на отдельный слот вынесен вечерний матч Альяссима и Чжена на ЦЕНТРАЛЬНОМ КОРТЕ (как они оказались на центр корте для меня вообще загадка тысячелетия). Ну и скажите мне, разве я не прав, когда говорю, что уимбльдон — с запасом худший тбш. Ну это ведь прям форменные пидоры

😁75💯17👍124🤡2👏1🤣1🤯1

2 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC≈1,250 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣292

30 Jun 2026, 21:26 UTC≈1,260 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всего за пару часов сильно продвинулся в понимании женского тенниса и, кажется, я готов выкатить самый объективный power ranking WTA тура. Итак. 1. Ига Свентек (до положительного теста на доппинг) 2. Арина Соболенка 3. Елена Рыбалкина 4. Мирра Андреева 5. Каролина Мухова 6. Джессика Пегула 7. Зейнеп Сомнез 8. Анна Калинская 9. Аманда Анисимова 10. Анастасия Потапова (после получения австралийского паспорта) Достойн

🤣4221custom 546091214647067289111💯1🔥1

30 Jun 2026, 20:59 UTC≈1,080 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Фиксируем прибыль

custom 524467345808373440725custom 632533026962460034412😁72👍1🤬1

30 Jun 2026, 20:20 UTC≈1,000 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ещё и точку входа для страждущих дала на решающий сет, ну что за чудо Щас поживимся

🤣22custom 524467345808373440714

30 Jun 2026, 19:48 UTC≈1,000 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как же Марта Джонсон технично сводила Серену в школу тенниса! Респект

😁30custom 524467345808373440711custom 54609121464706728916custom 63277164718498787171

29 Jun 2026, 11:58 UTC≈1,020 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Очень зря Роман Ришатович отдал этот сет Рубкову. Теперь для победы придётся потратить куда больше сил, чем следовало бы, а ведь во втором круге его будет ждать Ботик и уровень сопротивления там ожидается гораздо более высокий. Начинаю переживать за перспективы Сафиуллина на этом турнире

custom 546091214647067289127🤣21custom 63253302696246003448👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @atptalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ATPtalk” (@atptalk), 1,139 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atptalk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.