Back in the day, did you believe the theory that Historia was pregnant with Eren’s child? https://redd.it/1vhd4z7 @attack_on_titan_topic

Channel
¶ Attack on Titan • Fanatics🀄️
@attack_on_titan_topic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
83subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001154522664 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @attack_on_titan_topic |
| Created | Between 1 December 2018 and 31 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/attack_on_titan_topic |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 83 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 82 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 83 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 82 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 82 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Is it ever mentioned https://redd.it/1vfhhkp @attack_on_titan_topic
I mean I get it, but why?.. https://redd.it/1vaxulk @attack_on_titan_topic
I wonder what they thought about Eren at the end of the show https://i.redd.it/1d1tujeqk3gh1.gif https://redd.it/1v9lrfn @attack_on_titan_topic
Well… that explains Yelena’s Height https://redd.it/1v8y791 @attack_on_titan_topic
Any links to watch SNK in Japanese with Spanish subtitles ? I would like to have one, and free ofc. Because i didn't find ANYTHING. And if possible, a link where you can download the episodes, because i wanted to watch them during my flight https://redd.it/1v8vxps @attack_on_titan_topic
would've DOG WALKED Paradis and most likely finally have either killed or captured Eren. https://redd.it/1v8s28t @attack_on_titan_topic
In the 2nd battle of shinganshina, if you think about it, Marley lowkey was trying to save the world A situation they dug themselves in though. Let me start this off with that first so it doesn't sound like im downplaying Marley's role here. They 10000% made a situation for themselves they could've avoided, with that said, please hear me out on this. Anyway, the Marley wee see in the assault on shinganshina isn't re…
Photo, posted without a caption
Bruh, this dude's a greater aura farmer than Erwin https://redd.it/1v7rqbb @attack_on_titan_topic
What does this mean ? this is not Eren's will ? https://redd.it/1v8renp @attack_on_titan_topic
Why didn't Kruger give the Attack Titan to Dina? https://preview.redd.it/ioppcjsy5vfh1.png?width=1067&format=png&auto=webp&s=4bed84172de9b4e32983b99945ba5800d1224fb6 Grisha told them about her royal blood and its importance, so their plan of restoring Eldia, setting aside time paradoxes (because this can be used for basically anything), could work as following: 1. Kruger transforms and protects both Grisha and Din…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @attack_on_titan_topic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@kakarotsan07 · 1332 posts💮 Anime World 💮
@myworldpropic · 5952 posts/r/IngressPrimeFeedback
@IngressPrimeFeedback · 321 postr/Furrypasta
@r_furrypasta · 301 postr/GharKeKalesh
@r_gharkekalesh · 761 postI'm going to hell for this
@r_imgoingtohellforthis · 1261 post@r_invites
@r_invites · 1891 postRussianIsSoHard
@RussianIsSoHard · 61 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“¶ Attack on Titan • Fanatics🀄️” (@attack_on_titan_topic), 83 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/attack_on_titan_topic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.