Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ¶ Attack on Titan • Fanatics🀄️

Channel

¶ Attack on Titan • Fanatics🀄️

@attack_on_titan_topic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

83subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001154522664
TypeChannel
Username@attack_on_titan_topic
CreatedBetween 1 December 2018 and 31 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/attack_on_titan_topic

Growth

828382.57 August 2026 — 82 subscribers9 August 2026 — 82 subscribers22 August 2026 — 83 subscribers30 August 2026 — 82 subscribers8 September 2026 — 83 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 82–83 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 03:4183+1
30 Aug 2026, 16:0382-1
22 Aug 2026, 17:5483+1
9 Aug 2026, 18:0282no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:4282first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC11 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Back in the day, did you believe the theory that Historia was pregnant with Eren’s child? https://redd.it/1vhd4z7 @attack_on_titan_topic

5 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC16 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Is it ever mentioned https://redd.it/1vfhhkp @attack_on_titan_topic

30 Jul 2026, 20:13 UTC32 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

I mean I get it, but why?.. https://redd.it/1vaxulk @attack_on_titan_topic

29 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026

I wonder what they thought about Eren at the end of the show https://i.redd.it/1d1tujeqk3gh1.gif https://redd.it/1v9lrfn @attack_on_titan_topic

28 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC32 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Well… that explains Yelena’s Height https://redd.it/1v8y791 @attack_on_titan_topic

28 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026

Any links to watch SNK in Japanese with Spanish subtitles ? I would like to have one, and free ofc. Because i didn't find ANYTHING. And if possible, a link where you can download the episodes, because i wanted to watch them during my flight https://redd.it/1v8vxps @attack_on_titan_topic

28 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC19 viewsread 9 August 2026

would've DOG WALKED Paradis and most likely finally have either killed or captured Eren. https://redd.it/1v8s28t @attack_on_titan_topic

28 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC17 viewsread 9 August 2026

In the 2nd battle of shinganshina, if you think about it, Marley lowkey was trying to save the world A situation they dug themselves in though. Let me start this off with that first so it doesn't sound like im downplaying Marley's role here. They 10000% made a situation for themselves they could've avoided, with that said, please hear me out on this. Anyway, the Marley wee see in the assault on shinganshina isn't re

28 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC13 viewsread 9 August 2026

Bruh, this dude's a greater aura farmer than Erwin https://redd.it/1v7rqbb @attack_on_titan_topic

28 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC11 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

What does this mean ? this is not Eren's will ? https://redd.it/1v8renp @attack_on_titan_topic

28 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC10 viewsread 9 August 2026

Why didn't Kruger give the Attack Titan to Dina? https://preview.redd.it/ioppcjsy5vfh1.png?width=1067&format=png&auto=webp&s=4bed84172de9b4e32983b99945ba5800d1224fb6 Grisha told them about her royal blood and its importance, so their plan of restoring Eldia, setting aside time paradoxes (because this can be used for basically anything), could work as following: 1. Kruger transforms and protects both Grisha and Din

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @attack_on_titan_topic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“¶ Attack on Titan • Fanatics🀄️” (@attack_on_titan_topic), 83 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/attack_on_titan_topic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.