Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Audiolivros

Channel

Audiolivros

@audiolivros

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

81,112subscribers

+2,644 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001029676454
TypeChannel
Username@audiolivros
DescriptionDefendemos a disseminação livre e acessível do conhecimento, contribuindo para uma sociedade mais fraterna, justa e consciente. Nosso foco é produzir audiolivros, podcasts e resumos de livros com o auxílio da inteligência artificial. Bot: @audiolivrobot
Created29 December 2015measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/audiolivros

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Áudio livros — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

78,31681,11279,7145 August 2026 — 78,468 subscribers6 August 2026 — 78,406 subscribers7 August 2026 — 78,362 subscribers8 August 2026 — 78,327 subscribers9 August 2026 — 78,317 subscribers10 August 2026 — 78,534 subscribers11 August 2026 — 78,474 subscribers12 August 2026 — 78,431 subscribers13 August 2026 — 78,386 subscribers14 August 2026 — 78,350 subscribers16 August 2026 — 78,316 subscribers17 August 2026 — 78,700 subscribers18 August 2026 — 78,778 subscribers19 August 2026 — 78,751 subscribers20 August 2026 — 78,709 subscribers21 August 2026 — 78,663 subscribers22 August 2026 — 78,632 subscribers24 August 2026 — 78,889 subscribers25 August 2026 — 79,002 subscribers26 August 2026 — 79,055 subscribers27 August 2026 — 79,176 subscribers28 August 2026 — 79,287 subscribers29 August 2026 — 79,360 subscribers30 August 2026 — 79,456 subscribers31 August 2026 — 79,669 subscribers1 September 2026 — 79,700 subscribers2 September 2026 — 79,770 subscribers3 September 2026 — 79,819 subscribers5 September 2026 — 79,962 subscribers8 September 2026 — 80,331 subscribers11 September 2026 — 80,435 subscribers13 September 2026 — 80,554 subscribers14 September 2026 — 80,848 subscribers16 September 2026 — 80,955 subscribers19 September 2026 — 81,112 subscribers5 August 202619 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +2,644. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,897–81,531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:0081,112+157
16 Sept 2026, 15:3780,955+107
14 Sept 2026, 19:5780,848+294
13 Sept 2026, 04:1980,554+119
11 Sept 2026, 03:1880,435+104
8 Sept 2026, 02:1780,331+369
5 Sept 2026, 02:1779,962+143
3 Sept 2026, 10:2579,819+49
2 Sept 2026, 06:1179,770+70
1 Sept 2026, 07:1679,700+31
31 Aug 2026, 07:4479,669+213
30 Aug 2026, 10:1479,456+96
29 Aug 2026, 11:3379,360+73
28 Aug 2026, 12:4479,287+111
27 Aug 2026, 14:1679,176+121
26 Aug 2026, 12:2579,055+53
25 Aug 2026, 14:1279,002+113
24 Aug 2026, 11:2878,889+257
22 Aug 2026, 22:2778,632-31
21 Aug 2026, 15:0578,663first reading

Engagement

2,094 posts held, back to 29 December 2015the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 293 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.01%
avg views ÷ 81,112 subscribers
Avg views / post
818
138 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.166%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
138
of 2,094 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 138 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held2,094 (29 December 201521 September 2026)
Views total112,877
Reactions total67
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 08:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
267
Videos
45
Links
498

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20m 12s
Average length
1m 50s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 64 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5754.3%
🔥1716.2%
👍76.67%
👏76.67%
🥰76.67%
🤪32.86%
😱21.90%
🙏21.90%
🗿10.952%
😁10.952%
🤔10.952%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 369 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 953 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 October 2025 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC432 views1 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @estabaratoVideo

Video, posted without a caption

👏1

21 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC364 viewsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @estabaratoPhoto

Confira Pipoqueira Para Micro-ondas Sem Óleo Balde Pipoca Silicone Redonda Com Tampa saudável sem BPA por R$29,99. Encontre na Shopee agora! https://s.shopee.com.br/5fovq5XEQa?share_channel_code=2

21 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTC375 views1 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Galera! Ajude o canal a bater 1k no Spotify. Precisamos de apenas 274 inscritos. Quanto chegar a essa meta libero audiolivros exclusivos e de bônus MicroAudiolivros para comemorar. 🎉🎉🎉Compartilhe.

🙏1

21 Sept 2026, 17:14 UTC380 viewsread 22 September 2026

​​O maior e melhor canal de Audiolivros agora está no Spotify.

21 Sept 2026, 00:32 UTC606 viewsread 22 September 2026
File

04 O Nascimento do Nominalismo e a Tradição de Boécio - Os textos abordam a evolução histórica da escolástica medieval, examinando como os primeiros comentadores medievais, como Rabanus Maurus e autores anônimos dos séculos IX e X, interpretaram as obras lógicas de Aristóteles e Porfírio através das traduções e comentários de Boécio. A análise demonstra que esses primeiros eruditos já debatiam a natureza dos universa

21 Sept 2026, 00:29 UTC475 viewsread 22 September 2026
File

03 O Germe da Escolástica: De Porfírio a Boécio - O texto examina a origem e o desenvolvimento da filosofia escolástica, situando seu ponto de partida em uma frase de Porfírio traduzida e comentada por Boécio. Este breve trecho antigo introduziu o problema dos universais, questionando se gêneros e espécies possuem existência real ou são meras construções mentais. O autor destaca que, embora a Idade Média dispusesse d

21 Sept 2026, 00:26 UTC385 viewsread 22 September 2026
File

A Dialética de Abelardo e os Fundamentos da Lógica Medieval - O texto analisa a obra Dialética de Pedro Abelardo, explorando sua estrutura pedagógica dividida em cinco partes fundamentais: proposições simples, silogismos categóricos, tópicos, silogismos hipotéticos e definições. A fonte investiga a autenticidade de manuscritos históricos, sugerindo que Abelardo compôs tratados elementares para jovens, como as Introdu

21 Sept 2026, 00:23 UTC349 viewsread 22 September 2026
File

01 Abelardo e os Fundamentos da Dialética Escolástica. O texto apresentado reúne fragmentos filosóficos analisados e comentados por V. Cousin, concentrando-se na figura de Pedro Abelardo como o grande expoente da escolástica medieval. A obra examina minuciosamente diversos manuscritos originais encontrados em bibliotecas parisienses, detalhando tratados lógicos e gramaticais sobre dialética, aristotelismo e teologia

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,094 posts we hold for @audiolivros. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@audiolivros edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LEITURA BR
@LEITURA_BR · 170,248
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 August 2026
Biblioteca 📚
@Biblioteca_Gratis · 178,195
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 16 August 2026
O Grande e Poderoso Gênio
@UniDraminhas · 122,167
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 16 August 2026
Brasil Livros 📚
@Brasil_Livros_Canal · 370,564
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 16 August 2026
GRUPO OFICIAL NATH ARCURI!
@jornadadadesfudencia · 105,172
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
🇺🇸 Inglês pelo Telegram
@inglespelotelegram · 112,649
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 16 August 2026
TrailersBR ✨| Filmes e Séries
@TrailersBR · 114,329
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 16 August 2026
PopcornBR 🍿 News
@popcornportal · 101,900
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Audiolivros” (@audiolivros), 81,112 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/audiolivros.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.