Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,540–2,572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 20:59
2,545
+1
12 Sept 2026, 07:20
2,544
-4
7 Sept 2026, 18:58
2,548
-2
3 Sept 2026, 01:48
2,550
+2
27 Aug 2026, 18:58
2,548
+1
25 Aug 2026, 05:13
2,547
-4
22 Aug 2026, 01:29
2,551
-3
18 Aug 2026, 08:33
2,554
+2
15 Aug 2026, 19:07
2,552
-5
12 Aug 2026, 17:02
2,557
-4
9 Aug 2026, 19:01
2,561
-5
6 Aug 2026, 16:20
2,566
-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:47
2,568
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 54m
Average length
7m 08s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
125 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
70
56.0%
❤
55
44.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#Zad_Al_Mustaqni #Hanbali_Rechtsschule
• Auszüge aus der Erläuterung des ḥanbalitischen Fiqh-Werkes „Zād Al-Mustaqniʿ“
Kapitel/Buch: „Kitab At-Taharah“ (Buch über die Reinigung)
• Autor: Mūsā Al-Ḥajjāwī (895 - 968 n. H.)
• (5.) Wie lautet die Definition des Fachbegriffs „Taharah“ & „Hadath“ & „Khabath“.
https://youtu.be/fI4Y2XkrfT4?si=nToDstusJme-WUiR
https://t.me/audios_durus
📚 Auszüge aus der Erläuterung des 'Aqidah-Buches „#Kitāb_At_Tauhid“ von Imām Muhammad Ibn 'Abdil-Wahhāb
• (7.5.) Definition von Talisman & Amulett. Das Urteil eines Talismans, bestehend aus Quran bestehen.
https://youtu.be/5SmxgCoMNRk?si=VtaH8hDDTxlm7wK3
https://t.me/audios_durus
https://t.me/islamstudy_hadith
#Zad_Al_Mustaqni #Hanbali_Rechtsschule
• Auszüge aus der Erläuterung des ḥanbalitischen Fiqh-Werkes „Zād Al-Mustaqniʿ“
Kapitel/Buch: „Kitab At-Taharah“ (Buch über die Reinigung)
• Autor: Mūsā Al-Ḥajjāwī (895 - 968 n. H.)
• (4.) Warum wird in den Fiqh-Werken mit „Kitab At-Taharah“ begonnen, und was bedeutet „Kitab“?
https://youtu.be/V9XG4EMrCpE?si=Bb3tL7iIYnMBtb2s
https://t.me/audios_durus
#Imam_Ahmad #Hanbali_Madhhab
📚 #Auszüge aus dem Vortrag: „Uṣūl Madhhab Al-Imām Aḥmad.“
(„Die Grundlagen/Quellen der Rechtsschule von Imām Aḥmad“)
• (4.) Ein Scheinargument über Imam Ahmad. Fast niemand hat jemals Ahmad Ibn Hanbal kritisiert.
- War Ahmad nur kein Muhaddith und kein Faqih?
- Hat At-Tabari Ahmad Ibn Hanbal kritisiert?
• Abu Suleyman Al-Kurdi
https://youtu.be/bUns151ljII?si=yBn8baRe9mpv_16O
https:…
#Al_Wasitiyyah
📚 #Auszüge aus dem Studium des Werkes „Al-ʿAqīdah Al-Wāsiṭiyyah“ von Imām Abul-ʿAbbās Ibn Taymiyyah (661 - 728 n. H.).
• 3.2. Wann - also zu welchen Zeiten - es erwünscht ist, Surah Al-Ikhlas zu lesen.
• Erläuterung: Abu Suleyman Al-Kurdi
https://youtu.be/zlWNEV3k5Ss?si=upzTv3cm6WU0HDRV
https://t.me/audios_durus
📚 Auszüge aus der Erläuterung des 'Aqidah-Buches „#Kitāb_At_Tauhid“ von Imām Muhammad Ibn 'Abdil-Wahhāb
• (7.4.) Der Unterschied zwischen demjenigen, der sich Allah anvertraut und dem Talismanträger.
https://youtu.be/8baUh9zPm60?si=NNQlvY_5-gwLY2XZ
https://t.me/audios_durus
https://t.me/islamstudy_hadith
📚 Auszüge aus der Lesung des Werkes „Ḥirāsatu Al-Faḍīlah“
(Die Bewachung der sauberen Tugend)
Autor: Bakr Abū Zayd (1365 - 1429 n. H.)
▪️ Die muslimischen Frauen mit Hijab müssen gestärkt werden, da ihre Lage viel schwieriger ist als bei Männern.
https://t.me/audios_durus
📚 Auszüge aus der Lesung und Erläuterung des Werkes #Ahkam_An_Nisa (Regeln rund um die Frauen)
Autor: Abū Bakr Al-Khallāl (235 - 311 n. H.) überliefert über Imām Aḥmad.
• (13.) Das Ablegen des Hijabs im Hof des Hauses, sofern Fremde sie nicht sehen können.
https://youtu.be/3N89H4FhJ-c?si=kSnPOwC5tuzGyyND
https://t.me/audios_durus
📚 Die Beschreibung der Gebetswaschung
• Text zusammengestellt von Abu Suleyman
• Synchronisation: Bruder Ramadan aus Österreich, Student in Riad
https://t.me/audios_durus
#Imam_Ahmad #Hanbali_Madhhab
📚 #Auszüge aus dem Vortrag: „Uṣūl Madhhab Al-Imām Aḥmad.“
(„Die Grundlagen/Quellen der Rechtsschule von Imām Aḥmad“)
• (3.) Als Imam Ahmad in den Jemen zum Hadith-Gelehrten 'Abdur-Razzaq ging. Über 1500 km zu Fuß.
- Die erste Nacht nach der Ankunft im Jemen.
- Imam Ahmad hatte 3 Tage nicht gegessen.
• Abu Suleyman Al-Kurdi
https://youtu.be/aV9KHtPHPXk?si=oT5lXEyCKpFTztUu
https://t.…
#Al_Wasitiyyah
📚 #Auszüge aus dem Studium des Werkes „Al-ʿAqīdah Al-Wāsiṭiyyah“ von Imām Abul-ʿAbbās Ibn Taymiyyah (661 - 728 n. H.).
• 3.1. Das, womit Allah Sich selbst in Surah Al-Ikhlas beschrieben hat.
• Erläuterung: Abu Suleyman Al-Kurdi
https://youtu.be/Wjbgv-XS4_Q?si=YuwjV2H2HTQwFzs4
https://t.me/audios_durus
📚 Auszüge aus der Erläuterung des 'Aqidah-Buches „#Kitāb_At_Tauhid“ von Imām Muhammad Ibn 'Abdil-Wahhāb
• (7.3.) Der nahezu-Sahabi 'Abdullah Ibn ’Ukaym. Was bedeutet „Mukhadram“? Definition Sahabi.
https://youtu.be/8A3ckowo9Cg?si=ya1SAqiheXr5TTn7
https://t.me/audios_durus
https://t.me/islamstudy_hadith
👍5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @audios_durus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@audios_durus named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@islamstudy_hadith named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Audios & Unterrichte” (@audios_durus), 2,545 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/audios_durus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.