Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aufbruch (Offiziell)

Channel

Aufbruch (Offiziell)

@aufbruch1996

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

483subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001456979247
TypeChannel
Username@aufbruch1996
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aufbruch1996

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

482485483.56 August 2026 — 482 subscribers6 August 2026 — 482 subscribers14 August 2026 — 483 subscribers20 August 2026 — 484 subscribers26 August 2026 — 485 subscribers11 September 2026 — 484 subscribers19 September 2026 — 483 subscribers4836 August 202619 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 44 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 482–485 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:58483-1
11 Sept 2026, 16:35484-1
26 Aug 2026, 13:44485+1
20 Aug 2026, 14:08484+1
14 Aug 2026, 07:08483+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:49482no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:04482first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1340.6%
🕊618.8%
👍515.6%
👏412.5%
26.25%
🔥26.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC146 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🇩🇪 Hier eine Hörprobe von befreundeten Bands. Die CD wird am Donnerstag bei One-Eight erscheinen 🇪🇸 Aquí tienen una muestra de audio de bandas amigas. El CD saldrá a la venta el jueves al sello One-Eight. 🇮🇹 Ecco un assaggio musicale di alcune band amiche. Il CD uscirà giovedì per la One-Eight.

1

2 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC191 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @dermichel95

+++ Behörden-Willkür in Thüringen: Familie wegen legaler Musik kriminalisiert und Kleinkinder entzogen +++ Was wie ein schlechter Film klingt, ist für eine Familie aus der Glockenstadt Apolda bittere, existenzvernichtende Realität. Weil die Eltern im eigenen Haushalt Musik des patriotischen Musikprojekts „Der Michel“ hörten, setzten die lokalen Behörden (Ordnungsamt und Jugendamt Weimarer Land) eine beispiellose Sch

16 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC262 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @rockhatePhoto

Und nochmal Aufbruch. Als dieses Album damals rauskam, ist es in der damaligen Sturm und Drang Zeit voll an mir vorbeigegangen. Doch vor einiger Zeit gab es dann glücklicherweise eine Nachpressung des Albums, dass musikalisch voll in den 90ern liegt und einen krassen Gegensatz zum neueren Album "Im Nebel der Zeit" bildet. Die Steigerung und Entwicklung einer Gruppe in über 20 Jahren, kann man sich mit beiden Alben

3🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 05:36 UTC281 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @rockhatePhoto

Bei Aufbruch ist es eigentlich egal, ob man sich nun die ganz alten, oder die neuen Veröffentlichungen anhört. Die Klänge vom damals spiegelten bestens den typischen Sound der 90er Jahre wieder, während "Im Nebel der Zeit" von der Qualität her weit nach vorne geschossen ist. Es ist auch zugleich eine sehr unterschätzte Gruppe - das war damals so und so ist es auch noch heute. Musik und Texte die nicht langweilig werd

🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC222 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @rockhatePhoto

✅ Neue Sendung am Start. Unser Manuellsen ist wieder wach, Uschi's Inventur ist beendet und meine Wenigkeit ist vom Unfall wieder genesen. Also ran ans Werk. Zum Inhalt: + Der AfD Parteitag und das Maulheldentum der Antifa. + Das AfD Verbotsverfahren. Alles nur heiße Luft? + CD-Besprechung der neuen Fürstenbund. + Die Vinyl-Ecke: Störkraft, Siegeszug und Lunikoff. + Landtagswahl im September. Um was wetten wir

👍21

1 Jul 2026, 03:01 UTC280 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @oposrecordsPhoto

Denkt bei diesen Temperaturen auch an die Tiere in eurer Umgebung. 🦔 🦅 🐈‍⬛ 🐕

5

28 Jun 2026, 19:52 UTC207 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Mai-Sendung - Teil 2 Frauen trinken Sprudel... Jingle, Einleitung, Korrekturen und Ergänzungen RE LP 10:35 Sturm 18 - Ein Mensch wie du | 2008 Frontfeuer - Unbeugsam (20 Jahre) | 2026 Disturbed Mother Fucker - From times gone by | 2026 Neuheiten ● Hulduvolk - Hulduvolk 13:28 ● Oidoxie - Gesichert rechtsextrem 31:20 ● Ingo24 - Von der Straße in die Fresse 50:21 ● Stahlkappenglanz - Zieh die Stiefel endlich an 1:11:

👏1

27 Jun 2026, 16:25 UTC175 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @HerrenzimmerPhoto

Wieder so ein „bedauerlicher Einzelfall“. Wieder in Frankreich. Wieder würde ich mich bei der offenen Benennung der Täter wahrscheinlich der Volksverhetzung schuldig machen. Bald auch in deiner Stadt! Wappnet euch. Treibt Sport. Bildet Banden. Seid vorbereitet. Wehrt euch.

26 Jun 2026, 06:52 UTC216 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sicherheitshinweisePhoto

#Kurztipp Datenschutz Man sollte Passwörter nicht von einer KI erstellen lassen. Von einer KI erstellte Passwörter wirken zwar manchmal komplex, beinhalten jedoch wiederholbare Muster, vorhersehbare Strategien oder sogar schwer erkennbar schwache Zusammensetzungen. Zudem können KI-generierte Passwörter in seltenen Fällen Ähnlichkeiten zu bereits bekannten oder häufig verwendeten Varianten aufweisen, was das Risiko

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aufbruch1996. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aufbruch (Offiziell)” (@aufbruch1996), 483 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aufbruch1996.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.