Agnès Varda
custom 51680579287871669637
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇

Channel
@augederzeit
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
359subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001507852544 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @augederzeit |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/augederzeit |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 359 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 358 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 355 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 354 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 353 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 354 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 354 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
81 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5278345262949998604 | 20 | 24.7% | |
| custom 5168057928787166963 | 15 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5168323379240896979 | 14 | 17.3% | |
| custom 5168413466179929651 | 12 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5314494069945170345 | 10 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5420084354858646915 | 6 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5165826379744281915 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| custom 5357172593029840376 | 2 | 2.47% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Agnès Varda
custom 51680579287871669637
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
File, posted without a caption
custom 51683233792408969795
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 51683233792408969794
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
𖥤 𖥤
custom 51684134661799296516custom 53571725930298403762
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
Teiera Christopher Dresser
custom 51658263797442819152
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
File, posted without a caption
custom 53144940699451703455
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 51684134661799296516
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
Nelson Pernisco
custom 51680579287871669636
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
Satyr Reuben Nakian 1950
custom 54200843548586469155
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
Video, posted without a caption
custom 527834526294999860413custom 53144940699451703455custom 54200843548586469151
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
✄ ✄
custom 51683233792408969795
Signed ⚉ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥙнᥲ ⚇
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @augederzeit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“̇ȧ̇u̇̇ġ̇ė ̇ḋ̇ė̇ṙ ̇ż̇ė̇i̇̇ṫ” (@augederzeit), 359 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/augederzeit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.