Channel
@august301
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
167subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001629381883 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @august301 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/august301 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 167 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 168 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 169 | +8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 161 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 161 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 1 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
380 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 185 | 48.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 61 | 16.1% | |
| 🥰 | 51 | 13.4% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 10.5% | |
| 💋 | 18 | 4.74% | |
| 🤝 | 10 | 2.63% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 2.37% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.789% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.263% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.263% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.263% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 380 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @august301. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 February 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я впервые увидела Эдварда таким злым рядом с собой. Он грубо обхватил моё лицо. – Безумная! Ты просто безумная! – Как и ты. И я провела когтями по его скуле, упиваясь желанием и отвращением мужчины. Художник: Августь 🤩 #творчество | #шифршекспира Истории Эми 🤩
💋10❤5🥰5🔥1
Корделия поначалу казалась самой тихой из нас. Но уже через несколько тактов я увидела перемену. Она выпрямилась. Её жесты стали точнее. В теле появилась уверенность, которой раньше почти не бывало – то было нарастающее знание собственного места в круге. Меня это насторожило. Нельзя было понять, радоваться ли такой перемене в девушке, или бояться её. Художник: Августь ❤️ #творчество | #шифршекспира Истории Эми🐍
❤15🔥4🥰2
Что-то на гомоэротичном. #genshinimpact #dottolone
❤16❤🔥12🥰6😭1
— Сколько артов ты с ними хочешь? — Да. #шифршекспира #клубромантики
🥰14🙏9❤🔥7❤2
Вспомнила пароль от аккаунта. #шифршекспира #клубромантики
🔥20❤11🥰4
Рядом стоял Кристофер – молодой, необузданный и уже с тем шальным блеском в глазах, который появляется, когда слова начинают обгонять разум. Он сжал перо ещё сильнее, и тьма начала собираться вокруг него – медленно, как чернила, расползающиеся по воде. – Мы должны усилить конфликт Шотландии и Англии. Так пусть же природа в городках шотландских начнёт с ума сходить, Подобно чернилам тёмным там небо начнёт гнить. И озе…
❤16
Не разбегаемся, я просто не знаю, когда картинку выложат мою хдд Упд: теперь знаю, сказали на выходных хдд
❤15❤🔥2
Бу испугались
❤🔥5
Это я смотрю на дату последнего поста и каждый раз откладываю рисование на потом из-за усталости:
🤝10💔1
Не то что бы я не рисую совсем хдд
🥰15❤🔥8
И в дополнение к верхнему посту: первая попытка и вторая хдд
❤20😍3
Мне незнаком концепт стабильности. #кр #шш #клубромантики #шифршекспира
❤22🔥8❤🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @august301. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Августь” (@august301), 167 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/august301.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.