Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 87 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,179–6,359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 10:29
6,200
-1
30 Oct 2026, 02:50
6,201
-4
26 Oct 2026, 22:06
6,205
-18
24 Oct 2026, 01:20
6,223
-8
21 Oct 2026, 03:49
6,231
-10
18 Oct 2026, 07:34
6,241
-13
15 Oct 2026, 16:05
6,254
-22
12 Oct 2026, 08:41
6,276
+11
5 Oct 2026, 08:54
6,265
-47
26 Sept 2026, 20:37
6,312
-26
17 Sept 2026, 23:40
6,338
+4
14 Sept 2026, 06:18
6,334
-4
10 Sept 2026, 16:17
6,338
+11
5 Sept 2026, 07:16
6,327
+21
1 Sept 2026, 21:45
6,306
+1
29 Aug 2026, 20:17
6,305
+50
26 Aug 2026, 23:18
6,255
-3
24 Aug 2026, 01:43
6,258
+9
20 Aug 2026, 09:36
6,249
+7
17 Aug 2026, 11:35
6,242
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
45.2%
avg views ÷ 6,200 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,810
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held
38 (20 June 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total
39,270
Reactions total
669
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 16:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
620
Videos
37
Links
119
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
40s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,349 reactions across 37 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,349
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,349 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 37 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aurelians_way. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 1 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Сейчас стало модным такое пожелание женщин как «зарплата жены». Только самый ленивый женский психолог не научил этому своих адепток. Нам даже несколько клиентов с порога заявляли, что готовы платить её… настолько это для многих стало нормой.
Я говорю, СТОП, вы в себе вообще? Какая ещё зарплата жены? А где тогда зарплата мужа? Т.е. ты на полном серьезе планируешь при разводе отдать половину нажитого, а всё это время …
Часто можно услышать от девушек: «он хочет только секса, а отношений не хочет». И девушки обижаются, обвиняя мужчин и обзывая самыми нехорошими словами.
Но давайте признаем: если мужчины хотят секса, но не хотят «отношений» - это означает, что в таких отношениях они не видят никакой ценности. И тут у дам два варианта: или искать тех нерациональных, голодных до женского внимания, кто готов играть в эту неинтересную д…
Иногда встречаю мнение о нас, что мы знакомим русских девушек с иностранцами. Это было примерно 3 раза и то клиенты находили нас сами. Такой цели нет. Но мы работаем с русскоязычными мужчинами со всего мира и не смотрим на их национальность. Любовь, отношения и секс должны быть вне границ, национальностей, политики.
Большинство наших русскоязычных зарубежных клиентов объединяет одно: в их локации очень сложно найти …
Путь Аврелиана pinned «Какое-то время назад закрыл тут комментарии из-за постоянного спама, флуда, атак обиженных на меня свах, гендерных войн и попыток нецелевой аудитории доказать мне, что мы тут всё делаем неправильно. Но немного заскучал по вам и решил открыть комментарии снова.…»
Какое-то время назад закрыл тут комментарии из-за постоянного спама, флуда, атак обиженных на меня свах, гендерных войн и попыток нецелевой аудитории доказать мне, что мы тут всё делаем неправильно.
Но немного заскучал по вам и решил открыть комментарии снова.
Зафиксируем правила.
Удаляются комментарии, а при повторном нарушении (иногда и сразу) автор лишается возможности комментировать в следующих случаях:
- У вас …
Наш новый тариф с холодным поиском кандидаток https://t.me/aurelians_way/865 имеет успех. Вот уже второй клиент найден.
Но в этом случае мужчина захотел сделать фильтр еще более жестким, даже если это приведет к существенному повышению стоимости. Немного подумав, решили вернуться к проверенному источнику – к сайту Хедхантер.
На первом этапе будем искать кандидаток по региону, типажу и желаемому перечню профессий. У…
Новое интервью, где обсудили ряд актуальных вопросов:
- портрет нашего клиента и желаемой кандидатки
- какие сейчас продукты и чем они отличаются
- какие главные ожидания у наших кандидатов
- что влияет на эффективность подбора и какие стоп-факторы чаще всего озвучивают успешные мужчины
- почему для мужчин важна семья девушки, ее биография и источник доходов
- является ли брак сделкой
- зачем мы создали «устав пары…
Последние 2 месяца занимались созданием нового сайта и личного кабинета для клиентов.
Подошли основательно.
Сначала изучали метрики старого сайта и клиентские пути. Далее общались с действующими клиентами и кандидатками и выявляли узкие места в их опыте взаимодействия с нами. На основе этих данных проектировали новые клиентские пути. С учетом всего этого отредактировали позиционирование, тарифы, отобразили всё на н…
Как писал ранее https://t.me/aurelians_way/865 у нас появился новый тариф, где мы находим кандидаток исключительно методами холодного поиска, а сами кандидатки не в курсе, что мужчина – клиент агентства знакомств.
И, вот, спустя 10 дней с момента анонса, у нас появился первый клиент на данный продукт.
В связи с этим сообщаю о
ВАКАНСИИ.
Нам нужно несколько человек на удаленную работу, которые готовы в свободном гиб…
Я редко тут пишу про успешные кейсы, т.к. клиенты обычно хотят сохранить всё в тайне, а я люблю, когда есть лица-имена и контент вызывает доверие.
Но вот Заур, о котором я рассказывал тут https://t.me/aurelians_way/730 человек – открытый и своего факта обращения к нам не скрывает. Более того, для заинтересованных, но сомневающихся есть опция – получить фидбек от Заура лично.
Что было трудным: клиент искал девушку…
👍117
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @aurelians_way. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Попадалось ли вам моё лицо в интернете в последние 7 дней?
Да, рекламный баннер на одном из сайтов3%
Да, много раз рекламные баннеры на разных сайтах1%
Да, подкаст в рекомендациях Ютуба6%
Да, рилсы в инсте (подписаны)5%
Да, рилсы в инсте (не подписаны)2%
НЕТ, за последние 7 дней не попадалось.78%
Просто зачем-то посмотреть ответы других8%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Леди и дамы, изменяли ли вы, будучи в постоянных отношениях или замужем?
Нет, никогда38%
Да, т.к. партнер уделял мало внимания, не хватало секса3%
Да, т.к. мстила за измену партнера1%
Да, т.к. хотелось разнообразия2%
Да, т.к. считаю это нормой0%
Это не было изменой, партнер разрешил1%
Да, по другим причинам3%
Никогда не была в постоянных отношениях1%
Не буду отвечать, но посмотрю ответ5%
Я - мужчина, посмотреть ответ48%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 1 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
партия любви @SMpodcast · 37,299 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Путь Аврелиана” (@aurelians_way), 6,200 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aurelians_way.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.