Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for aurjum

Channel

aurjum

@aurjum_art

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

310subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001296850329
TypeChannel
Username@aurjum_art
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aurjum_art

Growth

3083103099 September 2026 — 308 subscribers9 September 2026 — 308 subscribers11 September 2026 — 310 subscribers9 September 202611 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 308–310 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 22:17310+2
9 Sept 2026, 23:22308no change
9 Sept 2026, 22:47308first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 24 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

143 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52584758165257698476042.0%
2920.3%
🔥149.79%
custom 5791706705087697323139.09%
❤‍🔥96.29%
😭64.20%
custom 579172140246578386242.80%
👍42.80%
💅21.40%
10.699%
🎉10.699%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 May 2026, 05:31 UTC374 views16 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

А в «Ладоге» и графитинты, оказывается, не блестят 😏 Ну ладно ⭐️ Создается ощущение, что у #derwent graphitint меньше графита, поэтому там получается и красный, и оранжевый, и желто-зеленый, и голубой… более чистые цвета, почти как акварель аккуратненько до прозрачности размывается, но это только в сравнении. По тону все тоже самое остается, если про самый темный говорить, самый светлый тон будет светлее за счёт чи

custom 525847581652576984795👍2

25 May 2026, 06:04 UTC341 views18 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Потестила ещё «графитинты у нас дома». Даже не знаю, стоит ли брать, если нет дервентовских. Как будто не стоит 😑 Так как в основе должен быть графит, то мне не хватает обычно насыщенности темного. Получается темно-серый и из-за этого не такой контрастный рисунок. А тут ещё, как будто надо больше воды добавить, чтоб графита было меньше и осталась акварельная составляющая, чтоб вообще цвет проявился. Попыталась восп

10custom 57917067050876973233👍2custom 525847581652576984721

19 May 2026, 05:59 UTC267 views22 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Смотрите, какая книжка теперь у меня есть! Ну такие иллюстрации, я не удержалась, а это все хеккил 🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱 Да и на озоне скидка на неё хорошая ПОСЛЕ ТОГО КАК Я КУПИЛА

custom 525847581652576984711😭62💅2custom 57917067050876973231

12 May 2026, 20:35 UTC320 views13 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

🩵Посмотрела я на кюветки акварели, которые мне на слепой тест прислали, и напомнили они мне кюветки куретаке. Я куретаке видела только на фото, но сложилось ощущение, как будто там капнули краску и она, как блинное тесто, по стенкам кюветы растеклась. Вот моя зеленая кювета выглядит именно так. 🌱 Но я уверена, что все кюветы 🌱 были залиты одинаково, 🌱 просто усохли по-разному

custom 525847581652576984711custom 57917067050876973232

11 May 2026, 21:13 UTC274 views22 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня встретились с Настей и она поздравила меня с прошедшим днем рождения. Я в восторге от самодельных палитр, держателя для кисточек — вот это прям вау, я все время ищу куда бы приткнуть сохнуть кисть, и даже торт был! А ещё внезапно потестила «графитинты у нас дома» от скетчмаркер и обновленную масляную пастель сонет и мп брауберг 🌼

🔥11custom 525847581652576984772🎉1custom 57917067050876973231

25 Apr 2026, 16:31 UTC268 views29 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Мини-пленэр недельной давности #акварель

custom 525847581652576984720custom 57917067050876973235custom 57917214024657838624

24 Apr 2026, 08:15 UTC281 views23 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Рубрика эксперименты 2 Воодушевившись прошлым опытом, я подумала, что будет хорошо провернуть то же самое не с окнами, а в пейзаже. Солнце подсвечивает листья, бликует на гладких ветках… ну идеально, чтобы использовать белый карандаш и потом залить все акварелькой. Не знаю как сильно надо было давить, но карандаши не сработали. Потом думала сверху можно дорисовать и будет более менее, но тоже не то. То ли дело жир

10❤‍🔥9🔥3custom 57917067050876973231

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @aurjum_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Красный Карандаш
@krasniy_karandash · 28,248
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“aurjum” (@aurjum_art), 310 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aurjum_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.