Channel
@aurorasewspb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
968subscribers
+77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001975234402 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aurorasewspb |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aurorasewspb |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 06:26 | 968 | +18 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 950 | +27 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 923 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 924 | +5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 919 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 918 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 917 | +25 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:51 | 892 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 891 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 891 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
79 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 53.2% | |
| 🙏 | 13 | 16.5% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 12.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 7.59% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.06% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 5.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хэлп ми! 🤯 Мозговой штурм Надо осноровить низ. А там волан обметанный по краю в рельеф вшит. И что-то я не могу придумать ничего. Как с уже вшитыми воланами низ подрезать? 🤯 Что думаете?
❤3
Процесс 1. Не угадала немного с расположением передних воланов на юбке. Они у меня "слиплись" сверху, а на референсе между ними расстояние. Буду разделять их. 2. Надо ещё поработать с воланом на плечах. 3. Креп-шифон тяжеленный :( Нет воздушности в воланах. Нужно что-то невесомое для этой модели. 4. И вот вопрос - делать ли большее расклешение внизу юбки? Расход пока 10 метров 🤭
❤8👏4
Я тут начала его разглядывать перед построением, а оно такое интересное, оказывается 😂 Я почему-то перед моделированием смотрю на вещь как-то иначе. Мне стало совершенно очевидно, что сзади рельеф. При этом воланы на юбке согласованы с воланами на лифе. И спереди они все вообще в одну точку сходятся - по центру переда на талии. А ещё вам не кажется, что юбка годе? Всё меняется 😂🤦♀.
❤8🔥4
Доброе утро всем. Сдала ноутбук в ремонт. Жду когда починят (в четверг говорят) и сразу начну работу на Терцией. Но нам нужно набрать ещё около 10 человек, так что, если кто-то думает, то пора :)
❤5🔥3
🎉Открыт предзаказ новой выкройки🎉 Всем привет. Я всё таки рискну запустить это платье, но напомню, что участников обязательно должно быть не меньше 20чел. Выкройка самого платья довольно простая и вся соль здесь в воланчиках. Предчувствую, что проработка потребует большого запаса ткани 😂 Больше подробностей на страничке сайта https://aurorasew.ru/tertia
❤9👍6🔥3
У нас ужасный недобор голосов и вообще посещаемости канала 😱 Может я совсем не интересная, а может людям просто не зайти в Телеграм. Меня и тот, и другой вариант очень расстраивает :( В любом случае пока запуск новой выкройки сделать не получится :( Буду думать как улучшить ситуацию.
🙏13😢4
Я буду участвовать в предзаказе:
The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤7
📢Отбор новой выкройки👉 Итак, вы мне прислали очень много классных референсов, но пока у меня получается только одна выкройка в месяц 😭 А идей лет на пять уже 😂 К тому же мне не хочется измучить вас голосованиями. Поэтому мне пришлось исключить: ❌ Кутюр. Так как это будет полезно единицам, а стоимость лекал будет слишком высокая. ❌То, что висит в воздухе, то есть сфотографировано без тела или манекена - не ясны проп…
❤2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @aurorasewspb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Я буду участвовать в предзаказе:
The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aurora Sew. Выкройки, швейные марафоны и уроки” (@aurorasewspb), 968 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aurorasewspb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.