Bot

VIEWS BOT⚡️

@auto_view_robot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

22,660monthly users

-5,112 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID	8399998677
Type	Bot
Username	@auto_view_robot
First recorded	15 August 2026
Last confirmed live	27 October 2026
Measurements held	29
Confirmed unchanged	2 times, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegram	t.me/auto_view_robot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

29 measurements spanning 80 days, net -5,112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,526–39,018 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)	Monthly users	Change
26 Oct 2026, 06:56	22,660	-1,010
24 Oct 2026, 07:16	23,670	+862
22 Oct 2026, 07:26	22,808	-546
20 Oct 2026, 23:19	23,354	-1,005
18 Oct 2026, 20:19	24,359	-8,904
14 Oct 2026, 22:01	33,263	-434
13 Oct 2026, 12:30	33,697	-867
9 Oct 2026, 10:38	34,564	-1,160
4 Oct 2026, 23:59	35,724	+561
27 Sept 2026, 21:40	35,163	-1,721
15 Sept 2026, 19:38	36,884	+2,132
14 Sept 2026, 06:16	34,752	+3,436
12 Sept 2026, 16:19	31,316	+175
10 Sept 2026, 16:22	31,141	+30
7 Sept 2026, 15:20	31,111	+1,513
4 Sept 2026, 17:17	29,598	+887
1 Sept 2026, 01:05	28,711	+95
29 Aug 2026, 02:53	28,616	+520
26 Aug 2026, 00:32	28,096	+208
25 Aug 2026, 00:05	27,888	first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

𝘽𝙊𝙏𝙎 𝘽𝙔 𝘿𝙀𝙑 🗿
@titanium_bots_channel · 142,4694 posts Views Bot News♦️
@views_bot_news · 23,1984 posts 𝗫𝗼𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘁𝘇𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗲𝗿𝗮
@Channle_by_mmsp · 831 post 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐋𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐌𝐄🇦🇿
@eyeslieee · 2361 post Fixed king 👑
@fixed_match_channel · 11 post ︎
@gifdsdhn · 221 post 𝐊𝐄𝐄𝐏
@lanacantik2 · 421 post 𝙍𝙞𝙘𝙠 ( 𝐏𝐚𝐲 𝐓𝐨 𝐏𝐚𝐲 )
@Rick_PayToPay · 1671 post 𝐂𝗋𝗒𝗉𝗍𝗈 𝐊𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝐁𝗈𝗑🧧🎁
@SLOTS_X_AGENCY · 6031 post Visit world and special Ethiopia
@tourismofethiopaandworld · 761 post ♤FREE FIRE & V2RAYNG♤
@vpn1357 · 1631 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VIEWS BOT⚡️” (@auto_view_robot), 22,660 monthly users as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/auto_view_robot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.